|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 293 responses total. |
polytarp
|
|
response 87 of 293:
| 
Jul 16 06:07 UTC 2002 |
You people whine a lot.
|
oval
|
|
response 88 of 293:
|
Jul 16 09:57 UTC 2002 |
this is probably not the appropriate place to post this but i'm having
trouble using bbs with this putty client. i get the Ok prompt and
repond or pass prompt but no posts. i tried redoing everything
via 'change' but still nuttin. can anyone give me some advice?
|
keesan
|
|
response 89 of 293:
|
Jul 16 14:35 UTC 2002 |
Lynx is still not working - it finds the DNS number and says 'making
HTTP connection to 123.44.....'.
|
gull
|
|
response 90 of 293:
|
Jul 16 17:59 UTC 2002 |
Re #89: There's a note in the MOTD about the proxy server being down. That
means Lynx isn't going to work until it's fixed.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 91 of 293:
|
Jul 17 00:39 UTC 2002 |
oval, try
printenv TERM
or
echo $TERM
I'd guess it *won't* say vt100. You could then try
setenv TERM vt100
and see what happens.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 92 of 293:
|
Jul 17 01:13 UTC 2002 |
resp 87: Speak for yourself, Phillie boy.
|
oval
|
|
response 93 of 293:
|
Jul 17 14:14 UTC 2002 |
uhhhh... looks like exiting and logging back in after running change in
neccessary.
oops.
|
other
|
|
response 94 of 293:
|
Jul 18 17:43 UTC 2002 |
I have now begun to receive spam sent to comments@grex, board@grex, and
possibly other alias addresses. All in favor of spammers being subjected
to spontaneous combustion, say "Aye!" (You don't have to type it in,
though.)
|
tsty
|
|
response 95 of 293:
|
Jul 19 12:05 UTC 2002 |
you could always get the senate to add spammers to the new
'life behind bars' bill - see Nucking Futts item.
|
other
|
|
response 96 of 293:
|
Jul 19 16:47 UTC 2002 |
I could, if I had a few hundred million dollars to strategically give
away for the privilege of writing my own legislation...
|
carson
|
|
response 97 of 293:
|
Jul 19 20:36 UTC 2002 |
(ssh appears to leave birthday announcements out.)
|
krj
|
|
response 98 of 293:
|
Jul 19 22:27 UTC 2002 |
The idle timer seems to be failing. I got a whole bunch of messages
telling me I would be disconnected for idleness, but the disconnect
never happened.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 99 of 293:
|
Jul 20 01:47 UTC 2002 |
Hmmm... it's possible that the number of open connections dropped between the
warning and its execution, of course.
|
russ
|
|
response 100 of 293:
|
Jul 20 13:08 UTC 2002 |
Whatever the problem was with teh dial-ins, it's fixed.
|
tpryan
|
|
response 101 of 293:
|
Jul 20 21:02 UTC 2002 |
They are behaving better. Thank you. even to the point
of hanging up when I log in as bye to get disconnected. before
it was just handing me another log-in.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 102 of 293:
|
Jul 21 19:00 UTC 2002 |
I think pwho is broken:
pwohbash-2.05$ pwoh
wohpwohpowhpwhowphobash: pwoh: command not found
w
bash-2.05$ pwho
User Started Channel
bash-2.05$ pwoh
bash: pwoh: command not found
bash-2.05$ pwoh
bash: pwoh: command not found
bash-2.05$ wohpwohpowhpwhowphow
bash: wohpwohpowhpwhowphow: command not found
bash-2.05$ hppwohwph
bash: hppwohwph: command not found
bash-2.05$ pwohpwohp
owbash: pwohpwohp: command not found
h
pbash-2.05$ owh
hpbash: owh: command not found
bash-2.05$ pwohpwhpop
hbash: pwohpwhpop: command not found
bash-2.05$ h
bash: h: command not found
bash-2.05$
|
gelinas
|
|
response 103 of 293:
|
Jul 21 22:21 UTC 2002 |
It's also possible that no one was using party at the time.
According to the log, party seems to have been empty from 14:53 to 15:00
this afternoon.
|
other
|
|
response 104 of 293:
|
Jul 22 06:52 UTC 2002 |
I think polytarp is broken:
See resp:102
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 105 of 293:
|
Jul 22 12:57 UTC 2002 |
I'm sorry, but he's working exactly the way he's designed to.
|
jp2
|
|
response 106 of 293:
|
Jul 22 15:23 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
tpryan
|
|
response 107 of 293:
|
Jul 23 22:31 UTC 2002 |
What I said in item 3.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 108 of 293:
|
Jul 24 23:21 UTC 2002 |
Most of the users on the system are acting like complete untersmench. This
MUST be corrected. Of course, like all systems of class, I, the creator, am
in the highest. Feel free to ask me who is untersmench, and who it not.
|
tsty
|
|
response 109 of 293:
|
Jul 25 09:09 UTC 2002 |
so pwho returned a null set . untersmench probably returns
a null set as well.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 110 of 293:
|
Jul 26 05:10 UTC 2002 |
Hmm. I spelt that word wrong!
|
davel
|
|
response 111 of 293:
|
Jul 26 13:18 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
