|
|
A single tree among the wood
Has earned a special place,
For in its bark I carved my name
And that of tender Grace.
In summers past we tarried there
Beyond the city's din,
A picnic basket we would bring
With lots of good stuff in.
Beneath the tree we'd munch our snacks
And speak just what we felt,
Anticipating ruined choirs
Where late the songbirds dwelt.
The forest mice would gather round
And hum a pretty tune,
The forest moose might stop by too,
Though hopefully not soon.
The mountain stream would run its course,
Though in another place,
For our wood was in a plain
Far from the hills' embrace.
When Grace would turn and say to me
"When we are old and gray..."
I vowed to love her in December
Just as I had in May.
As sign of my undying love
To last throughout my life,
I carved our names upon the tree
With my Swiss Army Knife.
"Forever then," said Grace aloud,
"I'm yours for all of time."
Amazed was I at Grace's speech,
Recorded in this rhyme.
So if you travel through the wood
And chance upon this tree,
Take note of our eternal names:
Amazing Grace, and me.
15 responses total.
Good work again, remmers. <general is impressed by remmers more and more all the tiem.> er time.
Well, this is the first piece of John's that has impressed me, but it has impressed me indeed...
Yes it is very impresive...I think (a tradition poem) implied that soeone else had writtenit.
Nope, I accept full responsibility. By "traditional" I meant that it has a traditional form. I'm curious what aspects of this impress people.
(I should say I accept full responsibility except for four lines that are lifted from other sources. Of course, even for those, I'm responsible for using them here.)
I like it, too, for its many humorous touches. I especially like the mice, the moose, the Swiss Army Knife, the picnic basket with lots of good stuff in... The whole thing, in fact. The more I read it, the more I like it. I also have the feeling, as I do with many of Remmers's creations, that I'm missing something.
I liked it because it was simple, and quaint... romantic, as a change of pace from much (but not all) of the stuff around here. Not the slightest bit pretentious, which frankly is how I read most of your stuff, John... either like you're ridiculing everybody else or trying to state some cosmic etherity in as obfuscated a style as possible. This poem, in contrast, is sweet,, and that's all. *shrug*
I suppose it would be more logical to move the 3rd stanza to make it the 5th stanza.
Ah. That makes it much less pretentious and ridiculing. Btw, John, is this copyright 1996 by John Remmers, or can I sign my name to it and send it to the New Yorker?
Yes, it's Copyright (c) 1996 by John H. Remmers. Thanks for asking. On the other hand, there's some logic to leaving the 3rd stanza where it is, as the first part of it ties in with what precedes. Decisions, decisions...
heh, sounds like somehting out of my englisg book at school, not necessarily bad, considering those people are supposed to be the best!
What impressed me about this one? Well, it's sweetly endearing without being too over-emphatic about love. As if you were simply stating a fact, not begging it to come true, or shouting to the world about your love for Grace. Also, it sounded almost 3rd person, not as if you were the one professing your love. But then, that may go back to the simplicity of the overall statement that was made.....I like it lots. <=
The meter is very similar to a poem that I think remmers once used as
the Mysterious Quote, which begins..
My childhood's home I see again,
And sadden with the view;
And still, as memory crowds my brain,
There's pleasure in it, too.
The feeling of it is also similar - a lament for lost love (or childrhood).
What I like is the simplicity of the meter, words and story: economic
expression. However I thought there were a few jarring notes, like
the Swiss Army Knife (and a touch of "somewhere in this favored land..").
By the way, did anybody spot the "borrowed lines" in this?
I like it, but it has more to do with the meter, and the subconscious part of my brain which refuses to tell people why it likes or dislikes certain works of art. Prose is a little bit different - sometimes, the writing could be terrible, but I'd still like the story.
Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.
|
|
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss