|
|
I think the participants here would tend to agree that letting another person have their own beliefs, and respecting their right to think what they want, is a Good Thing. But how much intolerance is acceptable in the name of tolerance? In some religious debates I've seen recently, I've been struck by how nastily some belivers in freedom of religion have ranted against Christianity, for example. If a proponent of religious freedom meets a proponent of converting heathens, is it more hypocritical to let them keep converting rather than fight for what you belive for, or to tell them that their way is Wrong?
8 responses total.
I see nothing wrong with me (an atheist) telling a theist that I believe they are wrong. I don't see that as insulting or condemming (sp?), nor am I insulted when theists tell me that they think I'm wrong. I have nothing against Christianity any more than I have against any other forms of (IMHO) mythology. To a point, I feel that if theism helps people get through the day, then more power to them. But contrary to the supposed numbers (95% of American society are theists, I've heard), I think more and more people are beginning to question theism, and require evidence for something this extraordinary (see Carl Sagan). I think more and more people are agreeing that society as a whole has a long way to go evolutionarily, and that its time to move away from more primative modes of thought. I mean no offense to anyone
By the way, Dan, good item. :)
Interesting, but I think you may have missed the original question somewhat. The idea was not just whether it is wrong to try to convert theists, but trying to make theists stop converting others.
The only time I would actively resist others preaching or converting is if they were doing it in a way that really disturbed me, such as waiting until I'm right up next to them, and deciding at that instant to yell as loud as they could to the whole plaza that we were all going to burn if we didn't accept Jesus as our lord and savior. This has happened to me before, and I turned to the guy, after collecting my wits, and yelled fairly loudly, "That hurt my ears!!" He apologized and I walked away. Otherwise its just in one ear and out the other. I don't even mind people coming to my door. I think as long as people are civil, and polite, they should be able to voice their opinion, no matter how strongly I feel they are wrong.
People converting to other religions out ot their own free will is okay. But what do you do when prosyletizers(the people who do the conversion) exploit the weaker position of others to impose their religion on them? In India, in the past, the mughal rulers converted entire villages and cities to Islam after capturing them. In recent times, Christian missionaries go to tribal areas where the people are neither educated, nor aware too much of the outer world and give them food, medicines, construct homes for them, and then demand that they convert to christianity in order to continue receiving the benefits like these. I do not think Christs teachings included doing such acts. By such conversions, both the missionaries and the tribals lose their character.
Missionaries come in and feed them, give them health care and homes, and whatever else in return for their conversion to Christianity sounds like a good deal to me. Everyone invests in a religion for some type of personal gain whether that be a sense of being a good person, or being part of a special group, or to go to heaven, or have somewhere to go on Sunday morning. I think these poor folks hit pay dirt, myself.
What if it went the other way? Say you'r a poor decrepid Christian and a Muslim comes over and offers you food, medicine but only if you convert.
Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.
|
|
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss