|
|
There is currently a project underway to produce three movies based on JRR Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings trilogy, each movie roughly corresponding to one of the books. Releases are expected in summer 2000 Christmas 2000, and summer 2001. Curious to find out how other people feel about this undertaking. Pop quiz: Which category do you fall in? [I'm in category B] A: Movies would spoil my imagined world of Middle Earth B: Movies would not spoil my imagined world of Middle Earth C: Didn't like the books anyway D: Haven't read the book(s) E: [This space intentionally left blank] Some relevant URLs: http://www.xenite.org/faqs/lotr_movie.htm http://lotrmovie.tolkien.nu/
14 responses total.
Correction of release dates: Christmas 2000, summer 2001 and Christmas 2001. (they are pretty much up in the air anyway)
When I read Lord of the Rings, Gandolf sounds like John Houston
and Bilbo sounds like Orson Bean.
I like hearing the distinct voices in my head when I read.
E: My mind is open. A great trilogy of LoTR movies could be produced without being especially faithful to Tolkien. I'd love to see something great made from a literal reading of the books, though.
I'm hearing that Sean Connery is Gandalf.
How would you cast LOtR if money were no object? Here are some names that come to mind: Aragorn -- Kevin Costner, Liam Neeson, Mel Gibson Arwen -- Geena Davis Theoden -- Paul Newman Boromir -- Arnold Schwarzenegger Saruman -- Al Pacino Elrond -- Anthony Hopkins Galadriel -- Helen Mirren Gollum -- F. Murray Abraham, Samuel L. Jackson Tom Bombadil -- Roberto Benigni, Tom Conti Goldberry -- Drew Barrymore Sauron -- Marlon Brando, James Earl Jones Frodo -- Michael J. Fox Samwise -- Dustin Hoffman
Here's an actual list from the website: Eowyn:-Mira Sorvino Frodo:-Elijah Wood Gandalf:-Sir Ian McKellen Gimli:-Brian Kline Gollum:-CG (Peter Woodthorpe) Legolas:-Jude Law Pippen:-Billy Boyd Sam:-Sean Astin Wormtongue:-Jeffrey Combs
(I think when I said "Arwen" in #5 I meant Eowyn.)
Answer B. That's good news. Reading a great book like this one, then seeing the movie results (in my case) in 2 visions of the work, while seeing the movie first prevents from making my own vision. I would advice anyone who didn't read it to do it before :).
This made me laugh out loud. (From http://www.eonline.com/) "Sources say [Liv] Tyler [who plays Arwen] is showing signs of strain after two months of strenuous, nearly continuous filming on the Helm's Deep set. She reportedly freaked out when Orc armies charged her. 'She just sat on her horse and screamed,' the source said."
Aagh. how can they do this? I love the books and have read them all about 4 times. There was a cartoon/live-action film made of about the first half of LoTR about 15 years ago by Ralph Bakshi, and it was great, but it still didn't quite capture the essence of the books. Turning into a fully live-action film with well-known actors will IMHO totally ruin the experience of LoTR for anyone who's not read the books yet. Plus, I can't stand Elijah Wood - and Frodo isn't a kid, he's meant to be about 51 when he sets out from Hobbiton! Why can't they just leave good books as they are?
Is this stil an actual topic? .
Sure, if anybody wants to talk about it. "The Fellowship of the Ring" comes out in a couple of months.
I read and enjoyed the Ring trilogy (the first volume not long
after it was published in the 1950s) but wouldn't characterize
myself as obsessive about Tolkien stuff. So it wouldn't hurt
my feelings if the movies turned out to be crappy. There's
reason to hope that they won't be, though. The trailer for
"Fellowship of the Ring" looks pretty good, and the director
of the trilogy is talented New Zealander Peter Jackson
("Heavenly Creatures", "Dead Alive").
The one thing I can say good about this movie is that
does follow the book well, and creates a world of its own.
And what makes it all even more ridiculous is how
serious this is all taken, like it's real or something.
The story is so full of plot holes that, when the
actors take it so seriously it compounds the absurdity.
The book is sexist and racist and embodies an ethos
and morality that aretruly objectionable. Jackson has
captured all of this and added an uniquely New
Zealand stupidity.
Conclusion: this trilogy is an useless pastime except
to enjoy the special effects and action scenes which
are particularly spetacular and best of all time (if
you don't fall asleep waiting).
Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.
|
|
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss