|
|
The Online Film Critics Society's "Top 100 Overlooked Films of the 1990s" It was the decade of Tarantino and Titanic. From Schindler's List to The Blair Witch Project, movies and the hype that went with them seemed bigger than ever. However, too many great films somehow got lost in the shuffle. While some were recalled by Oscar voters and many managed to squeak out a modest box office return, these films nonetheless failed to click in the memory banks of both the critics and with audiences. The writers of the Online Film Critics Society recalls the half- and completely-forgotten treasures of the past decade cinematic canon with its list of the Top 100 Overlooked Films of the 1990s. Join us for a trip back into the not-so-distant past and see if you recall the titles celebrated here by the OFCS writers: http://www.listsofbests.com/list/92
3 responses total.
I have seen a good many of those. I have liked the ones I have seen.
Interesting list. I wish I could find an explanation of how the rank order was arrived at -- what does being #1 actually mean? Total number of votes? Average of individual ranking? Something else? In any case, several of the first 10 films in the list are among my favorites from the '90s also: "Miller's Crossing" (early Coen Bros. film, and one of their best), "Safe", "Sweet Hereafter", "Waiting for Guffman", "Hudsucker Proxy", "Fearless". Looking down the list, I spot a few more personal favorites: "The Straight Story", "Hamlet", "The Spanish Prisoner", "Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me" (lots of people hate that one, I like it), "One False Move". Movies that are big with critics or audiences at the time of their release are not necessarily the same movies that stand the test of time. Hitchcock's "Vertigo" got little attention when it first came out; now it's a classic. Similarly "Psycho", which did good box office but was hardly an unqualified success with either the public or critics in 1960, the year of its release. I expect that a number of the films in the "List of Bests" list will come to be regarded as classics (some already are), long after lots of the "big" films of the '90s are forgotten.
Good question; to know how this kind of rank works.
I'm not quite sure these lists reflect the truth. I don't
understand how exactly criterion and selection of films
work but I realized these lists are very unjust because take
into consideration only production market U.S. movies and
because [besides] there are a lot of great films which wasn't
classified there.
It's interesting to note this list "The Bad Cinema Society's
The Worst Films" - http://listsofbests.com/list/54/ - talk
about the worst films, however, sincerely I don't believe the
critics would indicate "Natural Born Killers" or even "Heaven's
Gate" as a bad film.
Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.
|
|
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss