You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-9   9-33   34-58   59-72       
 
Author Message
25 new of 72 responses total.
aruba
response 9 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jul 13 19:08 UTC 1998

I searched around on the IRS site and found reference to the publication Rane
mentioned.  It's number has chenged and it's not on the web site, but I called
up and ordered it, so in theory I should get it in the next 2 weeks.

I also found (on the IRS site) what looks like a plain-English version of the
rules on receipts, and I downloaded that but haven't yet digested it.  At
a glance, it appears that waiting till the end of the year may be OK for a
"substantiation" receipt, which is the thing you use to claim a deduction on
your taxes.  However there is also the concept of a "disclosure notice", which
is something you send donors to tell them how much the thing they got in
return for their donation is worth, ala Rane's magazine example above.  The
disclosure notice must be sent out in a "timely" manner, which I think means
we couldn't wait until the end of the year.

I don't think we need to send out any disclosure notices, however, since we
don't normally send out stuff in response to donations (other than a copy of
the Grex handbook, which is small enough not to count).  This is the part I
want to make sure of, though, so I need to read the regs carefully.

I'm thinking that the Accounting Aid Society, which we used to belong to,
might be worth turning to for help.  Perhaps they could give us some
definitive answers.  We might have to rejoin them, which would cost $25 per 
year.  danr, do you have any thoughts on that suggestion?
danr
response 10 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jul 13 19:24 UTC 1998

Regarding membership donations, I'd say that paper receipts are only
necessary when a donor requests it.  As others have pointed out, a 
receipt is only necessary when a donation is greater than $250, and
since this is the first request, I doubt that you'll get a whole lot 
more. 

When you send out the receipt is up to the treasurer, I guess, but I'd
be mostly likely to send them out when I received the donation. That 
way, I'd have less paperwork to do at tax time, when I may or may not 
have the right information available. Asking the donor to supply an 
SASE, as marcus suggested, is also a good idea, especially if the donor 
is paying on a monthly basis.

Re: the auctions.  If what Rane is saying is true--and I have no
reason to doubt him--the disclosure notice isn't necessary.  The donor
is the one to put a value on the item donated, and only the donor gets
the tax deduction.  This makes sense, actually. If both the donor and
the purchaser were able to deduct, that would be a double deduction.

I've received disclosure notices when I donated to WEMU in order to
get one of their t-shirts.  In this case, however, the shirts were
purchased by WEMU and not donated to them.
rcurl
response 11 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jul 14 05:41 UTC 1998

We would need to *acknowledged* donations of goods, so that the donor has
a record that that Item had been donated. A 'form' acknowledgement with
a space for the identification of the item(s) would be fine, and it also
permits repeating the IRS rules briefly on valuing the donation (that Grex
can't and the donor is responsible for doing so).
aruba
response 12 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jul 14 17:14 UTC 1998

BTW Rane, is that rule about the donor valuing the goods in that same
publication you mentioned earlier (the one about disclosure and
substantiation), or should I order another one too?
rcurl
response 13 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jul 14 20:30 UTC 1998

Yes, no. The form states "Valuation of the donated property is the
responsibility of the donor."
aruba
response 14 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jul 14 21:45 UTC 1998

OK, thanks.
srw
response 15 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jul 21 05:07 UTC 1998

back in resp:8 , Rane said that only the donor can claim the
(donor-determined) value of a donation to the Auction. That is true, but might
be misleading. If a bidder bids more than the fair market value of the item,
the excess can be considered a donation by the bidder. I believe we can provide
a fair market value in that case, but I don't think we are obligated to provide
a disclosure notice for auction items.
rcurl
response 16 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jul 21 05:24 UTC 1998

The "excess" over the donor determined value can be considered a deductible
donation by the donor. However *Grex* may not specify the "fair market
value" or any other value of the donated item. We are excluded from doing
that. (The temptation for connivance would be too great....non-profits
would lean toward estimating 'fair market value' on the high side to make
donors happier and thereby encourage more donations.)
janc
response 17 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jul 22 12:26 UTC 1998

I'm trying to figure out if membership donations are fully deductable. 
People do receive something for their memberships - ability to initiate
telnet, ftp and irc sessions from their Grex accounts.  It is hard to
estimate the fair market value of that increment in service that members
get beyond what other users get.  Nobody sells it separately.  The
definition of "fair market value" is "what a willing buyer would pay a
willing seller."  I can't even begin to guess.

There is good chance that this can be treated as a membership package
benefit.  In the IRS publication "Updates on Disclosure and
Substantiation Rules" it talks about "safe harbors" for kinds of
benefits that can be treated as being of zero value:

    The fourth safe harbor involves membership package benefits.
  Charities, such as museums, libraries, zoos, and arboretums,
  typically use membership packages to build a following and base of
  support. The benefits of a typical membership package may include
  free parking, gift shop discounts, an admission discount, etc.
  Charitable organizations which offer basic membership packages at $75
  or less and include some or all of the following benefits can treat
  such membership benefits as having insubstantial value and, hence,
  need not value them. See Proposed Regs. 1.170A-13(f)(8)(i)(B) and
  1.6115-1(b). The membership benefits are:

   a) Any right or privilege, other than rights to seating at collegiate
      athletic events, the contributor can exercise frequently during
      the membership period. Examples of such rights and privileges
      include free or discounted admission to organizations' facilities
      or events, free or discounted parking, preferred access to goods
      or services, and discounts on purchases of goods or services; and

   b) Admission to events during the membership period open only to
      members if the cost per person for the event, excluding any
      allocable overhead, is within the limits for low cost articles.
      For 1996, the limit for low cost articles is $6.70. See Rev. Proc.
      95-53, 1995-52 I.R.B. 22.

Case (a) looks like it should cover memberships.  This would mean that
membership fees are deductable from the donor's taxes.
janc
response 18 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jul 22 12:35 UTC 1998

A clarification on Rane's comment:

   Grex is not responsible for determining the fair market value of
   good and services donated to Grex.

   Grex is responsible for determining the fair market value of goods
   and services given by Grex to users.

This is confusing in the case of auction items.

I think T-shirt and mug purchases are not deductable at all.
janc
response 19 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jul 22 15:59 UTC 1998

Here's another description of the rules for deducting membership dues in
IRS Publication 526, "Charitable Contributions".  I think it's a bit
clearer:

        MEMBERSHIP FEES OR DUES.  You may be able
        to  deduct membership fees  or  dues you pay
        to a qualified organization. However, you can
        deduct only the amount that is more than the
        value of the benefits you receive.   [...]

        Certain  membership  benefits  can  be
        disregarded. Both you and the organization
        can  disregard  certain  membership  benefits
        you  get  in  return  for  an  annual  payment  of
        $75 or less to the qualified organization. You
        can pay more than $75 to the organization if
        the  organization  does  not  require  a  larger
        payment  for  you  to  get  the  benefits.  The
        benefits covered under this rule are:

        1) Any rights or privileges, other than those
           discussed under  Athletic events, earlier,
           that you can use frequently while you are
           a member, such as:

           a) Free or discounted admission to the
              organization's facilities or events,

           b) Free or discounted parking,

           c) Preferred access to goods or services,
              and

           d) Discounts on the purchase of goods
              and services, and 

        2) Admission, while you are a member, to
           events that are open only to members
           of the organization if the organization
           reasonably projects that the cost per
           person (excluding any allocated overhead)
           is not more than a specified amount, 
           which may be adjusted annually for inflation.
           (This is the amount for low-cost articles 
           given in the annual revenue procedure with
           inflation adjusted amounts for the current
           year. You can get this figure from the IRS.)

This clarifies that the $75 limit is on annual memberships.  Even people
who pay $6 a month pay only $72 a year, so we are under that limit. 
Though none of the (a), (b), (c) or (d) examples really fits our
membership benefits, they certainly are not athletic events and they
certainly can be exercised frequently while a member.

So, personally, I'm pretty convinced that Grex membership donations are
fully tax deductable, and would happily deduct them from my taxes, but
I'm not sure I'm ready to announce to the members, as a spokesman for
Grex, that all members can deduct their membership dues.  Would it be
possible to write to the IRS asking about this, and get a somewhat more
reliable opinion?  I'm not sure where you would address such a letter.
janc
response 20 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jul 22 16:12 UTC 1998

On auctions, my guess is that we need do nothing if the item sells for
$75 or less.  If it sells for more than $75, we probably have to come up
with a "fair market value" for the item and send a receipt to the buyer
stating that value and saying anything above that value should be
treated as a donation.  I'm far from sure about this though.
rcurl
response 21 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jul 23 02:02 UTC 1998

Sigh....that's what I've been trying to tell everyone for months...but I
am glad that Jan has so exhaustively quoted from the sources. 

Do NOT write to the IRS to ask about this. Just quote the relevant rules.
It is *always* up to the donor to fit them to their circumstances.

You do NOT have to come up with a "fair market value" for any donation,
of any item of any size. MKC was recently donated 2.5 acres of land,
worth thousands. It is up to the donor to value it for tax purposes. In
regard to a donation that is subsequently auctioned to raise money...the
donor is in exactly the same position of having to themsevles determine
the value. The buyer gets NO deductibility from their purchase, no matter
how much they pay. What the buyer pays is NEVER a donation. 
aruba
response 22 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jul 23 05:59 UTC 1998

Why do you think we shouldn't write to the IRS, Rane?
dpc
response 23 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jul 23 14:57 UTC 1998

A member also gets the right to vote and make motions.  I suppose it's
technically possible to say that all of the $72/year of a membership
could be squeezed into one of the exceptions.  However, we're then
saying that Grex membership is worthless!  On M-Net, we don't claim
that memberships or patronships are tax-deductible because we think
those folks get things of value.  Donations to our auctions are
tax-deductible, but of course our receipts for those don't list the
value.  However, *purchases* of things from the auction are *not*
tax-deductible because the purchaser gets the value of the goods
s/he has bought.
rcurl
response 24 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jul 23 18:16 UTC 1998

You should not write the IRS because they will not take the time to look
into the specifics of your situation, and usually just quote the book (and
then the part of the book that maximizes their return). If this were a
serious matter, a competent tax attorney is a better bet (they rely on
return business - not something the IRS worries about). But the instructions
are so clear in this case that one can hardly go wrong following them.
aruba
response 25 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jul 24 04:04 UTC 1998

Well, I think it *is* a serious matter, and worth getting an official ruling
on.  I agree it may be difficult to get someone to give a straight answer,
though.
scg
response 26 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jul 24 05:08 UTC 1998

I think Rane's point is that the response from the IRS is not an official
ruling.  That's probably something an accountant with a good understanding
of 501(c)3 tax law would be better qualified to answer.
rcurl
response 27 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jul 24 06:16 UTC 1998

The answer is so well known, and so well described in the forms and booklets,
that no further research is necessary. Steve is right in the sense that
you will *not* get a tax attorney at IRS to answer your question - you will
get one of a phalanx of ill trained flunkies paid to answer questions from
the public. Sometimes they are right, of course. The only useful interaction
with the IRS is satisfying their rigamarole, which Jan did admirably. There
is now no more help at the IRS.
davel
response 28 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jul 24 11:24 UTC 1998

Hmph.  Rane's convinced me on this one.

Re 23: The value of a Grex membership, over and above what any user gets, is
indeed pretty minimal.  The fair market value of the right to vote and make
motions in the governance of Grex is, IMO, zero.  The internet access is not
absolutely worthless, but given that most users, including almost all
non-local ones, have better access which they use to get to Grex in the first
place, it's hard to see that as a high-value item.  Remember that web access,
such as it is with lynx, is available to all users, as is email.  How
many ISPs even sell accounts with *just* telnet & ftp access to the web?

We've always stated up front that the main benefit of Grex membership is
knowing that you're helping to keep this system available to all.
The claim that we're seriously in the business of selling internet access,
or Wizard In Training manuals, is pretty laughable.
remmers
response 29 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jul 24 12:09 UTC 1998

If it's the case that outbound telnet and ftp access is of low
value now, perhaps it's time to consider modifying our policy to
make these available to all validated users, not just members only,
like we did for usenet news posting. The usenet posting policy is
moot because we don't carry usenet news any longer, but doesn't
the same principle apply?

(Serious discussion of this point belongs in a separate item, I
suppose.)
janc
response 30 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jul 24 16:28 UTC 1998

Rane:

  - I agree that we do not assign "fair market prices" objects donated.
    That is up to the donor.  We are responsible only for determining
    the fair market value of things we sell.

  - I disagree that auction purchases are never deductable.  Last year
    Mark paid $60 for the "Grex Bat," a completely imaginary item.  I'd
    say that was 100% deductable.  We regularly have essentially
    worthless trinkets being bid fairly high for the shear fun of it.
    I'd expect "Pandora's Mystic Box" to go for about 50 cents in a
    garage sale.  Bids are much higher than that and are probably
    mostly deductable.  There is currently an apple pie going for $25.
    It's a great pie and I may bid it up some more, but that's probably
    double what any reasonable accountant would call the fair market
    value.

    While it is true that many auction items go for prices at or below
    their fair market values, it is also true that people quite often
    pay more for things than they usually would because they want
    to support Grex.  I don't think a "no auction items are deductable"
    rule works across the board.

Dave Cahill:
    The right to vote and make motions has no value as far as the IRS
    is concerned.  They are only interested in the "services" that
    members get.  Luckily the IRS's idea of worth is not like anyone
    else's.  For example, your donations to your church may help save
    your soul, but the IRS thinks your soul is worthless, so it is OK
    to deduct the full value of those donations.  In normal human
    parlance, "fully tax deductable" is not equivalent to "worthless."

    My (very unexpert) guess is that Arbornet's patronships are not
    fully deductable.  Their price is above the $75 cut-off and they
    have more benefits.  It's probable that they could be partly
    deductable, because I think the fair market value is lower than
    the price.

Dave Lovelace:
    My understanding of "fair market value" is that it is not "what the
    average person would pay" but "what some person would pay."  I
    think there are actually people who buy Grex memberships for no
    other reason than to get the services.  My guess is that there is
    a small, but real population of people who would pay several dollars
    a month for those benefits.  This is why I'm reluctant to try to
    defend the full deductability of Grex memberships on the basis of
    the "de minimus" exception (which is used for bookmarks, bumper
    stickers and address labels that charities send you).  I think
    the "frequently exercisable" case works better.

At the last meeting, the board approved renewing our membership in the
Accounting Aide Society.  We may be able to get some more expert advice
on this from them.
aruba
response 31 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jul 24 17:42 UTC 1998

My understanding is that this is exactly the kind of questions they answer
at the AAS.
rcurl
response 32 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jul 24 20:06 UTC 1998

Re #30: in every case, if Grex can say that nothing of value was provided
in exchange for the donation, the donation is deductible. No one would
consider the auctioning of a "grex bat" however as providing something
of value in exchange for the donation.

Markets work by competitive bidding. If someone wants something badly
enough, they will pay a high price for it. There is no *inherent* value
in an item except what someone will pay for it. Who can say that someone
paid more for an item in an auction than that item cost is paying it
because they want it, or because they want to make a donation? Which
assumption do you think the IRS will adopt?

A possible interpretation is that trinkets or items of small cost value
are being given as a gift to the person making the largest donation for
it. (Call it an auction if you wish...but not to the IRS?). There is
a term for that kind of 'value'. So, I will concede that there is probably
some way to proceed to acknowledge some of the amount paid in an auction
to be deductible, but I'd like to see the rules documented and tested. 
janc
response 33 of 72: Mark Unseen   Jul 28 13:02 UTC 1998

Well, I got Pub 1391 from the IRS, and it clarifies some things, but
unfortunately not anything that we actually needed clarification on.  It
contains lots of examples of different fundraising events, but none that
come very close to the auction.  The nearest is "Example 9", in which
people donate objects sold in a bazaar.  The objects are sold for a
price set by the charity to be near their fair-market value.  The
purchasers can't deduct the items, but the donors can.  That differs
from the auction in that we don't set prices in the auction and some few
items do go for far beyond their fair market prices.

My guess is that we should say "book value for this item is $20" when we
put objects up for description, but doing that would likely tend to stop
the bidding at $20.  Not only would it tend to dampen the bidding, but
I'd find it very hard to come up with sane values for many of these
items.

I'm beginning to think that the "auction purchases are generally not tax
deductable" stance might be the best.  Most of the time it is true.  It
seems to me pretty rare for items to go for much more than their fair
market value.  Exceptions are items like the Grex Bat and cruises on
imaginary yachts which plainly have no real value since they don't
exist.
 0-9   9-33   34-58   59-72       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss