|
|
I recently had my check rejected at the supermarket (at least, they made me rewrite it.) The check was for $12.55, and I wrote "12.55" in the box after the "$" on the check. On the next line I wrote: "twelve and eleven twentieths" Now, what's wrong with that? Might the bank reject such a check?
16 responses total.
I can tell you right off the bat, that the written part *MUST* match the dollar amount or it is not a legal ch. As long as the written part, the dollar amount, the date, the account number plus bank number appears on the check it is considered a check, and you can write it on *ANYTHING*. Oh, yeah, you also must sign it.
You used to be able to write a check on anything...not so sure any more. If they have to give it special processing, they'll likely just reject it. I don't blame the grocery store for rejecting that particular check. What would probably happen is that the bank would pay the lower of the two amounts as they interpret them in their haste. which is to say, the bank would pay 12.11 to the store and they'd lose 44 cents. They don't have to take a check from you *at all* and I'm sure they lose a fair amount to bad check artists. It pays them to be careful about the form of the checks they receive. If they are at all suspicious (don't think you match that ugly driver's license photo or don't like the way you look away when they compare the two) they should think twice about accepting anything other than cash. Stick with the 100ths format...
I have a moral objection to unreduced fractions. I always thought the point of writing the amount two different ways was just that - if you write it two different ways, it's harder to change it later. Therefore writing it two *very* different ways ought to be even better.
This response has been erased.
This response has been erased.
Re 5: Well, that's a good reason to write the entries in two very different ways. That allows more error recovery. If my 5s look funny, then ".55" and "55/100" will both look funny, and might be mistake for something else. But "eleven twentieths" can't be mistaken for something else without something other than a 5 being funny.
Don't tell us your argument. Call the bank and argue with them. Good luck.
If, according to a hamburger chain, many people think a 1/4 pounder is bigger than a 1/3 pounder (4 > 3), we'd better stick with the "standard" way of writing checks to keep confusion, not to mention mistakes, down to a minimum.
Mark,
If you have a moral objection to unreduced fractions, you'd better learn to
deal with cash! <grin> or get one of those cards that does electronic
check stuff, where you don't have to write anything.
Pattie
When I was traveling out west, in small towns, the stores would have blank checks from the local bank which they let anyone use to write a check. I told this to somebody I was having lunch with, and a stranger nearby said he did not believe it and as a challenge offered to write me a blank check for $40 and he would sell it to me for $20. I said, if he could verify where he had a bank account, and write his check on a paper bar napkin (with the funny jokes on them), and sign to match his driver's licence, I would buy it. He even offered to write his checking account number on it. I bought it from him, went to his bank, tried to cash it, had to talk to the manager, he asked me what the number was on the check, I said 'he wrote his phone number on there because he would be out of town', and he cancelled and cashed the napkin (and I presume sent the cancelled napking to the guy). (He had tried to trick me by putting down the wrong account number. They didn't care what the number was, apparently.) There is also a classic story of someone objecting to paying his taxes, who wrote the check out on a cow, and the party had to accept it. (French story, I think). SO you need the bank name and signature. I made $20. ANd had the satisfaction of imagining him opening up his next checking account statement.
So now you wander from luncheonette to luncheonette betting people the bank would cash a check written on a napkin....... 8^}
I am not sure I would try that again, 25 years later.
You definitely need a transit number for the bank now, at the very least.
As a former proof-operator, I recommend against using anything but hundredths. Even when done by hand, there isn't time to convert fractions to decimals.
(I *thought* this look familiar....I guess my memory runs back at least six years....). I would think the argument could be made that checks must be made out in the basic units of the currency. Those are dollars and cents. The $ 12.55 is not a decimal number by that logic, it is a convention for writing the number of dollars and the number of cents. When England had pounds, shillings, and pence, 12 pounds plus 55 pence would have been written 12.4.7 (or more often 12/4/7).
True, but not necessary: the cent is well-named. ;) I'd not recommend writing a check for "2 dollars, 2 bits", either.
Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.
|
|
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss