|
|
Welcome to the Spring "Mysterious Quote" item. In this item, somebody (usually whoever won the last one) enters a quote from a novel or other book. Other people try to guess the author. That's about all the rules, I think.
215 responses total.
Since remmers gave me the option to enter the next quote, and because I had a neat quote standing by, here it is: " The room contains a few dozen living human bodies, each one a big sack of guts and fluids so highly compressed that it will squirt for a few yards when pierced. Each one is built around an armature of 206 bones connected to each other by notoriously fault-prone joints that are given to obnoxious creaking, grinding, and popping noises when they are in other than pristine condition. This structure is draped with throbbing steak, inflated with clenching air sacks, and pierced by a Gordian sewer filled with burbling acid and compressed gas and asquirt with vile enzymes and solvents produced by the many dark, gamy nuggets of genetically programmed meat strung along its length. Slugs of dissolving food are forced down this sloppy labyrinth by serialized convulsions, decaying into gas, liquid, and solid matter which must all be regularly vented to the outside world lest the owner go toxic and drop dead. Spherical, gel-packed cameras swivel in mucus-greased ball joints. Infinite phalanxes of cilia beat back invading particles, encapsulate them in goo for later disposal. In each body a centrally located muscle flails away at an eternal, circulating torrent of pressurized gravy. And yet, despite all of this, not one of these bodies makes a single sound at any time during the sultan's speech. It is a marvel that can only be explained by the power of brain over body, and, in turn, by the power of cultural conditioning over the brain."
<blinks>
Sounds like Douglas Adams' style.
That it does. Also a little like Tom Robbins, but I don't think it's him.
Interesting to read, since I am now listening to Mr. Methance.com CD.
That's Neal Stephenson, from "Cryptonomicon".
That was quick. Yes, Stephenson, so mcnally is up next.
As it happens, I ran across a quote last night that I thought was
suitable, although I suspect the author may be quickly identified..
Anyway:
"When I was young, I went to the theater at the nearby shopping
center and watched a movie about a talking Volkswagen. I believe
the little car had a taste for mischief but I can't be certain,
as both the movie and the afternoon proved unremarkable and have
faded from my memory. <H> saw the same movie a few years after
it was released. His family had left the Congo by this time and
were living in Ethiopia. Like me, <H> saw the movie by himself
on a weekend afternoon. Unlike me, he left the theater two hours
later, to find a dead man hanging from a telephone pole at the far
end of the unpaved parking lt. None of the people who'd seen the
movie seemed to care about the dead man. They stared at him for a
moment or two and then headed home, saying they'd never seen anything
as crazy as that talking Volkswagen. His father was late picking
him up, so <H..> just stood there for an hour, watching the dead
man dangle and turn in the breeze. The death was not reported in
the newspaper, and when <H> related the story to his friends,
they said, "You saw the movie about the talking car?"
Beady?
What?
re #9: heh.. not unless the Chicago stuff is all a cover story..
Spring 2001 agora 17, The Spring Mysterious Quote item, has been linked to books.
(and to the games conference, although I forget the item number.)
agora 17 <--> poetry 245
{I need to forget this item in agora.}
i would like to state that these are much larger than "quotes" nd in actuality they are whole paragraphs. let me remind you a quote is not a paragraph, but a single sentence.
But the Mysterious Quote item is supposed to give you enough of a sample of the writer's prose for you to tell who it is, either from the style or the subject matter or from other clues. It shouldn't be something you recognize merely because it's famous, but it shoudn't be obscure and without any identifiable characteristics, either. Harder than you think to find such quotes.
Right. I think by "quote" here we mean "quoted passage", which can in principle be of any length. I don't think the game would work if restricted to one-sentence quotes.
Also, I have no clue who the author of the quote in #8 is. I assume the movie referred to is Disney's "The Love Bug" from 1969. If the author was a kid at the time, that would make him or her around 40 now. So definitely a contemporary author, fairly young.
David Sedaris
If it weren't for the age of the author and the location of the scene, I'd guess Marquez. Seems his style of existentialism. (BTB, I've never heard "quote" used in a way that would imply such a length restriction. I thought the terms "quotable" and "quotation" were much more common. Maybe that's my educational background, but academic sources use paragraphs as quotes all the time -- and call them that... go read a style manual.)
#20 is correct, the author in question is David Sedaris. It's from his book "Me Talk Pretty One Day", though it may also have been used in one of the monologue pieces he does for the public radio show "This American Life." I'm not quite sure what to make of the book. Sedaris can be quite funny in smaller doses, but his unpleasant alternating nastiness and whininess are too much for me when reading an entire collection of his pieces at once.
Darn, that book is sittin gin my to be read pile right now. I like his stuff, Naked was my first exposure to his writing, which is much like his NPR work.
(It's not just "much like" his NPR stuff -- I've heard several of the pieces from "Naked" and "Me Talk Pretty One Day" broadcast verbatim on "This American Life.")
What is this item doing in Poetry? It isn't about poetry.
Poetry quotes are sometimes posted here.
Or quotes about poetry: Sometimes a man survives a considerable time from an era in which he had his place into one which is strange to him, and then the curious are offered one of the most singular spectacles in the human comedy. Who now, for example, thinks of George Crabbe? He was a famous poet in his day, and the world recognised his genius with a unanimity which the greater complexity of modern life has rendered infrequent. He had learnt his craft at the school of Alexander Pope, and he wrote moral stories in rhymed couplets. Then came the French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars, and the poets sang new songs. Mr. Crabbe continued to write moral stories in rhymed couplets. I think he must have read the verse of these young men who were making so great a stir in the world, and I fancy he found it poor stuff. Of course, much of it was. But the odes of Keats and of Wordsworth, a poem or two by Coleridge, a few more by Shelley, discovered vast realms of the spirit that none had explored before. Mr. Crabbe was as dead as mutton, but Mr. Crabbe continued to write moral stories in rhymed couplets. I have read desultorily the writings of the younger generation. It may be that among them a more fervid Keats, a more ethereal Shelley, has already published numbers the world will willingly remember. I cannot tell. I admire their polish -- their youth is already so accomplished that it seems absurd to speak of promise -- I marvel at the felicity of their style; but with all their copiousness (their vocabulary suggests that they fingered Roget's Thesaurus in their cradles) they say nothing to me: to my mind they know too much and feel too obviously; I cannot stomach the heartiness with which they slap me on the back or the emotion with which they hurl themselves on my bosom; their passion seems to me a little anaemic and their dreams a trifle dull. I do not like them. I am on the shelf. I will continue to write moral stories in rhymed couplets. But I should be thrice a fool if I did it for aught but my own entertainment.
Interesting quote. It is indeed possible to become a dinosaur in one's own time. Me, I try to counteract the tendency. Dunno about the author. Sounds British. Must be post-Romantic, but probably not by much. Late 19th/early 20th century? A poet who wrote old-fashioned poetry. Hmmm... Thomas Hardy?
wow, that was perhaps the quickest I was able to pounce down upon a solution using the internet... dead on, the first Yahoo search, the first quote I grabbed. But, having said that, I'm not going to say who I is, except to say that John's incorrect about the author but correct about the era. My off-the-cuff guess would have been someone like Huxley, who's also contemporary (but also wrong). This has been linked to the poetry conference apparently so I can be a pain in the ass in the item. =}
(yay!)
Yes, British, yes to era, no to Hardy. And brighn is correct also on the quickness of a search, if one wants to go that way. But that isn't exactly sporting, eh?
(Is he correct on the the ass-painfulness of his response? Let's get to the meat of the question here.)
oh, it's sporting enough to look it up in a search, it's just not sporting to post the answer or to even drop any hints... except to say this: I even have a copy of at least one of this author's books. Now all someone has to do is rifle through my library, and they'll have it in no time. ;} you tell us, ori
(Paul wox!)
you're just saying that so I'll let you peek at my library...
A bunch of Bs come to mind: Beerbohm, Betjeman, Bridges? Who were the UK dinosaurs? Yeats? Kipling? Masefield? Chesterton? Housman?
The UK Dinosaurs... isn't that what the Doors changed their name to after Morrisson died?
Hmm... Chesterton sounds like a good bet. Of course, if that's correct, Michael gets to go since he dropped the name first. Could be Kipling too. As for doing internet searches: Might not be sporting, but when I give quotes, I assume nowadays that people are going to do it if they can. So I tend toward giving recent non-public-domain quotes that are unlikely to be found on the internet.
Well, sporting or not, it takes the fun outta the game (for the guesser). Like giving in and peeking at the answer to a Jumble--you immediately wish you hadn't, 'cuz you could've gotten it with a little more effort... Anyway, no on all guesses, and another quote: I lived near Victoria Station, and I recall long excursions by bus to the hospitable houses of the literary. In my timidity I wandered up and down the street while I screwed up my courage to ring the bell; and then, sick with apprehension, was ushered into an airless room full of people. I was introduced to this celebrated person after that one, and the kind words they said about my book made me excessively uncomfortable. I felt they expected me to say clever things, and I never could think of any till after the party was over. I tried to conceal my embarrassment by handing round cups of tea and rather ill-cut bread-and-butter. I wanted no one to take notice of me, so that I could observe these famous creatures at my ease and listen to the clever things they said. I have a recollection of large, unbending women with great noses and rapacious eyes, who wore their clothes as though they were armour; and of little, mouse-like spinsters, with soft voices and a shrewd glance. I never ceased to be fascinated by their persistence in eating buttered toast with their gloves on, and I observed with admiration the unconcern with which they wiped their fingers on their chair when they thought no one was looking. It must have been bad for the furniture, but I suppose the hostess took her revenge on the furniture of her friends when, in turn, she visited them. Some of them were dressed fashionably, and they said they couldn't for the life of them see why you should be dowdy just because you had written a novel; if you had a neat figure you might as well make the most of it, and a smart shoe on a small foot had never prevented an editor from taking your "stuff." But others thought this frivolous, and they wore "art fabrics" and barbaric jewelry. The men were seldom eccentric in appearance. They tried to look as little like authors as possible. They wished to be taken for men of the world, and could have passed anywhere for the managing clerks of a city firm. They always seemed a little tired. I had never known writers before, and I found them very strange, but I do not think they ever seemed to me quite real.
| Last 40 Responses and Response Form. |
|
|
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss