|
|
Whatever happened to Nick Pruswagio? Is there no end to the swirl of rumors that encompass and refine the mortal debate that ensues regarding the morass of obfuscation that both delimits and expands the controversial engines of doubt and fear mongering that surround the oft-treacherous revisory capitulation to greed and botanical revisionism? Sometimes I despair.
6 responses total.
Have you thoroughly read the Wikipedia article? That may help you deal with the existential dilemma you have created.
The author of the Wikipedia article is a scoundrel, with vested interests left undisclosed.
Are they greedy and botanical? Perhaps if we focus on the moral debate we can fill the whole garden with FUD. I'm afraid the mortal debate is moot. You know, ........... and then you die.
I may have a line on Nick Pruswagio's whereabouts. Stay tuned.
adjusts the little tuner along the copper wires wrapped around the toilet paper roll.
Nick Pruswagio, having leapt the boundary between clarity and doubt, is now ensconced in a profitable middle ground, reaping the benefits of his escalatory strategy and fastidious tactics. The world awaits the cornucopia of treasures that will accrue from this fortuitous happenstance. If there is a downside, it is of no concern to anyone except perhaps to those benighted souls who wallow in doubt and self-effacement. May art, science, and commerce benefit from the fulsome inundation of Nick Pruswagio's serendipitous and deliciously inventive manifestation.
Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.
|
|
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss