|
|
I was reading misc.forsale.computers the other day, and it looked like there was a lot of Sun stuff for sale at reasonable prices. This got me thinking that it might be fun to pick one up to play around with. It also sounds like a better way to have a computer running UNIX than to buy a more powerful PC and spend $800 - 1000 for a 80x86 UNIX. So, any suggestions for what I should look for? What model numbers? How much disk should I shoot for? What kind of monitor? Any suggestions would be appreciated.
78 responses total.
I heard from a friend that someone he knew was selling a sun3/50 for 1500. I think that one is gone.
Most of the Sun workstations you see on the net will probably be "diskless", which means just what its name implies -- the machine does not have a hard disk. (Or, it might have a 40MB hard drive for swap, but this is close enough to diskless to not matter.) Diskless workstations are fine if you are going to be running it in a university computer lab, with lots of other Suns and a master server that it can boot from. However, it will not work well for a home machine. You will probably want at least 150MB of disk, which will probably cost you significantly (i.e., $500 or so) more than a diskless workstation.
Would someone be willing to give a brief overview of what the different Sun machines are like, say, compared to Grex? I'd like to know a little about their capabilities, new and used prices, and the distinctions between them.
That's a good idea, I am kind of looking for a new machine too, but haven't decided on what kind of hardware platform, user interface platform, and operating system.
Here are some of the older Sun's (You won't see many of these for sale
anymore):
Sun-1 family. DOES NOT RUN BSD UNIX. 68000 based. Runs Unisoft
Unix.
Sun-1/100 The original "desktop" Unix workstation. Does not
run BSD.
Sun-1/150 A rack-mount "fileserver" for the above. Does not
run BSD.
Sun-2 family. 68010 based. Two major variants:
Multibus:
sun-2/120 A "tower" system. Limited slots
Sun-2/170 A rackmount "fileserver".
You may also occasionally see:
Sun-2/100U A sun-1/100 that's been upgraded. Really limited
slots
Sun-2/150U Essentially, a /170. May still have sun-1
style keyboard and display.
VME:
Sun-2/50 Actually, more or less an SBD design.
Sun-2/160 (???) VME bus machine.
Here's where my recollection gets a bit scarce:
(But these are all 68020 based machines.)
Sun-3/50 This is a more or less
SBD design. Does support SCSI, ethernet
sun-3/110 desktop workstation w/ color display
Sun-3/160 tower system
sun-3/180 rackmount system
sun-3/280 faster rackmount system
I don't know if anything came out called a "sun-4" per se. However
this would be the sparc chipset -- such as the "sparcstation I"
and sucessors.
Past this, I haven't kept track. It may not make much difference
from the used equipment market yet though.
You should also keep in mind operating systems:
SunOS 1.1 through 1.4 You won't see many of these.
SunOS 2.x You won't see these either.
SunOS 3.2, 3.4, 3.5 (and a rumoured 3.6). These were pretty stable,
and gained a sort of extension on life when
sunOS 4 proved a bit flakey. If you get
a sun-2, this is probably what you will want
to run (ie, 3.5 is probalby the best you can do)
SunOS 4.0 ambitious. Perhaps a bit overly so
SunOS 4.0.1 not quite as flakey
SunOS 4.1(.?) starting to get there.
You should try for documentation as well. Ideally for the version
you are able to get tapes for. The tapes to install an operation
system may be the hardest item to come by.
what about prices? i'm looking at getting a 33mhz 486
from gateway and putting sco unix on it...the pc will
run about $3000 before multiport board and tape backup.
how do suns compare (new prices).
You mean you have all of those machines, Marcus? Are they running?
(-:
Thanks for the info!
My recollection would be a lot less scarce if I actually had them.
But who knows what could be in the back corner of that basement? :)
Oh, your REcollection. I missed part of a word there.
a few additions: in addition to the 3/50 there were 3/60s, too, which were essentially 3/50s with double (?) the clock speed. there also is a Sun 4 series, and they may not all be SPARC machines. There're definitely 4/110s and 4/280s, and the Sparcstation 1 and Sparcstation 1+ are the 4/60 and 4/65 respectively.. Don't know what that makes the Sparcstation SLC.. SunOS was up to 4.1.1 last time I looked, but that's a few months ago.. Also, I believe I've heard of a SunOS 4 version for the Sun 2s, though that may be myth. Given the resources it would need, I can't imagine wanting to run it anyways..
I believe the Sun 4 series are all SPARCs. I also believe SunOS 4 only runs on Sun-3's and better. Sun also sold the 386i, known to its followers as the "Roadrunner" (for reasons I cannot fathom). There were several different models of 386i -- maybe 386i/50 and 386i/60? /120, too? At any rate Sun did not make revs of SunOS higher than 3.5 for the 386i line, although 386i's did include DOS Merge (for running DOS applications under Unix) as well as OpenWindows and, of course, SunOS. The 386i is, of course, an Intel i386DX-based machine, whereas the Sun-[123] all have Motorala chips, and the Sun-4s have Sun's own SPARC chips. You may be able to find a 386i cheaply, though, since Sun no longer supports it. SunOS is now called Solaris (I believe SunOS 4.1.1 = Solaris 1.0), and is sold by a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sun Microsystems, called SunSoft. Sun has announced that SunOS 5.0 (Solaris 2.0, really) will be available for the Intel i386-based machines as well as the SPARC line. SunOS 5.0 will supposedly be based on SysVr4, not 4.3BSD, and the i386 port will be done by Interactive, whom Sun recently purchased from Kodak. (Continuing a bit further on this thread, 4.4BSD will supposedly be available for the i386 when it comes out, and BSD, Inc. (not affiliated with the University of California at Berkeley) will be coming out with a 4.3BSD port to the i386 soon. 4.3BSD/386 will supposedly sell for $999, full source included. (BSDI has rewritten the portions of 4.3BSD that were not publically-available; mostly parts of the kernel. I do not know whether the BSDI-authored portions of their 4.3BSD port will be covered by the same distribution limitations (or lack thereof) that the Berkeley-authored portions are.) Mt. Xinu also has Mach port for the 386, although device support is somewhat slim at this time. I think 1992 will be a very interesting year for the i386-Unix market.)
I hear a lot about Mach, what is it and what machines does it run on.
Mach is an OS kernel developed at Carnegie-Mellon University, whose notable features are modularity and "threads" (or "lightwight processes"). I don't know which machines it runs on, but I believe versions are available for VAXen and the i386.
And the Next, apparently.. SunOS 4.x includes many Mach-like features (particularly lwp's..)
re 12: Is that the same SunSoft that wrote those really really cool videogames for the Nintendo? I've been SO addicted to Blaster Master ...
I doubt it.
Re: SunOs 4.0 and the Sun 2 :
Incorrect. Sun 2 machines may run sunos 4.1.1 (The last version of
sunos that supports the Sun/2) only if they have the newer (revision 1.0) or
later Roms (256k instead of 128k.)
It is discouraged however, and it requires 4 meg of ram just to get the
eggbeater in the air. On a machine with a 7 meg limit, this is a pretty
serious drawback.
I'll sell you a Sun/2 just like Grex's but with st506 drives and a qic-02 tape. How much do you want to pay?
I might be interested in buying the tape drive, if the price was right..
What is a 'right' price?
Items in two conferences. SHeesh.
I don't know, especially now that I learn my car needs $450 in transmission repairs (actually, a re-build..)
I talked to a friend in CA a couple of days ago, about equipment for Grex. It seems that the price on Sun 3/50's has fallen to the $600 and below class. Sun 3's are now dead, dead, dead in the "real world" thanks to Sun's rather bizarre policy of absolutely pushing their customers into Sparc stuff. Bad news for customers, but probably very good for us folk...
Now, if we can just fine one with enough VME slots and VME-to-multibus slots; we can actually move the systech card, & the 9 track tape over to the sun-3; and we'll be doing quite nicely. We can also put SCSI disk here on the sun-2, and move that over to the sun3; or if we can find enough of those adaptors, move the xylogics card and the SMD drives over as well. Lots of wonderful upgrade opportunities, if we play our cards right, especially as prices drop.
I think the cheapest Sun-3 that has VME slots is a 3/110; that has three slots. The next bigger is a 3/160, with six slots.
I finally got ahold of someone who knows, and he says that there is 'little or no chance' of making imbedded scsi work on a sun/2s scsi bus. He suggested that the best arrangement that ever came out of that was a fast esdi controller and sunos 3.5.
Now thats interesting. I've been looking at SCSI documentation lately, and I can't see any reason why it won't work. The important thing is that the drive is at least SCSI-1. From everything I've read, SCSI-2 works on SCSI-1 controllers. There was a mac based newsletter that tried this out for Mac's, and found that to be the case? Could there be someting in the Sun-2 that gets messed up?
I don't know much about both of them, but I was told by the tech-reps of some distributor that it doesn't work. I bet they had not tried a workaround, maybe by switching some of the signals.
As long as your SCSI-2 device doesn't use "wide" SCSI (i.e., a 16-bit wide bus), it should work fine with a SCSI-1 host adapter; you just won't be able to use any of the special SCSI-2 features.
Is that the only difference, all same control signals otherwise?
Thats what the documentation says. Mustafa, you're saying a tech-rep said this about Suns? This could be important to us, so if you have the oppurtunity to check this out again, please do. Grex can use SCSI disks; with the continuing availability of cheaper units, its only a matter of time before I stumble upon a dontation of some sort.
No, they said it in general attaching SCSI-2 disks to SCSI. My question was specific to a full SCSI host adapter to be connected to a SCSI-2 device. The SCSI-2 units were a hard disk, and some sort of CD-ROM drive, I think. It is a while back, so I remember the HD part of it. They said that the connections were different, and I accepted that as SCSI and SCSI-2 not being compatible. I don't know how many of the pins on a SCSI connection are free, and if those are used by SCSI-2 for 16bit transfers. I don't have neither pin assignments available. The UofM computer center documentations may cover that.
I just talked the other day to the head of sun in brazil (whose office is here in SF,) he claims that in all his experience he has never seen an imbedded scsi drive on a sun-2, and rarely even on sun 3's. He said that Sun reprograms the roms on the scsi drives that they resell, and that the most common configuration for Sun 3's was a 141meg ESDI with an adaptec board. Hm, that's the same thing that the other guy told me abotu sun 2's. He also indicated that the maximum memory that should be installed in a sun/2 is 6 megs. He stated that this was a design limit.
It might be the design limit, but I've seen the /usr/adm/messages output from a 7M machine. I've heard that with some work you can get 8M in such a machine. But I'll personally settle for six.
I get six working all the time. I can't seem to get 7 working right. I have grown skeptical about information from sun.
Do you get parity errors that don't make sense? Did your blackplane come wired with eight slots for P2, or what? I thought that only six slots were wired P2 from the factory. It was my understanding that the first conflict came somewhere in the 8th meg of memory, as thats were the Sun video card would normally live. But at least you can have six meg in; that gives me some hope that we can do the same here without a blackplane rewiring session.
That was seven meg with the 4 meg ram card installed. No, my 2/170 has 6 slots and the 2/120 has 5 slots wired together, as usual.
So you had 1 4M card and 2 1M in place? I've kept on hearing about putting memory cards on either side of the CPU card. Thats what I did for Grex when we got the extra memory up. <mem> <mem> <cpu> <mem> <mem> is the current arrangement. You did something like this?
|
|
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss