You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   62-86   87-92      
 
Author Message
6 new of 92 responses total.
cross
response 87 of 92: Mark Unseen   Oct 15 00:41 UTC 2006

Joe's right, I do want to change that.  I'm pretty disappointed that
discussion about it has stopped in garage (and I would assume the staff
conference and mailing list, too).  But I also want to update grexsrc and
work on getting a local grexdoc that's mirrorable to remote systems via some
standard protocol (cvsup, cvsync, etc).  Ultimately, a merge of grexdoc and
grexsoft would be nice.  Getting an updated newuser running would be nice; I
found - and fixed - lots of bugs in my private version derived from the
sources running on grex.  Removing unused code and support for absolutely
ancient operating systems (4.2BSD [ca. 1983], Ultrix, AIX version 3,
NeXTstep) and just focusing on POSIX+a simple system dependent library as a
target environment reduced line counts by a third; I figure I can strip out
another 1,000 or so lines by simplifying and correcting some of the logic.
There's at least one faily major security hole lurking in newuser which,
only due to a misconfiguration, isn't exploitable on grex at the moment.  I
think working towards a viable replacement for Picospan is a worthy goal.

Like Cyklone, I think process is important and it would be well to impose
some on grex.

Yes, root access would be required for a lot of this.
tod
response 88 of 92: Mark Unseen   Oct 15 00:49 UTC 2006

3DES..then the hard stuff
slynne
response 89 of 92: Mark Unseen   Oct 15 02:25 UTC 2006

resp:87 Ok, I'll admit that I dont understand most of that. But, I will
print it out and will bring it up at the next board meeting where I am
sure at least some of my fellow board members will know what it means. I
will let you know the outcome of that discussion shortly after the
meeting which is in just under two weeks. 
cyklone
response 90 of 92: Mark Unseen   Oct 15 03:53 UTC 2006

"I'll admit that I dont understand most of that." Now you now how I feel ;)

I'm glad you're bringing it up for discussion. IMNSHO, that's exactly the kind
of thing the board should be looking at. Thanks.
naftee
response 91 of 92: Mark Unseen   Oct 15 18:06 UTC 2006

re 88
not alcohol, silly !
cross
response 92 of 92: Mark Unseen   Oct 16 02:34 UTC 2006

Regarding #89; Okay, Thanks.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   62-86   87-92      
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss