|
Grex > Coop13 > #101: Cyberspace Communications finances for January 2004 | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 155 responses total. |
keesan
|
|
response 86 of 155:
| 
Feb 13 18:04 UTC 2004 |
I have not kicked people out. I use tools to avoid having to deal with the
messes they make, such as the ignore command, or fixseen when someone posts
all over agora or scribbles all over agora. If everyone did this the vandals
might get bored and go away.
|
jp2
|
|
response 87 of 155:
|
Feb 13 18:09 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
albaugh
|
|
response 88 of 155:
|
Feb 13 18:28 UTC 2004 |
All that is fine, but it isn't about changing *grex* in any way - it's about
people essentially developing thicker skins or the ilk. And that isn't
something "grex" can do, other than perhaps posting a "warning" during
newuser or other places. So, while people leaving grex because they were
stressed out over the item killing kaper may be unfortunate, unless grex is
to become a private members-only club where no mean / nasty people would ever
show up, those as bailed, well "sorry to see you go, but..."
|
tod
|
|
response 89 of 155:
|
Feb 13 19:25 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
anderyn
|
|
response 90 of 155:
|
Feb 13 19:39 UTC 2004 |
I think that a warning about this being the internet, etc. might be
appropriate. Seriously.
|
scott
|
|
response 91 of 155:
|
Feb 13 19:40 UTC 2004 |
*I* can develop a thicker skin. What about the jerks who are also driving
away new users, by entering abusive responses in party or Agora item 1?
|
iggy
|
|
response 92 of 155:
|
Feb 13 19:53 UTC 2004 |
i highly doubt new users are helpless, defenseless little bunnies that need
someone charging in on a white horse and chainmail to protect them.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 93 of 155:
|
Feb 13 19:57 UTC 2004 |
re91: i'll assume that you consider me to be one of *the jerks*
who are the newusers who i have driven away? i want names
scott. in fact i want names of any folks who have been
driven away by *the jerks*
|
keesan
|
|
response 94 of 155:
|
Feb 13 20:46 UTC 2004 |
That is not the point. If I were a potential user of grex, and the first and
probably only thing I saw here was name-calling, I would go away.
|
scott
|
|
response 95 of 155:
|
Feb 13 21:11 UTC 2004 |
Re 93: Easy enough. I'm not calling you one of the
jerks-who-are-trying-to-drive-people-away. I'm referring more to polytarp.
Although I'll certainly give you an honorary "jerk" for your pointless demand
for essentially uncollectable data. ;)
|
albaugh
|
|
response 96 of 155:
|
Feb 13 21:34 UTC 2004 |
I don't see any way that grex can remain "grex" and at the same time preclude
jerky users.
|
tod
|
|
response 97 of 155:
|
Feb 13 21:57 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
krj
|
|
response 98 of 155:
|
Feb 13 22:00 UTC 2004 |
"Grex: Where The Weak Are Killed and Eaten."
|
cyklone
|
|
response 99 of 155:
|
Feb 13 22:13 UTC 2004 |
"Grex: Doing Personal Favors For Favored Persons"
|
tod
|
|
response 100 of 155:
|
Feb 13 22:19 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
anderyn
|
|
response 101 of 155:
|
Feb 13 22:21 UTC 2004 |
So we do personal favors for favored persons. How do I get on the a-list?
Enquiring minds want to know.
|
scott
|
|
response 102 of 155:
|
Feb 13 23:06 UTC 2004 |
Founding a Grex and writing a great deal of its software, spending at least
5 years on the board and over 10 years on staff... yeah, good thing we got
rid of that worthless valerie person.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 103 of 155:
|
Feb 13 23:14 UTC 2004 |
Re #91: You have the same four choices about them, Scott. With the
additional note that you *could* restrict certain items or
conferences to "approved" users or "approved" posts while still
leaving the rest of the system open -- but those restricted areas
wouldn't really be very Grex-like. I suspect a lot of people
you value wouldn't be comfortable in moderated or restricted
places.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 104 of 155:
|
Feb 13 23:31 UTC 2004 |
(I think you missed his point, Joe; or maybe he didn't express it very weil:
how to keep new users who who are turned off by the 'jerks'?)
|
tod
|
|
response 105 of 155:
|
Feb 13 23:34 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 106 of 155:
|
Feb 14 00:01 UTC 2004 |
What?
|
cyklone
|
|
response 107 of 155:
|
Feb 14 00:33 UTC 2004 |
Re #101: It apparently involves claims of grievous injury resulting
in Victim Identification.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 108 of 155:
|
Feb 14 00:42 UTC 2004 |
Re #102: Nobody got rid of her. She got rid of herself. Everyone else
who was parodied is still here and actively participating.
|
tod
|
|
response 109 of 155:
|
Feb 14 00:55 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
robh
|
|
response 110 of 155:
|
Feb 14 02:27 UTC 2004 |
So who else *is* being parodied there, anyway?
|