No Next Item No Next Conference Can't Favor Can't Forget Item List Conference Home Entrance    Help
View Responses


Grex Enigma Item 168: A Perfect World -- Your definitions
Entered by vidar on Mon Apr 4 02:09:33 UTC 1994:

Please use this item to enter your idea of a perfect world.  Feel free
to be as sick and blood-thirsty as you want, including types of people
you'd want wiped from existance.  I'm sure everybody has a general
idea of my idea of a perfect world.

24 responses total.



#1 of 24 by vishnu on Mon Apr 4 02:17:20 1994:

Without desires.


#2 of 24 by bdp on Mon Apr 4 03:26:48 1994:

Think of how boring that would be though.


#3 of 24 by gerund on Mon Apr 4 05:12:53 1994:

re #0: no, some of us don't.  Want to tell us?

My idea of a perfect world would be hard to define, especially since I'm still
trying to figure out what perfect is.


#4 of 24 by rcurl on Mon Apr 4 05:13:50 1994:

A perfect world would have to include a lot of imperfections, or it
would not be perfect.


#5 of 24 by vidar on Mon Apr 4 18:49:58 1994:

Gerund, well for one thing, my attitude towards Christianity is volitile.
That might give you a few clues.


#6 of 24 by gerund on Mon Apr 4 19:37:10 1994:

re #5: keep going.


#7 of 24 by orinoco on Mon Apr 4 19:50:01 1994:

A perfect world would be what we have now, only more so.


#8 of 24 by gerund on Mon Apr 4 20:29:25 1994:

Re #7: If I understand you correctly then you are saying a perfect world from
your viewpoint would mean more violence, more traffic jams, more sickness,
more cases of AIDS, as well as more of all the 'good' things in our world?
Our world is obviously not perfect, and  I guess if I understand
you you're saying it needs to be even more nonperfect, then it will be perfect.
I think I need a little clarificati^Non.


#9 of 24 by vidar on Mon Apr 4 21:41:50 1994:

Look, gerund, we want each person's definition of THEIR perfect world.
I admit I should have named the item "YOUR perfect world", but I did not.
I just want to get people's opinions on what THEY would call a perfect
world.  I'll admit I'm being a bit rude, but I am trying to make a point
even if my point is a source of drift.


#10 of 24 by gerund on Mon Apr 4 21:51:06 1994:

re #9: asking for clarification, as in #8 is not drift.  I mearly want to
understand what is being said.


#11 of 24 by vidar on Mon Apr 4 21:52:27 1994:

Okay... Forget I said anything.


#12 of 24 by gerund on Mon Apr 4 21:56:07 1994:

Obviously I don't understand something, but as it seems to be causing a
problem, I'll shut up.


#13 of 24 by carl on Mon Apr 4 23:52:15 1994:

My vision of a perfect world would be one where I would be able to
react appropriately to at least 99% of what happens around me.  Stuff
like putting one foot in front of the other and keeping my balance
in the process (heck, I wouldn't even expect myself to chew at the
same time ;-).  For that other less than 1% I'd like to be able to
respond to the people and things and awarenesses that I perceive.

In a perfect world, I'd be able to choose how I understand life.
I'd be able to learn, to grow, and to be creative.  I'd choose for
myself values to respect and "masters" to learn from.  I'd be able
to feel varying degrees of connectedness as I became more aware of
myself and others, and I'd trust that my feelings are my truest 
guide.

In a perfect world, I'd become responsible and able to respond.  I'd
choose where to invest my time and energy.  I would take care of myself
and my community the best way I knew how, and would feel good about
every action I take and thought that I think.

In a perfect world, I'd balance myself between boredom and excitement.


#14 of 24 by carl on Mon Apr 4 23:53:25 1994:

Oh, and did I forget to mention a better connection with the Internet?


#15 of 24 by sirnose on Thu Apr 7 03:27:14 1994:

I think in a perfect world, everyone would be named Picard, but look like
Mariana Sirtis... Oops. Sorry. I don't know where that came from... 
CD's would sure as heck be cheaper, though.


#16 of 24 by none on Sun Apr 10 14:34:04 1994:

And people would have names that make some sense....


#17 of 24 by cain on Tue Apr 12 02:14:08 1994:

In a perfect world, Singapore would make the punishment fit the crime.


#18 of 24 by other on Thu Apr 14 17:52:57 1994:

Ok, two lashes instead of six!  Six for reckless endangerment.


#19 of 24 by kentn on Thu Apr 14 22:43:50 1994:

and seven for feckless engenderment



#20 of 24 by other on Sat Apr 16 07:26:04 1994:

And eight for forkless gendarmes!


#21 of 24 by vidar on Sat Apr 16 12:53:08 1994:

And religion would be outlawed.


#22 of 24 by orinoco on Tue Apr 19 22:43:51 1994:

And ten for genderless armed forks!
And Ben's for kender-less farm orcs!
And Ben's a ork-free kender farm
erm, orc
And Ben's oaktree lent her arms!
And...


#23 of 24 by lee on Thu May 22 19:29:19 1997:

"If you could come back and take out the five people who had caused you the
most misery in your life, who would they be and why?"

"I only get five?"

Practice makes perfect but nobody's perfect so why should we practice?

<lee is still thinking about the perfect world>
No worries, carefree, no problems?


#24 of 24 by jaklumen on Tue May 28 07:32:03 2002:

sick.. blood-thirsty.. wiped from existence..

The Mack is Eating Ann Arbor.

Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.

No Next Item No Next Conference Can't Favor Can't Forget Item List Conference Home Entrance    Help

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss