No Next Item No Next Conference Can't Favor Can't Forget Item List Conference Home Entrance    Help
View Responses


Grex Helpers Item 86: Grex System Announcements [linked]
Entered by i on Wed Dec 22 01:44:48 UTC 1999:

This item is for system announcements (new computer equipment on Grex, 
system upgrades, Grex meetings, etc.).  Personal announcements should go 
back in item 2; Grex system *problems* belong in the next item (#4). 

29 responses total.



#1 of 29 by janc on Wed Dec 29 22:20:02 1999:

I've installed a new version of 'nethack' on Grex.  There have been some
changes, including new character types.  Unlike the old version, the new
one is Y2K compliant.

All old saved games have been erased.  Sorry, but they would have stopped
working in the new year anyway due to Y2K bugs in the save file format.


#2 of 29 by janc on Thu Dec 30 04:34:39 1999:

I've installed a new version of the 'elm' mailer on Grex.  The old version
was not Y2K compliant.  Let me know if there are any problems.


#3 of 29 by janc on Thu Dec 30 07:02:28 1999:

Valerie has installed the special Y2K compatible "splishsplash" command.
Try

     !splishsplash

Valeries says she has no clue who Tom is.


#4 of 29 by nayakrg on Thu Dec 30 07:05:26 1999:

wht's going on ?


#5 of 29 by spooked on Thu Dec 30 10:43:26 1999:

splishsplash is very neat - thanks Valerie (:


#6 of 29 by drewmike on Thu Dec 30 15:18:03 1999:

Yeah... though I must admit, I was a little worried. It appears a little too
close to the bottom of the screen for my comfort. They usually advise against
doing that if it's that shallow. Now, if there were a tragic version of it,
I'd be a little happier. Not that I'd get off on the carnage, but at least
it would be a faithful representation.


#7 of 29 by don on Thu Dec 30 15:43:14 1999:

Jan, you might have wanted to wait until 3.3.1 came out for nethack, like I
mentioned in the garage conference. There was a 3.2.3 patch that would have
made the old version Y2K compliant. 3.3.0 has some major bugs, including an
armor bug (with the right (easy to make) conditions, you can wear *anything*)
which can make for some huge abuses (such as near-immortality). But other than
that, 3.3.0 does add some nice features.


#8 of 29 by janc on Thu Dec 30 16:30:44 1999:

We'll install 3.3.1 when it comes out.  Meanwhile, have fun exploiting
the bugs in 3.3.0.


#9 of 29 by don on Thu Dec 30 18:38:01 1999:

Fair enough.


#10 of 29 by tpryan on Thu Dec 30 23:10:38 1999:

        Well, that was fun. Interesting to see in the scroll back.


#11 of 29 by don on Fri Dec 31 01:36:24 1999:

How was that fun?


#12 of 29 by kaplan on Mon Jan 3 19:44:50 2000:

Re 11, I assume that #10 is talking about !splishsplash .  See also 
!macarena .


#13 of 29 by remmers on Mon Jan 10 20:15:58 2000:

The Grex Board of Directors meets this Wednesday, January 12, 7:30-9:30,
upstairs at Zingerman's Next Door, 422 Detroit Street, Ann Arbor. The
public is invited. See Item 150 in Coop (item:coop,150) for the agenda.


#14 of 29 by steve on Mon Jan 17 08:23:20 2000:

   Grex had a disk disaster this weekend, but in the continuing tradition
of managing to squeak by them without actually losing data.

   It started Saturday morning at 10:26, when the disk that holds the
mail directories suddenly became unwilling to talk with the disk controller.
Not suspecting anything out of the oridinary the system came back up
when rebooted and all seemed well.  Although rare, there are times when
Grex crashes for no apparent reason.  Unfortunately I discovered the reason
Saturday evening when I foud the error messages from the disk about its
not being there.  Those messages always fill me with dread, because they
usually bring the winds of disaster with them.  Not long after seeing the
previous errors, the system went down again.  Scott shut the system down
and when I got to the pumpkin Sunday morning, the mail disk appeared to
be fine.  Taking the oppurtunity to make a backup of it while things
all still appeared to work, said backup went fine.  The disk continued
to behave itself, until scg and I started to wonder if the disk simply
hadn't overheated, as one of the side panels to the disk enclosure box
wasn't on, altering air flow.  In the process of testing a new disk for
a new larger /c partition, the mail disk errors came back, badly enough
that the system was unstable once again--with mail data unreadable.  Taking
poor litle sd4h offline for the last time, we unhooked it from Grex and
said farewell to yet another 2G disk.  Using the 'new' disk, we started
a restore of the mail data only to find some bizarre problem with restore,
but found that the interactive version of a restoration worked, and did
that.  Several hours later, after a nice flyby from krj with some cold
Coke, the restore finished, and all looked OK--I saw no problems with
restore, and all the mail files I checked had the correct permissions
and ownerships.  Bringing the system back up resulting in the usual
attack from other sites waiting to dump mail.  I call this a mailstorm
but interestingly this was wasn't as bad as others in the past.  The
highested number of sendmails I saw running at once was only 124, which
was a far cry from the 301 I once saw.  After letting Grex catch up on
mail for a couple of hours it came back online about 11:40pm.


#15 of 29 by jazz on Mon Jan 17 13:58:34 2000:

        Good show!


#16 of 29 by davel on Mon Jan 17 14:09:56 2000:

STeve, you're an alarmist.  "Disaster" means you lost some data.  "Emergency
disk replacement" is more like it.
(And thanks VERY much for managing it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)


#17 of 29 by jiffer on Mon Jan 17 14:27:31 2000:

Thank you!


#18 of 29 by omni on Mon Jan 17 19:05:43 2000:

  Nice Going STeve. Thanks a lot./


#19 of 29 by jazz on Mon Jan 17 21:45:00 2000:

        Non-scheduled drive maintenance.


#20 of 29 by abc on Mon Jan 17 23:31:24 2000:

Job well done!


#21 of 29 by charcat on Tue Jan 18 03:33:44 2000:

thanks, wizards of grex  :)   .


#22 of 29 by steve on Tue Jan 18 20:54:56 2000:

  Ha! Non-scheduled drive maintenance!  Excellent!


#23 of 29 by don on Tue Jan 25 19:34:06 2000:

Where exactly is this linked to?


#24 of 29 by gelinas on Wed Jan 26 04:35:57 2000:

Item 86 in the Helpers conference.


#25 of 29 by valerie on Thu Jan 27 19:08:16 2000:

This response has been erased.



#26 of 29 by steve on Mon Mar 20 18:54:47 2000:

   Grex now has another disk on it for home directories.  It's
called /c just like the old /c, except its about 2.5 times bigger
and will beable to hold quite a few accounts, and we *hope* that
the storage problems we've been having will go away.


#27 of 29 by keesan on Mon Mar 20 19:07:57 2000:

Thanks to all.  At around 2 am when we stopped by to offer Kiwanis leftovers
to grex staffers, Jan showed us around the modem collection etc.  It is very
hot in the pumpkin.  Computers make good space heaters.  I hear that the next
plan is to set up a spare grex computer to do formatting etc. on rather than
having to shut down grex for this.


#28 of 29 by goose on Mon Mar 20 21:37:08 2000:

Filesystem            kbytes    used   avail capacity  Mounted on
/dev/sd0h             284215  240494   15300    94%    /bbs
/dev/sd4a            1944365  773287  976642    44%    /c
/dev/sd1c            1944365 1748977     952   100%    /a

It's great that we got the new disc!  Are we planning on migrating some
things from /a to /c?  And is b/bbs at 94% something to be concerned with?



#29 of 29 by janc on Tue Mar 21 01:27:41 2000:

It is, but we've got a plan....  The old /c partition is now free.  We will
probably be moving a lot of stuff around to shift things to bigger partitions.
Some stuff will probably move off of /a, but the next few reaps will also
help.  All this means more down time will be needed.

We plan to build a second machine for development work and for doing things
like formatting and testing disks.  Unfortunately, we'll need to format and
test a disk for the new machine, and this means more down time for Grex. 
Sorry.

We now have 5 disks and a tape drive on Grex's SCSI chain.  We can't add many
more drives.  We'll want to install a second SCSI controller and put the
drives on two different chains.  We have extra controllers, but have no
experience setting them up.  This is another thing we want the development
machine for.

Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.

No Next Item No Next Conference Can't Favor Can't Forget Item List Conference Home Entrance    Help

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss