No Next Item No Next Conference Can't Favor Can't Forget Item List Conference Home Entrance    Help
View Responses


Grex Aaypsi Item 12: 1,4-Dioxane at the Landfill
Entered by chelsea on Sun Jul 11 13:37:53 UTC 1993:

Ever so slowly information is getting out about toxins leaching into
the ground water at the city dump.  It was about two weeks ago 
I first saw the contaminant 1,4-dioxane linked to this site.  Someone
wrote a scathing letter to the editor on how Ann Arbor's City Council
knew about the contamination and was essentially avoiding stopping
its spread.

The second article followed about a week later and reported that yes
there was indeed dioxane coming from the site but Council 
thought the contaminant levels were within acceptable limits.
Yet, the city forced Gelman Sciences to a far lower "acceptable"
1,4-dioxane limits when negotiating Gelman's cleanup plan.

Has anyone read or heard more about this?  It would be reassuring 
to hear that this is a well known problem and experts are working
on a fair and safe solution.  But I have my doubts.

24 responses total.



#1 of 24 by pegasus on Sun Jul 11 20:55:51 1993:

Mary,

We've been told at University townhouses that the top of the water table
has been contaminated, but that the tests down under that, like 15ft or 
something, were clean.  This was a year or more ago.


#2 of 24 by scg on Mon Jul 12 01:18:39 1993:

I first heard about this problem several months ago, in the form of Gelman
propeganda during their fight with the city over 1,4 dioxane.  At that time,
I think that they were spreading this through the Liberatarian Party, who
I think was also responsible for the information this time.  I'm not really
sure, though.  I haven't heard too much about this.


#3 of 24 by chelsea on Mon Jul 12 02:20:31 1993:

How close to the landfill is the nearest housing on well water?


#4 of 24 by pegasus on Tue Jul 13 00:14:15 1993:

Mary,

I believe that'd be our complex.. University Townhouses.  There is a 
house/day care facility right at the junction of Ellsworth and Platt,
but I have no info if they're serviced by city water or not.

I also have no idea of Forest Hills (I think that's the name of the complex
next to Univeristy Townhouses) uses well water or not.  Then, there is a 
house on the same side of Ellsworth as the dump, with the dump in its
backyard.  Again, I don't know about their water supplier.


#5 of 24 by scg on Tue Jul 13 04:01:50 1993:

Forest Hills?  What do they expect the water to be like when they name the
complex after a cemetary? ;)


#6 of 24 by tsty on Tue Jul 13 14:52:53 1993:

Sedentary, quiet, .............


#7 of 24 by popcorn on Tue Jul 13 21:40:05 1993:

This response has been erased.



#8 of 24 by rcurl on Wed Jul 14 05:47:10 1993:

Are those drains you use? Drain traps should prevent gases backing up
through drains, unless your vent pipe is plugged (bird nests,
meteorites, etc).


#9 of 24 by marc on Wed Jul 14 20:20:24 1993:

Geez! Just the other day I was plunging away on my drain and this huge 
rock-like thing popped out!  Until that moment in my life I wasn't
aware that such things could happen.  Thanks for the info, rane!



#10 of 24 by dana on Fri Jul 23 15:12:54 1993:

There is a report about the landfill that is available to the public.
Just appear at the City of Ann Arbor's City Engineer's office and
ask for one.  It's large and complex but it should tell you more
than many would want to know.  (It's always a risk to be well
informed.)

I have seen the report.  My impression was that it was large and
too technical for my background.  I passed it on to my friend of
mine to read.  I'll ask him if he's read it yet.


#11 of 24 by popcorn on Mon Aug 9 22:27:29 1993:

This response has been erased.



#12 of 24 by rcurl on Mon Aug 16 01:36:57 1993:

Rarely used drains evaporate their water seal, and pass gas 8-<. Put
in antifreeze, if the drain is not going to be used for a long time.


#13 of 24 by dana on Thu Aug 26 23:12:07 1993:

I thought anitfreeze evaporated faster than water.  Why put that in?


#14 of 24 by rcurl on Fri Aug 27 04:13:34 1993:

Antifreeze (glycol type) is less than 1% as volatile as water. I think
I saw a recommendation to use a 50% antifreeze / 50% water mixture, as
straight antifreeze softens plastic and rubber seals.


#15 of 24 by tsty on Wed Sep 8 18:09:16 1993:

Gasoline-line antifreeze evaporates faster than water (or gasoline
for that matter). Radiator antifreeze is an absolutely different
chemical and evaporates as rcurl stated above.
  
That the lable (antifreeze) is the same is technically unfortunate.


#16 of 24 by rcurl on Thu Sep 9 03:38:27 1993:

DO NOT USE GASOLINE LINE ANTIFREEZE. That is volatile and flammable.
Also, DO NOT PUT GLYCOL ANTIFREEZE IN YOUR GAS TANK. That is nonvolatile
and will ruin your engine. (I have never used gasoline-line antifreeze,
and consider it one of those "magical" gimmicks that don't do anything,
but get a loyal following. Sort of a "chemical dependency".)


#17 of 24 by aa8ij on Thu Sep 9 06:42:02 1993:

   Unless you are flying at an obscene altitiude, I would second that.

  Of course, Aviation gasoline already has some antifreeze, so does
Jet-A and Jet-B (JP-4). I would not recommend adding the aforementioned
`Jet fuels to your gas. They burn hot and you will, for a while run
great. When you shut your motor off, call a tow truck. you`ll need it.

  I used to use a 50/50 mix of Shell 100LL and Mobil Super in my tank
and it did wonders for my engine. ;)
shell 100LL is avgas; blue in color.


#18 of 24 by rcurl on Thu Sep 9 22:19:54 1993:

Shell 100LL and Mobil Super precipitate into a solid brick when they
are mixed, don't they?


#19 of 24 by aa8ij on Fri Sep 10 03:11:08 1993:

 no, not really, It just brings the octane level from high to obscene.

   I for one, while in Aviation school, had a lot of crazy ideas for running
engines and I did a lot of experimentation with avgas and car gas.

  Muncle once owned a Mobil station. and the airport was just down
the street.


#20 of 24 by dana on Mon Sep 27 02:00:35 1993:

Re#10:  The Ann Arbor landfill was planned in 3 phases.  Phase 1
        was dug as a sand pit in the 1940's.  The area's garbage
        went in.  This was before liners and before any sepera-
        tion of garbage.  Essentially what was originally 
        dumped into the landfill is not entirely known and 
        what the rain causes the leachate to become is not
        known.  Dioxin is only one of the dangerous chemicals
        present.

        The rain has caused leachate from the landfill run
        into the groundwater in the area, esp. under University
        Townhouses.  Since ALL the ground water deposits in the
        Ann Arbor area are connected, the water for the whole
        area is threatened.  It is not known if the contamin-
        ated will eventually bubble up and contaminate the
        soil.


#21 of 24 by tsty on Tue Oct 26 09:12:31 1993:

Gasoline-antifreeze is basically methanol, an alcohol which mixes 
well with petroleum products +as well as+ water. It's very much
cheaper to buy methanol as methanol and add about 8 ounces every
couple of tank-fulls. 
  
For that matter, so does isopropal, which is easier to obtain and
works well also. Use the 90+% stuff, it's not as diluted to
begin with.


#22 of 24 by rcurl on Tue Oct 26 13:25:27 1993:

Gasoline, of course, cannot freeze (even in Michigan). Methanol or
iso-propanol acts to prevent any water present from freezing. Methanol
used to be considered hard on carburetor (and other) seals. I haven't
heard of iso-propanol being used for this but - don't use the "drugstore"
70% stuff - get *99%* (if you can). 


#23 of 24 by honeyc on Sun Oct 31 16:33:41 1993:

Be careful not to confuse dioxin with 1,4 dioxane.  Dioxin is the one that m
most people have heard about and that much research has been done.  1,4 dioxane
is less studied and its effects are less known... but some researchers are
suggesting that it may prove to be more deadly than dioxin.

Before using any anti-freeze, you may want to check how much 1,4 dioxane it
contains.

Also be careful to know the differences between the Ann Arbor Landfill 1,4 
dioxane problem and the Gelman Sciences Inc. 1,4 dioxane problem.  While
both are causing 1,4 dioxane to be released into aquifers, the root cause
of the spills and the available remedial actions available are quite 
different.

Be alert for mis-information relating to these subjects.  There are those
whose interests are served by confusing and delaying the public's 
understanding of these issues.


#24 of 24 by rcurl on Sun Oct 31 19:58:05 1993:

I do not think any researchers are suggesting that 1,4 dioxane is more
deadly than dioxin. Please cite sources from the medical literature. In
this connection, honeyc's last admonition applies.

Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.

No Next Item No Next Conference Can't Favor Can't Forget Item List Conference Home Entrance    Help

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss