|
|
Today I've been thinking about disk drives. I would love to buy a matched pair of 10k rpm SCSI drives because they're so fast. I'm sure they'd make a machine feel much faster, especially once the RAM started to fill up, but they're so expensive that it's not going to happen ($2.80/Gb Vs $0.38/ Gb for SATA). Looking at the Spec. sheets, even basic 5,400 rpm ATA drives are much faster than anything I'm running now. I'd thought about getting 5,400 rpm because they used to be quieter, cooler and less thirsty than 7,200 rpm drives. These days there's not much in it. With today's drives, SATA isn't significantly faster than parallel ATA, but I envisage PATA going the way of ST-506/ MFM eventually. PATA would work with my existing mainboards, but SATA would move more easily to a new machine. In theory I could shove an SATA card into a PCI expansion slot, but then my PCI bus gets choked with data that ordinarily (in any decent mainboard) bypasses it. I'm not sure what to buy.
4 responses total.
Even 10k drives are now quieter than 5400 rpm drives used to be, in my experience. Most modern 7200 rpm drives are extremely quiet -- the noise is way below the noise floor created by the power supply and CPU fans. The annoying high-pitched whine I remember from my 5400 rpm drives is basically gone. 10k drives need more cooling, though. There's only so much that can be done about that -- at that speed a significant amount of heat is coming from aerodynamic friction.
If I won the lotto I'd buy a Cremax Icydock.:-) Yesterday I was looking at specs and the 7,200 RPM drive was actually slightly quieter than its 5,400 RPM counterpart, perhaps because of newer technology. The 7,200 RPM drive was a little more thirsty and it may run warmer too.
Pretty much all the wattage that goes into the drive comes out as heat, so that's a safe assumption.
My brother's computer's HD has "crashed" (he says). He had not backed it up so wonders if he can still read files from it. I presume there must be an adapter to use it as an external drive and then just read the files from it. Is this practical? I presume it would depend upon the catalog and other files needed to read from the drive being OK, which might be the case if only the system files are corrupt. What say?
Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.
|
|
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss