|
|
Use this item to discuss whatever you might be reading. Tell us what you liked and didn't like!
297 responses total.
Picked up a copy of "Paper Lion" the other day. This is the story of George Plimpton time as a rookie at the 1964(?) Detroit Lions training camp. Lots of fun, though I' m sure the language would be a lot bluer than it was here.
I'm reading "The Wallet of Kau Ling". Anyone else ever try that?
I'm still working on NAME OF THE ROSE, which is good if you don't mind being made to feel like an intellectual midget. "Hi, I'm Umberto Eco and I know +everything+. Here, let me show you."
Still reading "V." by Thomas Pynchon.. I keep hitting a brick wall. This happened to me once before, earlier in the book, and it took me a while to get around it. Once I got past, though, it was smooth sailing for about 100 pages.. If that's the case here, I should make it clear to the finish this time. Also, I've borrowed my roommate's "Complete Works of Oscar Wilde" so I can read some of his stuff that I hadn't read before.
Just finished "Pillar's of the Earth" by Ken Follet. I thought it was excellent.
Started _Many Sleepless Nights_, a book about organ transplants, their effect on people, and how society views the whole subject. I think it will be a very intersting book.
Just finished _The Difference Engine_ by Willam Gibson and Bruce Sterling, it wasn't worth it, although I did love the idea and what they did at the end of the book. Gibson, get back to _Neuromancer_ quality! Just started _Wildcards_ good, but looks comic-bookish and suffers from the 1001 sequels syndrome.
NAME OF THE ROSE was excellent (MUCH better than the movie), though I preferred FOUCAULT'S PENDULUM.
I just finished _Tehanu_. I hadn't realized Le Guin had written another Earthsea book. Read the first three when I was seven or eight (and again later). I dug those out and read them again earlier this week. The last resembles the earlier only somewhat. A decent book, if a bit hung up in theme and message rather than story. Now I'm going to read _The Cuckoo's Egg_ by Cliff Stohl. Should be interesting :)
re #9: The Cuckoo's Egg is much better than I had feared before reading it (and is, in fact, pretty good) but it has really attracted more attention than is good for it..
I've decided to try "Ulysses" by James Joyce. I figure after getting through "Atlas Shrugged", this should be a piece of cake!
<keats makes that funny boat-engine noise through the lips denoting extreme amusement> er, i think you're in for a surprise, hawkeye. let me give you a hint. joyce once commented that he spent ten years writing _ulysses_, so he thought the reader could spend at least that much time reading it. he wasn't kidding.
Maybe he should warm up with "Gravity's Rainbow". So, does anyone here actually claim to have read "Finnegan's Wake"? I hope not..
i haven't bothered yet, but i've been through joyce's other stuff. i'm sure i'll get to it in the next year or two...i specialize in other areas, so i can't really make it a priority. i'm told it's more obscure than _ulysses_, but otherwise, much like it. except perhaps among hardcore joyceans, i think the consensus with the literati is that _ulysses_ is better. (obscurity is a plus when you're a specialist...)
(have you even looked at Finnegan's Wake? I've read parts of Ulysses and while I won't claim that I understand it fully at least it's readable. In Finnegan's Wake most of the sentences don't make any sense (at least not in English. If you have a massive Joycean -> English concordance, perhaps they're decipherable.) It's always been my understanding that Ulysses is supposed to be better, too. I haven't even read all of Dubliners, though.)
The last major thing I finished reading was also *The Name of the Rose.* Whew! I have to admit that I did skip several pages at a time when it got down to discussions of philosophy. But very good. Yes, better than the movie, though now I think I'm going to rent the movie again to compare it more closely with the book. I wonder how much of it was Adso of Melk's writing and how much was Eco's. Right now I'm at my in-between-books stage where I read anthologies or re- read other things until another big project catches my eye.
STeve, let me know how _Many Sleepless Nights_ comes out. It's an interesting subject to me since I've known several people who have had kidney transplants and a couple of people who have had pancreas transplants. It is also interesting how differnet segments of society view transplants. My husband used to lecture to high schoolers about signing up to donate organs after death and there are some people (adults too) who believe that if you have it on the back of your license that you'll donate organs, that the E.M.T.s will not try as hard to revive you or save you from death. Movies like Body Parts don't help matters either. There are people who will believe that plot.
(thats incredible. Yes, I'll let you know how it comes out).
A couple nights ago, for a quick-and-dirty read, I sat down and read "The Killer Inside Me" by Jim Thompson. It was pretty pulpy, but entertaining. I can see why he has a small cult following.
(Um, all of it was Eco's writing, I believe.) _Tehanu_ was terrible. LeGuin has gone from the original Tao philosophy that powered the other Earthsea books to pseudofeminist maternalism. (You know--the sexes should be equal, even though men are evil and warlike, while women are soft and nurturing....)
Re: Finnegan's Wake. Two hints: 1) If you open the book at the front you're looking at the middle of the novel, and 2) It makes sense if heard, but not read.
Hey mike! I keep getting stuck on Gravity's Rainbow. Which is odd because I really DO like the writing in it. Hmm. I am reading "The Dharma Bums" by Jack Kerouac. I have been enjoying reading other things besides his "On the Road", though I will admit that his writing style is pretty consistent so far. It is a nice depiction of a period of time and a mindset though. I also finished not too long ago "The Quiet Pools" by Mike Kube-McDowell . He is a friend of mine who happens to be up for a HUGO award for best novel this year for that book. And the nice thing is I really enjoyed it a lot. I reccomend it. Good read and raises some interesting questions. I want to get some more Milan Kundera or Josef Sckvorecky (?) to read
Let's see, whenever I'm not wasting away my life on line, I've been reading TOO HOT TO HANDLE, Frank Close's account of the Cold Fusion story, and THE FAR AWAY MAN, aYellowthread Street mystery by William Marshall. The Close book is entertaining but badly edited; there is a lot of repetition! The most interesting tidbit in the book is an account of the *last* time someone discovered cold fusion, back in the 1920s... at the time it was sought as a source for cheap helium for airships, and Ernest Rutherford was a leader among the debunkers. I have loved all the previous books in the Marshall series (this is about #8), but this one is somewhat weak. Marshall's formula disperses his detectives among three problems, one of which is very grim and the other two are pretty funny. The funny ones wrap up about 2/3rds of the way through the book, freeing up those detectives to provide added firepower in what usually becomes a very violent climax. (I don't suppose anyone here would have read Marshall's new book, THE NEW YORK DETECTIVE, set in 1880?)
I recently read _Xenocide_, which is the third book in Orson Scott Card's series that began with _Ender's Game_. It's not as good as the other two, I think, but it was a good read, anyway. That man can WRITE! Griz
Re 24. I'm looking forward to that one. I very much like Ender's Game and Speaker for the Dead.
re 25. If you're nice to me, I'll let you borrow mine...
Is it out in paper back?
Just came out a few weeks ago in hardcover...be a year or so, I'm sure.
Yes, I spent the *gasp* $21.95 to get it in hardcover, read it, and then gave it to my sister as her bridesmaid's gift. I told her I had already read it and she said she would have worried about me if I hadn't. :) Griz
One of my favorite sf authors is Octavia Butler. If you haven't read any of her books do yourself a favor! I love everything I;ve read of hers so far but I reccomend starting with her Xenogenisis series. Dawn, Imago, and... forget the other.
Up to about page 60 in Ulysses. Only another 600 to go... I'm hoping the dirty parts start soon... I have only been defeated once by a book. I tried to read "The Bible" once waaaay back in grade school. Couldn't do it. Since then I've always finished everything I've started - no matter how bad. My only concern is if I'm actually going to read it all without reading something else in the middle of it.
I'm still reading Midnight, by Dean Koontz. I also have another Koontz book waiting by. Whispers.
I've been working on the Martha Grimes mystery "The Old Silent" for a while now. I seem to go for weeks not picking it up, and then I read 50 pages or so, and then start wasting time with magazines again. I don't know why, since I've read at least five other Grimes mysteries each in fairly short order.
Cockoo's Egg was okay. Kinda went in tired circle for the last half, though.
If you like Octavia Butler, pick up _Wild Seed_. Not part of a series, but a fairly good book.
This response has been erased.
A friend of Janice's loaned us a book-on-tape of "Seeing Voices," read by the author, Oliver Sacks. Sacks did not look or sound ANYTHING like I expected. (His appearance, I mean, based on accompanying photo.) Anyway, the book is wonderful, and I recommend it. Everything that Sacks has written is extremely fascinating. He's a neurologist who writes about people with various deficits: in "The Man Who Mistook His Wife For A Hat," he described people with various kinds of neurological disorders and what they tell us about us. "Seeing Voices" is about the deaf, and though it consists of a combination of history and neurology, is extremely moving.
I just turned my wife on to Orson Scott Card with "The Folk of the Fringe". Anyone else read that?
Yep. Good book. Griz
| Last 40 Responses and Response Form. |
|
|
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss