|
|
|
In this item I shall insist that all responses be germaine.
It is forbidden not to respond to this item. If your fair-
witness deems a response unsuitable, he shall censor it by
asking others to disregard it.
Please enter your response at this time.
23 responses total.
EnIgMa sucks D00D EnIgMa sucks D00D EnIgMa sucks D00D EnIgMa sucks D00D EnIgMa sucks D00D EnIgMa sucks D00D EnIgMa sucks D00D EnIgMa sucks D00D EnIgMa sucks D00D EnIgMa sucks D00D EnIgMa sucks D00D EnIgMa sucks D00D EnIgMa sucks D00D EnIgMa sucks D00D EnIgMa sucks D00D EnIgMa sucks D00D EnIgMa sucks D00D EnIgMa sucks D00D EnIgMa sucks D00D EnIgMa sucks D00D EnIgMa sucks D00D EnIgMa sucks D00D
You people aren't well.
Response #1 is highly appropriate; we should all take it to heart. I have reservations about #2, and would ask if its author is a medical practitioner or therapist qualified to make such judgements.
While I'm here, I'd like to commend the author of #3 on his thoughtful, insightful response.
I commend the author of response #6. That must be the most insightful observation of the human condition vis a vis Lincoln Logs that I have ever seen.
Lincoln Logs sux D00D
I like robh's pseudo. =)
Robh's pseudo, or lack thereof, is not really germaine to this item, so I'd like to ask folks to please disregard #7.
[md hugs birdlady] It's okay. Doc Snord has been a little grouchy ever since his disillusionment over the Lincoln Logs, is all. He's really a nice old geezer once you get to know him.
He needs to get his prescription refilled.
I met remmers when I was in A2, and thanks for the hug Michael. =)
Response #2 is appropriate, as its author has no standing as a medical professional, to the best of my knowledge. Reponse #10 does not have that saving grace and should therefore be disregarded. Thank you for your time.
I pity the author of response #14. Have you no shame?
not a shred.
I must say that response #14 looks much better from below than from above. Hindsight is always superior!
Please disregard this response.
Please disregard this response, but pay close attention to the previous one.
Please disregard the two former responses, the two responses following this response, and immediately following your disregard of the aforementioned responses, please also disregard this response. thank you.
I would compliment you for your commendable attention to
the serious issue of order in the avoidance of logical
circularity, but it would be useless to do so in this
response, for reasons that should be obvious.
Please also disregard this response as well. Thanks very much. Shall we sing a round?
Let's! Ding dong merrily on high...
No Ding-Dongs. Ho-Hos, remember? And you shall buy *my* Ho-Hos, for they funkily satisfy. Then I shall continue to eat you all and Ann Arbor.
I'm fissioning.
Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.
|
|
|
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss