No Next Item No Next Conference Can't Favor Can't Forget Item List Conference Home Entrance    Help
View Responses


Grex Cinema Item 62: Grex goes to the movies-- the Spring Movie Review item
Entered by richard on Sun Mar 21 03:30:25 UTC 2004:

This is the movie review item.  Have you seen a good movie lately at 
the movie theater?  Have you rented a movie lately?  Have you bought a 
movie on ppv lately?  Have you watched a good movie on cable tv or 
regular tv lately? 

Whether you like a movie or hate a movie, BE CRITICal, write about it 
here! 

278 responses total.



#1 of 278 by richard on Sun Mar 21 03:43:53 2004:

ETERNAL SUNSET OF THE SPOTLESS MIND-- This is the new movie from 
Charlie Kauffman, who wrote the wonderful movies "Being John Malkovich" 
and "Adaptation".  This one is just as offbeat and original.  Jim 
Carrey and Kate Winslet are this couple who have a two year romance and 
a really bad breakup.  Then she goes to this doctor's office that is 
offering this new procedure-- they can erase the memories of the person 
you broke up with from your mind.  So it can be as if they never 
existed.  So she has the procedure and all of a sudden can't remember 
Jim Carrey.  He can't handle that, so to get back at her, he decides to 
have the procedure too.  Much of the rest of the movie takes place 
inside Jim Carrey's head while he's having the procedure done, slowly 
having all the memories of Winslet and his romance with her erased one 
at a time.  He flashes back to different scenes in his romance with 
Winslet and watches them slowly disappear.  Finally confronting in his 
mind the question of whether he REALLY wants all memories of her to 
disappear from his mind.

I found this to be a very poignant and thought provoking movie.  Surely 
anyone that has had a relationship end really badly has fantasized at 
one time or another about, "I wish this person never existed!  I wish I 
never met this person"  

This flaw in this movie is that this, the central idea, is not 
workable.  Even if you can have this operation and have all your 
memories of a person you were in a failed relationship with erased, you 
can't erase the memories of the people around you of that person (i.e. 
your friends and family).    

Also I don't buy that the ending is realistic, but I won't give that 
away here.  But that aside, this is a really well directed and well 
acted film. I think it might be both Carrey and Winslet's best work.  I 
give Charlie Kauffman credit for again coming up with a really 
distinctiev idea for a movie.  On the whole, I recommend this movie.


#2 of 278 by richard on Sun Mar 21 10:13:57 2004:

oops, I mistyped the name of that movie!  The movie is called

"Eternal SUNSHINE of the Spotless Mind"   Now why when I typed it before it
came out sunset instead of sunshine I dunno, I hope it doesn't have deep
psychological signficance or anything  :)  


#3 of 278 by twenex on Sun Mar 21 11:53:30 2004:

Creepy.


#4 of 278 by giry on Sun Mar 21 13:45:00 2004:

Agora 8 <-> Cinema 62


#5 of 278 by slynne on Sun Mar 21 21:35:19 2004:

Yeah, I am looking forward to that movie. Hopefully I will have time to 
see it next weekend. 


#6 of 278 by tod on Mon Mar 22 17:04:27 2004:

This response has been erased.



#7 of 278 by mcnally on Mon Mar 22 17:38:32 2004:

 Mix them all together and you could have a truly memorable scene where
 Julie Andrews and the Von Trapp children call down a napalm strike on a
 bunch of serial-killer zombies..  (Yo-de-lay, yo-de-lay, yo-de-lay-hee-hoo!)


#8 of 278 by tod on Mon Mar 22 17:50:37 2004:

This response has been erased.



#9 of 278 by twenex on Mon Mar 22 18:02:43 2004:

lol.


#10 of 278 by gregb on Mon Mar 22 19:05:41 2004:

I haven't seen this version of DOTD yet, but from the trailers, it 
looks like nothing more than a gore-fest.  The '70s original version 
was much more suspenseful.  The saying, "Less is more," certainly 
applied here.  Particularly in regards to the pacing.  This new 
version moves very fast, the zombies are on you in a sec., there's no 
time for soaking in what's happening.  The original was just the 
opposite.  That's not to say there wasn't any action, there was.  But 
it happened on spurts, relying more on things moving slowly.  "Night 
of the Living Dead" was the same way.  This is the version I reccomend.


#11 of 278 by grexmom on Mon Mar 22 20:47:36 2004:

I am looking for the name of a movie, that mocks the Godfather movie 
genre.    According to a student I know; there is this one scene where 
some woman eats tons of gas producing foods ( eggs, broccoli, etc) and 
then lights a match lifts her leg and blows of the side of a building.  
Does that sound familiar to anyone?  If so, what is the name of that 
movie? 


#12 of 278 by tod on Mon Mar 22 20:50:04 2004:

This response has been erased.



#13 of 278 by grexmom on Tue Mar 23 02:23:27 2004:

Thanks Tod :)


#14 of 278 by happyboy on Wed Mar 24 17:51:01 2004:

IAHB "Dawn of the DEad" beat "Bravechrist" at the boxoffice
last weekend.


#15 of 278 by tod on Wed Mar 24 18:15:44 2004:

This response has been erased.



#16 of 278 by happyboy on Wed Mar 24 18:32:41 2004:

ROSIE PALM!


#17 of 278 by mcnally on Thu Mar 25 17:40:22 2004:

 The BBC is reporting
 (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/3563405.stm) that Monty Python's
 "Life of Brian" will enjoy a theatrical re-release this year and be marketed
 as an alternative to Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ."

 I find the idea to be in amusingly bad taste and support it for no better
 reason than that it's sure to offend a lot of people who could really stand
 to have their buttons pushed. 


#18 of 278 by other on Thu Mar 25 17:41:30 2004:

What mcnally said.  (#17)


#19 of 278 by albaugh on Thu Mar 25 17:56:02 2004:

"The Passion of the Brian"


#20 of 278 by gregb on Thu Mar 25 17:59:17 2004:

"The Passion of the Fruit"


#21 of 278 by albaugh on Thu Mar 25 18:01:47 2004:

"The Brian of the Fruit"


#22 of 278 by tpryan on Thu Mar 25 18:07:23 2004:

        And in Life of Brian, you do see the Full Monty Phyton.
(oh what a beautiful morning).


#23 of 278 by tpryan on Thu Mar 25 18:09:43 2004:

        And a thank you to George Harrison for coming to the 
financial rescue of the Phythons, who had fundig for "Brian"
cut days before filming was to begin.


#24 of 278 by bru on Fri Mar 26 03:48:20 2004:

The jewish suicide squad rocks!


#25 of 278 by parcel on Fri Mar 26 03:55:07 2004:

YEAH


f*r


#26 of 278 by gregb on Fri Mar 26 14:16:25 2004:

I picked up the "Ausstin Powers: Goldmember" DVD recently and I'm not
happy with it.  Not because of the movie itself, that was OK.  No, it's
because of the "Infinifilm" stuff.  It disabled my scan and pause
functions, which means I have to stop the disc, which means I have to
start watching from the beginning of the chapter I was in, which is
ANNOYING!  This is the only DVD I have that does does this so I'm
certain Infinifilm is the culprit.

Has anyone else had similar experiences with Infinifilm DVD's?


#27 of 278 by gull on Fri Mar 26 14:32:59 2004:

I had the same problem with that DVD.  I hope this kind of
control-freakery doesn't become more common.  It reminds me of when
Disney used to disable all the controls during the 'preview of coming
attractions' segment, so you had to watch it all the way through every time.


#28 of 278 by tod on Fri Mar 26 16:49:33 2004:

This response has been erased.



#29 of 278 by klg on Fri Mar 26 17:08:39 2004:

From the story of Hanukah:

The family of Mattathias became known as the Maccabees, from the Hebrew 
word for "hammer," because they were said to strike hammer blows 
against their enemies.


#30 of 278 by gregb on Fri Mar 26 17:14:08 2004:

Re. 27: Do U remember which Disney DVD's did that, so I can avoid them?

For those who want to avoid Infinifilm films, they include:

     Blow                Friday After Next
     13 Days           Goldmember
     Rush Hour 2     John Q
     15 Minutes       Destination 2



#31 of 278 by krj on Fri Mar 26 19:59:36 2004:

This response has been erased.



#32 of 278 by krj on Fri Mar 26 20:01:36 2004:

Rather than derail the discussion of the content of what's showing
on the movie and video screen, I'll start the new incarnation of the 
copyright/napster items.


#33 of 278 by edina on Fri Mar 26 20:04:37 2004:

Snarkiness need not apply.


#34 of 278 by soup on Mon Mar 29 01:44:01 2004:

This response has been erased.



#35 of 278 by maryeliz on Mon Mar 29 03:57:10 2004:

Okay i just saw "Dawn of the dead" today and i thought it was pretty good.
I didn't see the original and before today i didn't even know there was an
original. I suggest that if anyone has interests in horror movies that you
go and check out this movie.


#36 of 278 by krj on Mon Mar 29 05:57:12 2004:

We stumbled over "What A Girl Wants" on HBO last night and watched 
it all the way through; then went out today and rented the DVD so we 
could see the first 20 minutes.  Rather a decent piece of Hollywood 
fluff, as a 17-year-old American goes off to Britain in search of 
her absent aristocrat father, played by Colin Firth.  Jeff would 
probably object to all the British stereotypes.


#37 of 278 by twenex on Mon Mar 29 13:52:44 2004:

They oughtta make a film full of American stereotypes, and see if the people
who moan about Brits who moan about British stereotypes laugh on the other
side of their faces.

Just saw "Love, Actually." Quite good, actually.


#38 of 278 by gull on Mon Mar 29 15:16:10 2004:

Re resp:37: Aren't most films full of American stereotypes?


#39 of 278 by gregb on Mon Mar 29 15:26:29 2004:

Re. 37: Actually, it's been done, sortof.  Martin Mull did a
"mockumentary" back in the '80s called "The History of White People in
America."  It was full of WASP stereotypical traits and such.  Quite
funny, as I recall.


Next 40 Responses.
Last 40 Responses and Response Form.
No Next Item No Next Conference Can't Favor Can't Forget Item List Conference Home Entrance    Help

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss