|
|
> this sux....one ?. why do you charge us? you say it's to send out news > letters right? you can do that by e-mail right? then why do you charge > us? they don't charge ann arbor grexers!!! it's not fair! The above message was left by classified (mulder) on Mon, Aug 7, 1995 (15:48). It can be seen as response number six, item two in the grexohio conference. There has been much discussion, questions, and concerns pertaining to donations to GrexOhio. I understand that some people are opposed to the idea. This is why I placed a question concerning donations in the original membership application and questionnaire you were sent and hopefully responded to. The general feelings of those who responded were noted and most of you said that you wouldn't mind. If any problems should arise or you have new concerns, please respond to this item and I will try to address these concerns as soon as possible. Thank you.
10 responses total.
robert! take a chill!!!! your making this such a big fricken deal! it's dumb!!! okay! just chill on it!!! please!
and if you don't like the tone of that the screw you!
Thank you for your responses, Emma. However, this item was not created for you. This item was created so that others with the same thoughts can voice their concerns and we can hopefully come up with a solution that everyone can agree with. Another thing, Emma. Could you please create a new item by typing 'enter' at the Ok: prompt next time you have an urge to talk about something that is not relevent to the matter at hand? Thank you.
i ment the whole grexohio thing was dumb!!!!!! your making it such a big deal!!!!!! do people know what your gonna do with the donations if it falls through??? i hope you tell them!
If it falls through, which I hope it doesn't, the remaining ammount will be divided equally among the members unless. Either that, or some other fair solution will be discussed. However, no donation money will be spent until elections are held for the office of Treasurer.
you told me you were gonna keep the money....and you were bribing me to sending it in ASAP and you threatened me if i didn't get it in by monday <today.>
Yes, because you are/were (depends on how upset you are) my friend and I was joking with you. And to reply to threatening you, that was a joke too and you are weel aware of that. Please stop twisting my words to your personal gain. And truth be known, the threat was that I'd call Emma up on the phone and say the word "booggyman" to her when our conversation turned to the topic of superstition in which I do not believe. Yes, Emma, today is Monday, and have I called you to speak those words to you? No. have I had the opportunity? Yes, we have talked on the phone at least 3 days today. Now the one thing I am not clear on is the "bribe" you were speaking of. Since when did I bribe you? What did I bribe you with?
Excuse me, but I meant to say that I have been on the phone with Emma 3 *times*, not days, today. Sorry for any confusion. :)
Geez, guys! CHILL!!! It seems obvious to me (I think) that we just kind of have a huge misunderstanding here and it's causing big problems! Emma, if you are so worried about the funds, would you consider running for treasurer?
Item 3 has been frozen. For information related to original topic, please see item 5. Questions? Please e-mail 'grexohio'.
Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.
|
|
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss