|
|
Ever so slowly information is getting out about toxins leaching into the ground water at the city dump. It was about two weeks ago I first saw the contaminant 1,4-dioxane linked to this site. Someone wrote a scathing letter to the editor on how Ann Arbor's City Council knew about the contamination and was essentially avoiding stopping its spread. The second article followed about a week later and reported that yes there was indeed dioxane coming from the site but Council thought the contaminant levels were within acceptable limits. Yet, the city forced Gelman Sciences to a far lower "acceptable" 1,4-dioxane limits when negotiating Gelman's cleanup plan. Has anyone read or heard more about this? It would be reassuring to hear that this is a well known problem and experts are working on a fair and safe solution. But I have my doubts.
24 responses total.
Mary, We've been told at University townhouses that the top of the water table has been contaminated, but that the tests down under that, like 15ft or something, were clean. This was a year or more ago.
I first heard about this problem several months ago, in the form of Gelman propeganda during their fight with the city over 1,4 dioxane. At that time, I think that they were spreading this through the Liberatarian Party, who I think was also responsible for the information this time. I'm not really sure, though. I haven't heard too much about this.
How close to the landfill is the nearest housing on well water?
Mary, I believe that'd be our complex.. University Townhouses. There is a house/day care facility right at the junction of Ellsworth and Platt, but I have no info if they're serviced by city water or not. I also have no idea of Forest Hills (I think that's the name of the complex next to Univeristy Townhouses) uses well water or not. Then, there is a house on the same side of Ellsworth as the dump, with the dump in its backyard. Again, I don't know about their water supplier.
Forest Hills? What do they expect the water to be like when they name the complex after a cemetary? ;)
Sedentary, quiet, .............
This response has been erased.
Are those drains you use? Drain traps should prevent gases backing up through drains, unless your vent pipe is plugged (bird nests, meteorites, etc).
Geez! Just the other day I was plunging away on my drain and this huge rock-like thing popped out! Until that moment in my life I wasn't aware that such things could happen. Thanks for the info, rane!
There is a report about the landfill that is available to the public. Just appear at the City of Ann Arbor's City Engineer's office and ask for one. It's large and complex but it should tell you more than many would want to know. (It's always a risk to be well informed.) I have seen the report. My impression was that it was large and too technical for my background. I passed it on to my friend of mine to read. I'll ask him if he's read it yet.
This response has been erased.
Rarely used drains evaporate their water seal, and pass gas 8-<. Put in antifreeze, if the drain is not going to be used for a long time.
I thought anitfreeze evaporated faster than water. Why put that in?
Antifreeze (glycol type) is less than 1% as volatile as water. I think I saw a recommendation to use a 50% antifreeze / 50% water mixture, as straight antifreeze softens plastic and rubber seals.
Gasoline-line antifreeze evaporates faster than water (or gasoline for that matter). Radiator antifreeze is an absolutely different chemical and evaporates as rcurl stated above. That the lable (antifreeze) is the same is technically unfortunate.
DO NOT USE GASOLINE LINE ANTIFREEZE. That is volatile and flammable. Also, DO NOT PUT GLYCOL ANTIFREEZE IN YOUR GAS TANK. That is nonvolatile and will ruin your engine. (I have never used gasoline-line antifreeze, and consider it one of those "magical" gimmicks that don't do anything, but get a loyal following. Sort of a "chemical dependency".)
Unless you are flying at an obscene altitiude, I would second that. Of course, Aviation gasoline already has some antifreeze, so does Jet-A and Jet-B (JP-4). I would not recommend adding the aforementioned `Jet fuels to your gas. They burn hot and you will, for a while run great. When you shut your motor off, call a tow truck. you`ll need it. I used to use a 50/50 mix of Shell 100LL and Mobil Super in my tank and it did wonders for my engine. ;) shell 100LL is avgas; blue in color.
Shell 100LL and Mobil Super precipitate into a solid brick when they are mixed, don't they?
no, not really, It just brings the octane level from high to obscene. I for one, while in Aviation school, had a lot of crazy ideas for running engines and I did a lot of experimentation with avgas and car gas. Muncle once owned a Mobil station. and the airport was just down the street.
Re#10: The Ann Arbor landfill was planned in 3 phases. Phase 1
was dug as a sand pit in the 1940's. The area's garbage
went in. This was before liners and before any sepera-
tion of garbage. Essentially what was originally
dumped into the landfill is not entirely known and
what the rain causes the leachate to become is not
known. Dioxin is only one of the dangerous chemicals
present.
The rain has caused leachate from the landfill run
into the groundwater in the area, esp. under University
Townhouses. Since ALL the ground water deposits in the
Ann Arbor area are connected, the water for the whole
area is threatened. It is not known if the contamin-
ated will eventually bubble up and contaminate the
soil.
Gasoline-antifreeze is basically methanol, an alcohol which mixes well with petroleum products +as well as+ water. It's very much cheaper to buy methanol as methanol and add about 8 ounces every couple of tank-fulls. For that matter, so does isopropal, which is easier to obtain and works well also. Use the 90+% stuff, it's not as diluted to begin with.
Gasoline, of course, cannot freeze (even in Michigan). Methanol or iso-propanol acts to prevent any water present from freezing. Methanol used to be considered hard on carburetor (and other) seals. I haven't heard of iso-propanol being used for this but - don't use the "drugstore" 70% stuff - get *99%* (if you can).
Be careful not to confuse dioxin with 1,4 dioxane. Dioxin is the one that m most people have heard about and that much research has been done. 1,4 dioxane is less studied and its effects are less known... but some researchers are suggesting that it may prove to be more deadly than dioxin. Before using any anti-freeze, you may want to check how much 1,4 dioxane it contains. Also be careful to know the differences between the Ann Arbor Landfill 1,4 dioxane problem and the Gelman Sciences Inc. 1,4 dioxane problem. While both are causing 1,4 dioxane to be released into aquifers, the root cause of the spills and the available remedial actions available are quite different. Be alert for mis-information relating to these subjects. There are those whose interests are served by confusing and delaying the public's understanding of these issues.
I do not think any researchers are suggesting that 1,4 dioxane is more deadly than dioxin. Please cite sources from the medical literature. In this connection, honeyc's last admonition applies.
Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.
|
|
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss