No Next Item No Next Conference Can't Favor Can't Forget Item List Conference Home Entrance    Help
View Responses


Grex Info Item 145: My Prob
Entered by vishnu on Sat May 14 21:45:46 UTC 1994:

Uh, is there a reason why I can't talk or ntalk
back to the initiator?

Message from Talk_Daemon@grex at 17:44 ...
ntalk: connection requested by bob@is.really.normal
ntalk respond with: ntalk bob@is.really.normal

[Unable to connect with initiator : Permission denied (13)]










-------------------------------------------------------------











?

24 responses total.



#1 of 24 by remmers on Sat May 14 22:14:08 1994:

If the initiator is on a remote system, I guess you can't reply
because you'd be using outgoing telnet and you're not a member.


#2 of 24 by carson on Sat May 14 22:16:25 1994:

(that would be strange, as last I checked, we didn't have a remote
talk-daemon that answered incoming talk requests. Has something changed in
the last month?)


#3 of 24 by scg on Sat May 14 23:13:44 1994:

I've gotten off system talk requests before, and the first was a lot more
than a month ago.  As far as vishnu's problem goes, it was probably
related to not being a member, but is is.really.normal a real address?


#4 of 24 by rcurl on Sun May 15 05:30:32 1994:

/u/rcurl nsquery is.really.normal
nsquery: is.really.normal: Unknown host


#5 of 24 by bubbles on Sun May 15 18:09:43 1994:

When responding to local talk requests, does one really have to type out
ntalk username@grex.cyberspace.org in its entirety?  And if a talk request 
comes in while one is doing something like posting a response, is there a
time limit for getting to some prompt that one can reply from?  (I think
what I did last time was to post the reply in the response I was working on,
then email the person to tell them where to look for it.) 

The WELL has a command call huh that retrieves the last message sent to you,
so you can in effect let sends accumulate and reply at leisure.  And if the
other person has since logged off, the reply is automatically mailed. 


#6 of 24 by mju on Sun May 15 18:18:45 1994:

You just have to type "talk username"; ntalk and talk are the same thing
on Grex, and if both you and the other person are on the same machine,
you don't have to include the machine name.

There's also no time limit to reply, but the other person can abort
the talk connection at any time.  If you reply after they've bailed
out, you may have to wait a few moments while *they* get a talk request,
finish what they're doing at the moment, and reply.


#7 of 24 by carson on Mon May 16 07:31:31 1994:

(now that I've thought about it, I've gotten a talk request from jasmine
on M-Net, but whenever I try to use my local talk program to connect to
someone from Grex, I get a "The remote talk daemon is not responding"
message. I'm using LAN Workplace for Windows' talk program.)


#8 of 24 by vishnu on Tue May 17 01:15:39 1994:

I just said bill@is.really.normal as an example.  It's
not real.


#9 of 24 by vishnu on Tue May 17 01:17:45 1994:

er, bob.  Anyway, it's not just
on remote systems, it is also
on local talk things.


#10 of 24 by popcorn on Tue May 17 03:20:01 1994:

This response has been erased.



#11 of 24 by scg on Tue May 17 03:31:36 1994:

If I'm trying to talk to somebody on Grex, I always leave out the
"@cyberspace.org"  Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't, but
generally if it works locally it works remotely.  It seems to have a lot
to do with what the system load is.


#12 of 24 by robh on Tue May 17 20:28:35 1994:

Folks, remember:  There's something screwy with the actual
program "talk".  Use "ntalk" or "ytalk" instead.

Don't ask me what the problem is.


#13 of 24 by popcorn on Wed May 18 02:16:51 1994:

This response has been erased.



#14 of 24 by bdp on Thu May 19 16:43:08 1994:

I have the same problems with talk locally.  I usually give up and
use "chat".


#15 of 24 by vishnu on Fri May 20 00:14:07 1994:

I can't use talk, ntalk, or ytalk, with
or without the @cyberspace.org


#16 of 24 by popcorn on Fri May 20 04:26:46 1994:

This response has been erased.



#17 of 24 by rcurl on Fri May 20 05:27:42 1994:

I'd like to ask, whenever commands in Picospan are being explained,
whether or not a bang (!) is needed. It has gotten confusing because
more unix commands used in Picospan are being set up to not require
the bang (!). For example, I thought write, chat and talk did - but
do they still?


#18 of 24 by gerund on Fri May 20 08:13:00 1994:

I'd imagine a 'safe' rule of thumb would be:
When in doubt, bang!!


#19 of 24 by davel on Fri May 20 11:03:32 1994:

Or: if you try what someone suggests and it doesn't work, try sticking !
at the beginning & see if that's the problem.

Rane, we try to remember to keep this straight in explaining things, but
it's easy to forget.  This is the kind of thing we sometimes forget ourselves,
without even noticing because we see immediately what's wrong & retype the
command.


#20 of 24 by popcorn on Sat May 21 21:08:37 1994:

This response has been erased.



#21 of 24 by popcorn on Sat May 21 21:09:41 1994:

This response has been erased.



#22 of 24 by rcurl on Sun May 22 05:51:40 1994:

Are there any unix commands that *couldn't* be debanged in Picospan?


#23 of 24 by popcorn on Sun May 22 11:32:10 1994:

This response has been erased.



#24 of 24 by davel on Sun May 22 18:16:05 1994:

That could be dangerous ... but I've often wished for it myself.

Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.

No Next Item No Next Conference Can't Favor Can't Forget Item List Conference Home Entrance    Help

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss