Grex Ing Conference

View Responses

Grex Ing Item 60: Ing conference lurkING item
Entered by scott on Thu Jul 4 20:13:22 UTC 1996:

OK, this is a "roll call" for Ing conference lurkers.  Once I know the
audience, some programming will follow!

So respond here if you read this conference.

32 responses total.

#1 of 32 by scg on Thu Jul 4 21:15:37 1996:

I've been lurking here, or at least keeping it on my .cflist so I get shoved
into it occasionally.

#2 of 32 by rcurl on Fri Jul 5 07:14:00 1996:

I'm a long-time inger.

#3 of 32 by robh on Fri Jul 5 21:20:13 1996:

Yo!

#4 of 32 by rcurl on Sat Jul 6 06:43:00 1996:

Yo, as in Yo-Yo-ing?

#5 of 32 by chelsea on Sat Jul 6 13:56:06 1996:

Or Yo-Mama.  Or Yo-Yo-Ma.

#6 of 32 by freida on Sun Jul 7 02:37:38 1996:

freida checks in...

#7 of 32 by denise on Fri Jul 12 14:59:43 1996:

I've been known to put in an occasional appearance!

#8 of 32 by orinoco on Thu Sep 19 01:05:41 1996:

i've been silently inging on and off for a while now...

#9 of 32 by arianna on Thu Sep 19 01:41:39 1996:

I'm a short time inger.  d=

#10 of 32 by otter on Mon Nov 4 19:41:08 1996:

<otter throws a fish at the fw>

#11 of 32 by scott on Tue Nov 5 17:22:07 1996:

*SLAP*

Mmmph...

Huh?

#12 of 32 by otter on Sun Nov 10 09:59:28 1996:

<just her friendly way of letting you know she's here>

#13 of 32 by scott on Sun Nov 10 14:13:13 1996:

(Right now this is Scott's nappING conference)

#14 of 32 by e4808mc on Thu Nov 14 04:39:48 1996:

this is a surprizING item, since when I joined grex, and joined this
conference no one had entered anything "since" 30 days before that.  I've been
lurking quite a while!

#15 of 32 by redfox on Thu Nov 14 14:20:37 1996:

been gone for awhile, but lurkING again.

#16 of 32 by lee on Tue Nov 26 03:30:06 1996:

I'm still lurkING too...

#17 of 32 by kami on Mon Aug 11 17:56:43 1997:

Gee, I haven't been here since, oh, 1994...

#18 of 32 by orinoco on Tue Dec 30 03:49:47 1997:

If I was inging back in #8, am I reinging now?  The mind boggles...

#19 of 32 by snowth on Thu Jan 1 10:01:04 1998:

I'm here, but lurkING isn't part of my vocabulary. TalkING, screamING,
shoutING, and generally announcING my presence is more my style.

#20 of 32 by orinoco on Fri Jan 2 16:26:46 1998:

...and if I left the conference, I'd be dereinging...whoa...

#21 of 32 by kentn on Fri Jan 9 00:24:15 1998:

...still lurkING (no matter what item I'm in :^)

#22 of 32 by bhoward on Sat Jan 17 06:38:46 2004:

momentarily de-lurking.

#23 of 32 by cmcgee on Sat Jan 17 13:57:20 2004:

uncloaking.

#24 of 32 by scott on Sat Jan 17 17:21:37 2004:

STill the fw.

#25 of 32 by bhoward on Mon Jan 19 03:46:32 2004:

Still de-lurked but fade like the Cheshire Cat.

#26 of 32 by cyberpnk on Fri Feb 6 20:28:31 2004:

lurk, lurk, lurk....

#27 of 32 by bhoward on Wed Feb 18 07:33:47 2004:

So far, we have cmcgee, scott, myself and cyberpnk lurking about.
A fairly thin response to the roll call, indeed.  Perhaps six years
of lurking have ossified the rest of the lot.

#28 of 32 by scott on Wed Feb 18 14:01:14 2004:

It was a rather sparse attendance to begin with.

#29 of 32 by rcurl on Wed Feb 18 15:46:15 2004:

Re #26: that should have been... lurking, lurking, lurking.

#30 of 32 by mary on Wed Feb 18 16:18:54 2004:

When you ask people to check in, you are seeing those willing to respond. 
Responders, if you will.  To see lurkers you'd have to count those present
but silent.  I suppose you could count how many users have ing
participation files used within x number of months.  But hardcore lurkers
wouldn't show up there either, as they'd be observing instead of joining
the conference. 

So, to sum it up, if you want to know who all is here, you're screwed.

#31 of 32 by keesan on Thu Feb 19 01:12:17 2004:

Boo.

#32 of 32 by otter on Fri Apr 9 10:17:25 2004:

Hey! Look! Is that an--
**splash**
-- awww, never mind.

Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.