Brazilian city approves annual Orgasm Day


A city in Brazil has approved an annual Orgasm Day.

The 35,000 people in Esperantina will be asked to work harder to achieve
sexual satisfaction each May 9.

The new law was passed by the council despite the objections of the city's
Mayor, who says it is pornographic.

It is the idea of Councillor Arimateia Dantas, who says he has personal
motivation after losing out in love because of premature ejaculation.

He said: "My ex-partner was very hot, but she took such a time to reach the
orgasm that I couldn't wait for her."

He undertook a research survey among Esperantina's sexually active women and
found only 28% enjoyed orgasms every time they have sex.

The Mayor, Jose Inaldo Franco, is against Orgasm Day. He told the Jornal do
Brasil newspaper: "I am ashamed of this pornographic project."

40 responses total.

        What do they do to celebrate?

heh, one can only imagine

I don't think that I necessarily *need* to orgasm every time I have 
sex.  What is it about men wanting women to orgasm every time?  I am 
usually perfectly happy to accept orgasm if it comes and to do without 
if it doesn't.  One friend of mine actually said that sex without 
orgasm is a lot like a really good massage.  I agree with that. Sheesh!

I believe it was Sarah who said that in the last sex cf-- right?

Anyway, I thought Brazilians were oversexed anyway.  You can get full 
frontal nudity right on local television, and we all know about the 
thong.  I just laugh at the idea some city is having an Orgasm Day.

        I think it's more a sign of America's sexual repression that we don't
have nudity on television.

I do too.  Violence is okay; sex isn't.  I know which I'd rather have my kids
emulating (if I had kids)...

Yes, I said that.  I can't believe you remember *I* said that.

What I would think is the case, Julie, is that they either want to feel as
though they accomplished something or because they love you and want to make
you feel good.  I feel the same way when I'm with a guy.  I want him to
come...over and over again.

        I used to want that from my partner, now I want, ideally, to really
expand their horizons or meet fantasies they didn't know they had, or, for
more ordinary sex, to just have a real good time.

I think part of it, too, is that men usually feel like sex is incomplete
unless they've had an orgasm.  It's not that much of a jump to project that
attitude onto your partner.

oh my, people.

at least one orgasm is really not all that much to work for is it?! of course
you wan to "expand their horizons or meet fantasies they didn't know they had,
or, for
 more ordinary sex, to just have a real good time" but it seems to me like
an orgasm would be a natural side effect of that .. 

there are time when i simply cannot come, but really i'd expect to in most
cases. in most cases i would feel unfulfilled .. not all. and thats
physically, not emotionally.

well, there's always proper foreplay to consider and mr. happy hand

come again?

<sigh> book on EMO states that the best way to just relax is hands 

Aw, Oval.  Bad pun for this item.

EMO=Extended massive orgasim

        Re #10:

        Well, it's a general case.  If all it takes for you to have an orgasm
is a considerate and patient partner, then you're lucky.  Not every woman is
equal in that regard.  Sometimes it's physiology, sometimes psychology. 
Either way, some people just have a harder time than others, and attempting
to push it will wear on both parties' nerves.

        It's totally possible to meet a fantasy without an orgasm.  Fantasies
don't even have to be completely sexual.

resp:5  I'm not sure I 100% agree with that, although I think if we 
were less repressed, we might have more depictions of happenstance 
nudity in situations that were not sexual, such as pregnancy, 
breastfeeding, etc.  I don't think I agree gratituous sexual nudity is 
a good idea.  Neither is gratituous violence, either.

hmmm, up the nudity and tone down the violence?  hmmm..

resp:6  what do you mean?  would that include your little Johnny 
boinking little Jane down the street?  I suppose that idea would 
necessitate a discussion on if media violence encourages children to 
be violent, and likewise, media sex encourages children to have sex.


resp:7  Credit should be given where credit is due.  It was 
noteworthy, and therefore, the speaker was worth remembering too.  
Now, as per se resp:9, if only I could adopt that attitude, I think 
I'd be a bit more satisfied.

On the other hand, I really love to snuggle.  I like sex, but I also 
enjoy merely having nice, warm female in my bed who loves me a lot.  
In my present case (and thenceforth) it's Julie, whose warm body also 
reminds me of the precious child that is coming very soon.

resp:16  Why do you think some people roleplay?  C'mon, you didn't 
think all those scantily clad young females at conventions were purely 
happenstance, do you?  Well, then again, I should mention just them.. 
you look at anyone dressed up, and this is meeting a fantasy.  Hey, at 
our last convention, there was a BDSM demonstration and forum.

        Huh?

        And what kind of conventions are you talking about here?  The only one
I regularly attend is Convocation, which is a good way to track down my old
Pagan buddies.  That doesn't feature "scantily clad young females".  The local
dance clubs do, however.

There are a few scantily clad young females at ConVocation. Not the bulk, but
some.

        I missed the last one.  I'M ALWAYS MISSING THE GOOD PARTIES.  DAMMIT!

it's ok john. i have the spame problem.

i guess i am lucky. but i wan't always .. 

We are discussing Role Playing Conventions here, in which case there 
are frequently young ladies dressed in the ever-popular chain-mail 
bikini and other interesting costumes.  

        Ah ... I'm assuming you're referring to the RPG and LARP geek-niches,
and not BSDM role-playing?  Both feature chain-mail bikinis.

wtf, i've yet to see a bikini chian mail chick at the rpg cons i go to
that's for those sci-fi freaks.

        Aren't most sci-fi freaks kinda ... uhm ... nasty?

prolly.

Well, actually most sci-fi freaks are disturbingly normal.  The nasty 
ones are generally rare and only into sci-fi for the conventions and 
all that they entail.

I'll bet you anything that the BDSM discussion and demo Jon mentioned 
was put on by one of those rare nasties.

I didn't mean that giving someone multiple orgasms is ALL I go for.  It just
makes me feel good.  I also enjoy the communication and laughter and playtime.

that is a bonus.

I'll say it again-- snuggling is good.

I likes to snuggle.

re #29- I think they're meaning nasty as in really really not 
attractive and really not people you would want to see scantily clad. 

'Course I could be wrong.

        Yes, yes ...

Oh yes.  The particular example in question-- the BDSM folks had a 
setup at the dealer's booth.. 40-something women.. nasty, nasty, nasty.

Well, I *think* I meant nasty as the opposite of nice.

        It is.  Either someone looks nice, or they look nasty. :)

Okay, okay.  I think I was refering to personalities, but Jon confirms 
your assessment.  These characters were distinctly nasty lookin'.

..however, it should be noted that the slave and master walking around 
weren't too bad looking.

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss