response 9 of 28:

Sep 20 23:36 UTC 2006

Re resp:4: I've heard that Windows 2000 and up can be scripted quite 
powerfully using Visual Basic -- apparently they can run VB scripts 
just like they can run batch files.  Documentation on this feature 
seems to be hard to come by, though.


Re resp:7: They changed the Finder to act more like Windows Explorer, 
which doesn't open a window each time you open a new folder, either.  
You can certainly still open multiple Finder windows.  There's also a 
feature where, if you're dragging a file and hover the mouse over a 
folder, that folder opens.  This makes it pretty easy to drill down 
when copying files.

As far as asking for the disk back, at least the Mac knows what it 
wants in that situation.  I've seen Windows silently fail in baffling 
ways when it needed data off a disk I'd just ejected.  (For 
example...save a Word file to floppy, take out the floppy, then try to 
print.  The floppy drive runs for a second, then nothing happens.)

response 11 of 28:

Sep 20 23:44 UTC 2006

Heh!

response 13 of 28:

Sep 21 00:39 UTC 2006

Further to #8: any apps you want there appear in the dock. Running apps are
indicated with a pointer. The dock is both a menu of frequently used apps and
tabs for running apps. 

response 15 of 28:

Sep 21 18:29 UTC 2006

I haven't had those problems either.  I've been using a Powerbook 
running OS X as my principal computer for 2.5 years now.

Re #7:  Another way to eject something in OS X is to control-click (or 
middle-click, if you have a 3-button mouse) on its desktop icon and 
select "Eject" from the context menu that pops up.  Very Windows-ish.

You can now set a preference for whether directories open in new finder 
windows or an existing window.

I've become very fond of the dock and use it heavily, not just for 
applications but for frequently accessed files and folders.  If you drag 
a folder to the dock, you can open a menu of its contents by control-
clicking with the mouse; then select an item with the mouse or the arrow 
keys.  Very handy for navigating the system; saves me having to grapple 
with finder windows, which I find to be rather tedious.

One surprise that I didn't run across for a while - despite the 
underlying Darwin Unix system, file names in OS X are case-independent, 
so that e.g. you can't have two files named 'mail' and 'Mail' in the 
same directory.  I haven't run into a problem with this, but I can 
envision circumstances where it *could* be a problem.

response 17 of 28:

Sep 21 23:06 UTC 2006

Does that depend on the underlying filesystem?  Is MacOS X case-
sensitive on ffs or e2fs?

response 19 of 28:

Sep 22 01:02 UTC 2006

I don't know about ext2.  I UFS on Mac OS X is, as Jeff says, case sensitive.
But the default filesystem is HFS+, which is case preserving but case
insensitive.  That is, if I name a file, "Foo", it will be named "Foo" (as
opposed to "foo" or "FOO"), but I can access it by any name in the set
{[Ff][Oo][Oo]}.

response 21 of 28:

Sep 25 18:33 UTC 2006

 re #15, 17:  It *does* depend on the filesystem.  If you create an HFS+
 filesystem on a partition the Apple Disk Utility will ask you if you want
 filenames to be case-sensitive or not.  Because practically every other
 MacOS X machine in existence came pre-formatted from Apple without case
 sensitivity turned on it's usually a bad idea to choose it unless you've
 got an overpowering reason for doing so.

response 23 of 28:

Oct 21 22:04 UTC 2006

The new mac OS (Tiger is the most recent, Leopard scheduled for release in
spring of 07) is more customizable than any of the apple OS's to date.  If
you have a mac, I strongly suggest subscribing to a magazine called macaddict
(you can subscribe at www.macaddict.com).  Occasionally you will find
different "easter eggs" that simply need to be turned on using the terminal.
And these hidden features are usually VERY helpful (dock like egg from 10.3).
On top of that, I've been using UNIX or the freeware LINUX releases (most
recently, Yellow Dog Linux) on my macs for many years, and since the release
of the first developer preview of mac os x, I've found myself using linux less
and less and the terminal in x more.  In fact, that's what I'm using now. 
I for one happen to enjoy the command line interface of the terminal, and it
kind of reminds me of college.  I can write the programs that I need to in
C++, and they run perfectly.  Not to mention, apple's developer tools that
are included free offer a very easy to use programming environment.  When
neither of those suit what I want to do, there's always REALbasic.  I'm sorry,
but the best move apple made was switching from the classic OS that had gotten
stale to X.  The power granted to knowledgable users is simply unheard of.
However, the classic OS has it's major up points too.  For one, security. 
I'm not sure if anyone remembers when WebDAV ran a contest offering $100,000
to anyone who could hack their mac web server.  Guess what, the mac won.  That
was running mac OS 8.5.  Again, you have to look at what each system offers,
and then make that decision based on your greatest need.  I still have an
older mac that I use for my home automation server for that reason alone. 
When I leave work I can hop online before I walk out the door, and change the
heat, have a pot of coffee waiting, have the dogs let out to go to the
bathroom on a schedule, or check my alarm system status.  I use it because
it's secure, no one else can log in without my security key and change any
settings or disarm the alarm.  And yes, it requires a hardware key that is
plugged into a USB port, the program on there then runs, and tells my server
that it's actually me.  It's just easier.  But for all the video and design
work that I do at home, I use X.  The other big bonus to the new OS is all
of the open source software that's available.  Just my opinion.

As far as the case-sensitivity on the file system, it most assuredly depends
on the format of the drive.  Look at unix file systems (UFS), they very highly
depend on the case.

response 25 of 28:

Oct 21 22:36 UTC 2006

With the BSD base system, apple has opened itself to numerous security holes.
For that reason, when we run the software update, many times, there are
security patches that have to be downloaded and installed.  BSD base gives
us both the good and sadly, the bad.  As far as viruses are concerned, when
it comes to any mac os, they are quite lucky, as there are almost none in
existance.  But on the topic of security, I have an app installed called
NetBarrier by Intego.  Thankfully I've installed it, or I would have been
hacked quite a few times.  With the programming work I do, I have a handful
of traps that I've built into the kernal of the system just to be safe. 
Again, with the BSD base system, hackers are able to hack the MacOS more
easily, where with >OS9, they had to be using a mac, and have a great deal
of knowledge, or installed a back door program from the computer itself.

response 27 of 28:

Oct 21 22:43 UTC 2006

Point.