|
|
Got back from a week at a major US banking conglomeratation - bank formed from lots of little banks eating each other. Somewhere in 'upper management' it was decided to have an e-commerce/Internet security type come in and look over the planned move of one online application from one major US city's data center to another and my name came up. (Not sure of my exact reputation among the marketing types, I'm told its 'real no nonsense cut to the chase problem solver' but I think thats just more because I am not a marketing type although I have played such in the past - anyway I seem to get called in on a lot of problem accounts.) -No written plan of attack. Made them all sit down in a conference room with all four walls being whiteboard and remote site via VideoConference/Speakerphone (very nice facilities actually) and diagram out the testing phase, QA, and the final move in as much detail as they could along with stars next to unanswered questions (minor details like what is the process for each ISP in each city to switch the DNS entries to point to the new physical/IP location). -System Admin types at the new location were being blocked by the corporate web proxy server from visiting 'bad' sites, such as most all the Internet security sites. I suggested that since they controll the firewalls at the new site, they set up a private proxy server behind it for their own use and bypass the general corporate one. -Despite the private banking security group's warning about the 'DOS' attack potential last year (August '99) it wasn't until the recent well publicized attacks that they scanned their own systems. (Over lunch with the worker-bees I found out that they found a number of 'zombies' but were adopting a 'mushroom' approach to their 1st line management on acount they weren't sure that the recently fired en masse staff of the data center that the application is being moved from might have had something to do with it. Or even that it might have been them looking at the technology with no bad intent.) -Internally, with the exception of WINS and Novell workstations there is no centralized Name Service (DNS). While this is not necessarily a bad thing from a security standpoint, the hand editing of files on lots and lots of systems is inefficient and has the potential for mistakes. I suggested they look at 'supper' a public domain solution to the problem. -A recent chartered 'Internet Bank' that was started up offering higher rates on CDs and other savings accounts along with no fees found that some 70% to over 90% of the 'new' customers depending on the brief studies were 'cannibalized' from their own existing 'brick and mortar' customers - they were eating themselves. -little understanding of the way SSL works. The concept of becoming their own certificate granting authority never occured to them. And thats just one institution. Now maybe I only see the 'problem children' to I overgeneralize to assume things about the overall population, but Whats-Her-Name's experience with the merger of BunkoOne and First Chicago where after using Quicken for years it suddenly stopped working and nobody at the 'new' bank could tell her why (I can, but they haven't called me to pay me money to do so...) leads me to belive that this whole e-commerce thingy is a lot more fragile than most institutions would want you to believe. (Whats-her-name is switching to CitiBank where at least its totally free and can't be any worse.)
9 responses total.
(Oh, and the BunkoOne problem? Simple. You distribute a new version of the software which unless you read the documentation about saving old setting (who reads windoze doc? its all plug-and-play right?) results in your revoking your ID on the front end server. You call support and have the password reset and on your first attempt to use it, it forces you to change the password (good security for sure, now the tech support pern doesn't know your password). Now of course your new password doesn't match your old password on the backend processor where all the sexy data is secured that you want to get to and you try three times and your ID is once again revoked. You call support, who can only reset your ID with a new password... yadda yadda yadda) (I watch the whole thing on the proxy server logs that whats-her-name uses from the house network, even try to explain to the tech support person who hasn't a clue what I am talking about as its not in her 'play book'...)
Revoking passwords after N failed attempts is just asking for DOS attacks.
(hmm... it sounds like that old .plan [is it still around?] that would show how many cans were left in the machine if you fingered it. I assume you wouldn't have much control over what goes into the oven, but it's still pretty cool to see things like temperature and all.)
Now linked to cyberpunk, your conf to discuss security & computers and society..
So, what's all this mean inre online banking? I use online banking with only minor (but aggravating) problems or errors. I probably like least that questions and suggestions sent to them on their e-mail page don't go to a bank person but rather the techie guru, who is otherwise semi-illiterate, and takes his conduct lessons from Dilbert.
What it means is that in general the people making decisions about your 'online banking' applications haven't a clue. For example, the 'mamagment' of the online banking appication I alude to in #0 are a week away from 'go live' with its move from one major midwestern city to another major midwestern city without understanding and resolving the fact that its network access to the 'Internet' is in fact going from a 700K T1 to about a 56K T1 or less as measured- so its users are going to experience greater than 10 times slower access (both are full T1 circuits which should be 1000K or so). They think they are going to meet their target date. I get lots of money to yell at them that they are not.
What, someone's overprovisioning internet connections in the corporate
sector? Never!
I opened an account with Net.B@nk, reachable at www.netbank.com, I'm not really sure this qualifies as on-line banking, since all I use the net link for is monitoring the clearing of checks and ordering refills when I run out of deposit envelopes or checks. (No check printing charge, for that I can live with green safety paper.) I make deposits by endorsing checks with a rubber stamp I made from a DIY kit, stuffing them in a business reply envelope, and dropping said envelope in the first handy mail box. THe interest rate, while seemingly not so hot, works out to much better than I've ever gotten at any other bank. I investigated thier on-line payment system, and left it to gather dust when it turned out I had to get more information about my various payees than I already had. The only place I routinely send a check to at a street address is the local paper carrier, and the payment system requires street addresses.
I pay almost all recurring bills online. It does save time. Some bills are the same amount every month, so I never have to think about those. Most require entering a new amount each month, which is pretty quick. No checks, envelopes, stamps, etc required. I do not use it with Quicken, however. I don't keep track of my finances on a computer, at all. I used to also balance my checkbook to the penny, but don't anymore, though I do check the online transactions, and the few written check records, with the monthly (paper) statement. Every once in a long while there is a transaction error, which I can catch this way. The online program, by the way, is called Allegro. It is more like Adagio, however.
Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.
|
|
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss