No Next Item No Next Conference Can't Favor Can't Forget Item List Conference Home Entrance    Help
Previous 27 Responses. View Responses


Grex Agora56 Item 158: South Dakota challenges Roe v Wade
Entered by richard on Tue Mar 7 16:43:30 UTC 2006:

1 new of 254 responses total.



#27 of 254 by marcvh on Tue Mar 7 18:22:35 2006:

Thank god, another abortion item!  We haven't had enough of them.  Any,
I've already posted my reasoning for why I think that, if you're going
to be pro-life, you can't permit abortion in the case of rape or incest
unless your real motive is anti-slut.

Re #11: Sounds like you disagree with the fact that this law does allow
the state to commit "infanticide" (which is really embrocide or
fetuscide) in some cases, such as when the mother's life is in danger.
The state also permits infanticide in other cases (for actual infants),
such as separating conjoined twins even if that condemns one of them to
death.  Not sure how you (or other pro-lifers) feel about that.


Next 40 Responses.
Last 40 Responses and Response Form.
No Next Item No Next Conference Can't Favor Can't Forget Item List Conference Home Entrance    Help

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss