|
|
#84 of 95 by C. S. McGee (cmcgee <bio?login=cmcgee>) on Sun Nov 17 18:54:58 2002: you are a wealthy woman playing at living in poverty, and you have chosen to live very simply. most people here have refrained from trying to convince you to make a different choice. it would be nice if you would give us the same respect. Please treat other people's perceptions and choices as _valid_for_them_. no matter how many times you repeat yourself, you are not changing anyone's mind. #87 of 95 by C. Keesan (keesan <bio?login=keesan>) on Mon Nov 18 13:59:18 2002: Off on a tangent now, responding to one of Colleen's more puzzling statements. I do consider myself rich compared to most of the world. I have a South Indian penpal making $80 a month as a programmer, who shares a room with four other professionals. They moved last year from a room in a house without 'sweet water' (they washed in salt water?) to one without much ventilation or a place to hang laundry. I on the other hand can afford my own apartment, with unlimited fresh water, as well as a half-built house. I don't consider this to be living in poverty even by American standards, which define poverty as earning less than about $15,000 a year for two people (which is roughly what it costs to support two of us in three locations including a hefty chunk for health insurance). I am puzzled as to why she thinks I am 'wealthy' and 'playing at living in poverty'. Perhaps this should be another item in another conference. Poverty is in many cases more related to attitude and education than to actual income/expenditures. #88 of 95 by S. Lynne Fremont (slynne <bio?login=slynne>) on Mon Nov 18 14:21:34 2002: I wanna hear all about your financial situation, keesan, but that is just because I am nosey. #89 of 95 by C. Keesan (keesan <bio?login=keesan>) on Mon Nov 18 15:25:59 2002: Rent $6000/year, property taxes $1200 plus $2400 (after rebate), food for two $800-1200 a year (including 400 lb of citrus), three sets of utility bills but Jim's housemate is paying his this year, health insurance for two about $1600/year (very high deductible and we try not to get sick), dental bills variable at least $500/year.. The $1200 figure includes eating in restaurants once in a while. Do you want a breakdown of electricity, phone, water, internet? Miscellany (gifts, clothing, furniture, appliances, travel, transportation) about $300. Housebuilding expenses also variabl depending how much we get done (up to $1000 per year). Utilities at all three places come to maybe $1000/year including long distance and internet. This all adds up to about $15,000 - if Jim gets rent it comes out lower. If the house is ever built it should save about $4000/year in housing costs. I hope, slynne, that you really meant 'all about' and I am not boring you. We have chosen not to do our own dental work. We don't have computer expenses except for registering shareware. We get our bikes for free. We trade bikes and computers and things to farmers for food - tonight Jim is filling an ink cartridge in exchange for onions and squashes. I will go look up the official poverty level income. #90 of 95 by C. Keesan (keesan <bio?login=keesan>) on Mon Nov 18 15:36:58 2002: Official year 2000 US poverty level varies between states (Alaska and Hawaii are higher) but is about $9000 for one adult living along and $12000 for one adult living with one child. If you split $15,000 two ways I guess we average out $7,500 each on expenses which is less than $9000 each, but if you add $4000 rent it is $9,500 each, or clearly above poverty level (assuming that I am earning, post-tax, what I am spending, and earnings are also variable between years but average out about that). Is there an official Ann Arbor poverty level that takes our high rents into account? #91 of 95 by S. Lynne Fremont (slynne <bio?login=slynne>) on Mon Nov 18 16:10:20 2002: I didnt actually expect you to disclose your financial situation but, as I said, I *am* nosey so I dont find it boring at all. I know that a person earning minimum wage who works 40 hour weeks gets around $10,000 year. I once tried to live on an income like that (it was less though because I only earned $3.35/hr and didnt work 40 hours every week). And yes, I found that it is much cheaper to eat beans than it is to eat steak and it is cheaper to ride one's bike to work than it is to drive. I have to say though that that lifestyle made me miserable. I am less healthy now but more happy. #92 of 95 by C. Keesan (keesan) on Mon Nov 18 17:07:13 2002: So when do we get the details of YOUR current financial situation, Ms. Nosey? ;) #93 of 95 by John Ellis Perry Jr. (jep) on Mon Nov 18 17:14:43 2002: I think the financial disclosures are interesting but not the purpose of this item. #94 of 95 by Joseph M Saul (jmsaul) on Mon Nov 18 18:14:45 2002: I agree, but I feel compelled to point out that Sindi's only told us what she spends, not how much she and Jim bring in. For all we know, cmcgee has evidence that they're stashing $150K per year under their futon or something. I can see where cmcgee is coming from -- keesan does sound like that sometimes. I've chosen to interpret her posts as just being socially clumsy discussions of her own practices and lifestyle, without any real hope or even intention of trying to get us to emulate her. #95 of 95 by John Ellis Perry Jr. (jep) on Mon Nov 18 18:26:15 2002: It's great but this is the cooking conference. If we have to discuss Sindi's (very interesting) finances, I hope we can at least do so in a different item. I will enter one.
18 responses total.
This item is for the discussion of Sindi's finances which started in Valerie's discussion of her invented recipes.
I have spent time with Jim and Sindi, and seen no indications of hidden wealth. I haven't looked for them either, of course. From Sindi's description, I at least spend several times as much as she and Jim combined. I don't apologize for that. I make money and spend it on my priorities. I hold that to be my right. I don't know whether I make as much as they do, or have as much (money) as they do. Why would I care about that? Other than the tendency toward nosiness which I share with slynne. I'll say this, though, when I've gone there to exchange property, it's almost always been so I can acquire some of theirs. I don't apologize for *that*, either. They've freely offered, and thus enabled me to save money I would otherwise have spent. That was my goal, not theirs. Their goal was to avoid adding to landfills. Our goals coincided. It's been the basis for several of what I believe and hope were mutually satisfactory exchanges between us. I think it's evident that Jim and Sindi could make money if they wanted to do that. Maybe they have a big stash somewhere. Maybe I'll cart it off by mistake sometime when I only meant to pick up an elderly computer or another TV, or something. That's a pleasant fantasy, I suppose.
Jim has found nickels and things in computers, but i don't know of any way a kid could stick them into a TV. (We do have a TV that someone returned to us if you do want another one - Jim picked it up and replaced the cord when some recent immigrants asked for one). Since this is the cooking conference, not a conference on finances, perhaps we could use this item to talk about how much money people spend on food and eating, and ways to save money on food, and other food-related topics? Sindi is making money translating. Jim is supposedly building a house. Once in a while someone insists on paying him for something. We both enjoy not having to put in 40 hours a week making money that we have to pay to other people to do things for us that we would rather do for ourselves, like grow, collect, preserve, and prepare food. Some people probably prefer to pay other people to do all this for them. We like our own cooking. We like supporting local farmers. We like not having to go shopping in cold weather. We spend extra for organic food.
I spend way to much money on prepared foods. I would rather spend the money on a cook but that is even *more* money. I guess I just need to marry someone who likes to cook or something :) I like to cook when the mood strikes me but that isnt very often. Even when I want to save money, I end up eating things like pasta (although lately I have gotten whole wheat pasta from the coop) because they dont take a lot of effort to prepare. I am in the canned beans club for this reason.
See, you should have married me.
Can we have a canned bean clubhouse? And, like, a secret canned bean handshake?
and a secret password, like, Hambone makes it better.
I know I should have married you, furs! I still want to have your babies but, if I did, I would probably feed them *canned* beans.
I will use this item to post a few recipes based on dried beans or bean flour. First, you can buy gram (chickpea) flour at the Indian food store on Broadway near where they closed Kroger's and CVS. The bag gives a recipe for tempura batter - mostly gram and some rice flour. We substituted sweet potato flour or cornmeal - anything without gluten. Add water, and it mixes up very easily without the lumps you get with wheat flour and egg recipes, and you can dip vegetables in it for frying. You can also chop up the vegetables and make vegetable pancakes with the mixture of batter and vegetables. Onions, celery, carrots, other things that cook slowly as the chickpea flour should be cooked slowly for 10-15 minutes. Another use for chickpea flour is in potato pancakes. Grate the potatoes, add a lot of chopped onions and if you like also carrots, rutabaga, etc for flavor. Do not drain and squeeze out the liquid as you won't be adding liquid in the form of egg. Instead add enough chickpea flour to get the consistency needed to make pancakes. They taste identical to the wheat flour and egg variety of pancakes (like greasy fried potatoes and onions) and are much easier to make.
Falafel: soak dried chickpeas or fava beans overnight. Set up a 'meat' grinder. I had to use the counter as the table was too thick, and pull out the drawer in order to attach the grinder to the counter top, and then close the drawer part way so the handle would turn, and the liquid generated during grinding leaked out the bottom and tried to get into the drawer but I wrapped a dishtowel around the base of the grinder as a diaper. If you do use a table, put a container on the floor under the grinder. Chickpeas are much easier to grind and come out ground finer. I could not find an easy way to remove the skins from our Chinese fava beans. Mix in water and flour (high-gluten flour worked well, rye flour less well) and knead with your hands, shape into 2" wide 1/2" high patties and fry in shallow oil with a cover on the cast iron frying pan. Turn occasionally. Almost forgot, I added a lot of chopped onions, fresh-ground cumin, and zatar (mixture of thyme and sesame seeds from Jerusalem Market). These smalled and tasted just like falafel except that we left out the salt so they were a lot more edible. Ours were probably also less greasy. Soaked fava beans can also just be fried slowly until they turn soft, or fried even longer to turn crunchy. The crunchy sort are sold dry in packages at the Chinese food store but they are very salty and somewhat stale and heavy on the garlic. I cannot think of any way to use canned chickpeas or favabeans for falafel - you need the discrete little hard chunks to be authentic. I don't know what they do to the mixes other than add a LOT of salt but they don't taste as good and are certainly not as fresh. (Our beans are alive until we grind them up).
That all sounds very yummy. I will have to remember to try that chickpea flour veggie batter recipe in Feb when I have my houseguest who doesnt eat wheat.
just for the rec indian programmers that are of some good earn around 30K to 40K a fresher makes around 10K (just out of engineering/college). This varies but if some one is earnong less than 10000/Rupees 222USD he is incredibly incompetent! I used to be a indian programmer some time back just out of college..my starting was around 30KRupees take home..which is pretty good.. It's a lot cheaper as well in india..so..and im snarf..jennyc is just a account i use when i want great tech support on IRC..
Can you, being a good programmer, change your browser settings to 80 columns, please, so that those limited to that width can read your posting without the lines wrapping (they are 20 columns too long)? Thanks for the info.
set col=130
I don't see how set col=130 is going to make response 12 80 col wide, which is the only possibility for my monitor, and which is default for other people as well.
puTTY will let you stretch your window in M$ Windows
I do not use Windows, or windows. I use DOS or else linux CLI. My monitor does not offer any choice of number of columns and I am not going to switch monitors and number of columns to read an occasional response in which people post in more than 80 columns. Smaller text is harder to read.
I agree. I used to log in using 40 columns and 16 rows.
Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.
|
|
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss