|
|
An item for the discussion of solar power in the home, including solar panels that heat water, panels that generate electricity and also use of "passive solar" design.
28 responses total.
In a few years my house will probably need a new roof. If we don't outgrow the house and like it, the neigbourhood, city and school district enough to stay there for at least five *more* years, I would like to have photovoltaic (PV) solar panels installed on the new roof to generate electricity for use in the house. I expect we will need the panels, a charge controller, a bank of batteries, at least one inverter and perhaps some sort of grid tie-in so that we can sell any surplus electricity to the power company. Any constructive comments or advice would be welcome.
Look for some solar-power organization where you live to ask if you can sell power to the 'grid' and what they pay, and whether it will come even close to breaking even. Solar hot water is probably cheaper to install. We could put you in touch with someone here who sells and installs the panels (a friend) and has some unusually cheap models made and used in China.
"breaking even" in terms of the cost of the grid-tie, or the complete system? I have seen a house not far from here that appears to have solar hot water panels. I've no idea how well that works for them, or how complex it would be to install.
Why not ask the owners? Jim's neighbors took out their system and gave him the solar panel. The only solar to electric setup I know of here will probably never pay for itself. They are doing it to prove it can be done. Eventually panel costs will come down. Batteries only last 10-20 years and are expensive. Usually the power companies only pay you some minimum rate, much less than they are charging at the same time (during summer peaks it can be 5 to 1). Unless you are running a central air conditioner, you will have summer excess power if you try to put in enough panels to get anything in winter (especially in Michigan where winters are cloudy).
I have heard that thin-film developments will help to bring the cost of photovoltaics down. If selling electricity is not practical then I suppose we might have the option of going off-the-grid, eliminating the need for the grid tie but perhaps requiring more battery capacity to take us through the night. Hopefully it will be a few years before the roof really needs replacing, so the costs and benefits seem likely to change before I have to make a decision.
You need to plan for several cloudy days in a row, and for not having much sun in December.
I wonder whether ordinary water heaters object to having warm water fed to them. If the tank were fed via solar panels, it might require less energy during the sunnier parts of the year. I suppose during the winter it's that much more pipe to heat though.
Insulate the pipes. I think it is standard practice to solar preheat water going to the main tank.
I plan to insulate many of the pipes here. I'm told that heat tape is standard issue too because of the cold, but I have yet to use that.
Heat tape will waste more heat (electrical) than would have been lost from the pipes: instead, insulate.
Or insulate OVER the heat tapes.
Re #11: I'm told that's the usual procedure here. So far I've not done it and there was only one brief time when the pipes froze, with a wind from the West. That reminds me I should get insulating before the cold sets in.
What's the situation that your pipes can freeze? Most homes in Michigan are built so that pipes will not freeze (actually, the water in them) if the home is kept at a normal living temperature.
If your pipes are in the crawl space, insulate the crawlspace walls. You can put foam boards on the outside and cover them with stucco (or maybe cement board). Is there any pipe insulation? Around here, many dirt-floored crawlspaces were dug deeper to become basements.
Re #13: I can think of several places where the (water in the) pipe may have frozen, including a run along the inside the garage's west wall. I need to insulate that pipe as soon as I can get to it and perhaps keep an eye on the temperature on that wall. Re #14: Some pipes are in the crawlspace, including one that reverberates horribly after a toilet is flushed. The crawlspace has no freeboard because the house is flush with the ground. The crawlspace is really more of a pit dug under the house. I should install some thermometers in the crawlspace.
Does it snow there? Here crawl spaces have to extend at least a foot above ground. Areas with more snow probably require more than that. Why is your plumbing going through the garage, and can it be rerouted through the crawlspace instead? What is a freeboard? I will ask Jim what might be making the noise. Water hammer occurs when valves are shut suddenly but toilets usually fill slowly.
Some toilet valves shut off quite suddently, and could cause water hammer. There should be a damper in the pipe network somewhere. Water can feeze in pipes without bursting them. Pipes only burst when water freezes after being trapped between fittings in which water freezes first.
Re #16: it snows here enough to spend hours shovelling snow. Freeboard is the side of a boat between the waterline and the gunwhale. In this context I used it to mean the part of a house between the ground and the floor. Come to think of it, we have a front door step, but when you subtract the thickness of the floor, there's probably little if any freeboard left and that's all brick anyway. I'm glad the pipe runs along the inside of the wall rather than through the crawlspace. At least I can get to it to work on it.
If I could scrape together enough money to fix up this house (but not enough money to just bulldoze it and build something new), I would ideally have a solar hot water panel for faucets, shower etc, another for underfloor radiant heat and at least one photovoltaic array for pumping water out of the ground. Not sure how much of this is practical given Illinois' climate.
It is possible to heat a house even in a northern climate with solar heat (although they do apparently use some propane). I dont know how well such a system would work in Michigan or Illinois where it is cloudy for much of the winter. http://www.solarhouse.com/
With enough insulation the normal activities in the house might generate enough warmth.
And moisture....
New technology seems to have worked out the moisture problem http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/27/world/europe/27house.html
We dehumidify all winter. Cooking with a pressure cooker does not generate much moisture (or heat).
Dehumidifiers also add net heat to the house (an observation, not an argument). However they do not remove accumulatikng CO2 or CO or other toxic gases. The technology slynne cites in #23 is very good - for retainng heat and eliminating accumulating moisture. However it does not work in reverse - for cooling - as suggested. People and all activities generate net heat. Nothing generates net "cool". The suggested heat exchanger could allow air circulation with the inside cooler than the outside, but a refrigeration system would be required to make up for the inefficiencies of the heat exchanger.
Would it be possible to allow circulation in the summer with the heat exchanger portion turned off? That would work in places where it gets cool at night.
You might as well just open windows at night. But yes, you could bypass the exchanger at night and use its fan to circulate air.
Perhaps there's a reason forced air and refrigeration are the default option here then. :-/
Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.
|
|
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss