response 9 of 14:

Nov 29 16:55 UTC 2006

It is the November meeting that ended at 9:20 and Slynne apparently posted
both Oct and Nov right after that.

response 11 of 14:

Nov 30 04:18 UTC 2006

(Or, if not me, then anybody....)

response 13 of 14:

Jan 1 21:09 UTC 2007

I'm thinking it would be good to open up the restriction a little, perhaps
anyone using root for any purpose should provide good documentation on
changes being done, have some core members approve changes quickely by
concensus. Let the board decide a specific ceiling to the gravity of changes
made. ie.
allow control of root to 3 people
board decides root for maintenance only, and allowing trusted access to solve
spam, denial of service issue(s).
a trusted admin proposes solution to issue (ie. spam). admin posts complete
documentation of solution.
the same 3 people discuss issue, wait for comments, if solution is not going
to break something, and no negative comments, root is given. solution is
applied.
Just a thought.
Is anyone thinking anything like that? What I'm thinking would obviously have
to be discussed and changed dramatically.