|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 170 responses total. |
clees
|
|
response 78 of 170:
|
Jul 9 06:41 UTC 2002 |
Being single for a long time makes you lose part of your sex drive as
well. (lack of practice, guess) That reminds me of dr. Ruth: 'use it or
lose it'. Celibate by choice, but not the first choice.
Yet, I am certain things might stirr again (grin) once I start dating
again, or meet somebody I can relate to. One night stands just for
physical pleasure has never been my cup of tea. Fortunately I am not
really depressed about it.
|
slynne
|
|
response 79 of 170:
|
Jul 9 15:13 UTC 2002 |
Well, even if a person is single, one can still have a sex life. You
know...develop a relationship with your hand ;)
|
edina
|
|
response 80 of 170:
|
Jul 9 18:08 UTC 2002 |
Amen, sister, amen.
|
swargler
|
|
response 81 of 170:
|
Jul 10 01:18 UTC 2002 |
I read an article today in the Chicago Tribune "Depression looks more like
a physical thing".
http://www.chicagotribune.com/features/health/chi-0207070369jul07.story?col
l=c
hi%2Dleisurefamily%2Dhed
Basically, it says advances in brain-imaging technology like PET and fMRI may
indicate that depression may be more physical than functional. An excerpt:
"Before we had the new imaging technology, we couldn't get inside the brain;
it was just a black box," said Dr. Jan Fawcett, chief of psychiatry at
Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center.
"Now, if you look at the PET scans of people with just depression, what you
see is a shutting down of activity in their frontal lobes," he said. "It won't
explain all depressions, but it'll explain many causes of depression. The most
important thing it'll do is to show that depression should be considered a
medical illness."
The new findings should go a long way in helping to end the long-standing
debate over whether depression is organic or functional. Organic means there
are physical and chemical changes in the brain that produce depression;
functional means it's purely psychological.
"It used to be thought that there was nothing really physical in the brain
that's causing depression," said Dr. Emil Coccaro, a University of Chicago
professor of psychiatry. "Now we're actually starting to focus on the organic
reasons for these behavioral problems and to locate where they are."
A massive problem
Understanding the causes of depression is vital because the problem is
massive. About 1.5 million Americans suffer brain injuries each year, and 25
percent to 40 percent will experience depression, many of those with lifelong
depression.
Post #65 seems to go along with this. I wonder if regular short term
depression (due to bad things happening like death of loved ones) tend to be
functional and long and recurring depressions tend to have physical origins.
I've been guilty in the past of suggesting to someone with depression that
they just needed to change their attitude. A family member who later opted
out of life, which made me very depressed for a while. But after a while,
I found not dwelling on what happened, prevented depression. So the attitude
thing seemed to work for me (after a while), but I probably wouldn't suggest
that to someone with chronic or long term depression.
|
gull
|
|
response 82 of 170:
|
Jul 10 12:42 UTC 2002 |
Hopefully this discovery will help reduce the stigma that's currently
attached to depression and mental health care in general.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 83 of 170:
|
Jul 10 16:22 UTC 2002 |
no kidding. This is good. I know there are studies for chemical
causes of bipolar disorders; it shouldn't be unreal that unipolar
disorders shouldn't have roots in chemical imbalance.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 84 of 170:
|
Jul 10 16:53 UTC 2002 |
There are actually a lot of studies out there demonstrating that depression
is biologically real, this is just the latest one to get picked up in the
media. A friend of mine is a PhD in biopsychology, and it's frankly pretty
well established -- understanding the mechanisms themselves, and the etiology
of depression, is a different story.
|
slynne
|
|
response 85 of 170:
|
Jul 10 17:44 UTC 2002 |
While they have determined that depression is biologically real and
that there are measurable differences in brain chemistry between those
with depression and those who arent depressed, they have no idea what
causes depression. They dont know if the observable brain chemistry of
depressed people is the cause of depression or not. They have not ruled
out functional depression.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 86 of 170:
|
Jul 10 18:24 UTC 2002 |
All true.
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 87 of 170:
|
Jul 10 19:18 UTC 2002 |
There is also the understanding that MDs and Psychiatrists often
prescribe antidepressants in combination with one another, though there
are some that you cannot mix at all. Wellbutrin increases the levels
of norepinphrine and dopamine and is primarily a stimulant to brain
activity, and Celexa is an an SSRI. These drugs work with different
chemicals in the brain.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 88 of 170:
|
Jul 10 19:37 UTC 2002 |
...and nobody really understands why they work for depression.
|
brighn
|
|
response 89 of 170:
|
Jul 10 20:04 UTC 2002 |
or whether they do, for that matter (the effect of SSRIs isn't that much
better than placebo).
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 90 of 170:
|
Jul 10 21:04 UTC 2002 |
True, though placebos can apparently work very well for depression...
|
brighn
|
|
response 91 of 170:
|
Jul 10 21:17 UTC 2002 |
Sure. Just don't tell people it's a placebo, and they do wonders.
Which means that depression really IS heavily perspectually, but I don't think
very many people really ever questioned that.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 92 of 170:
|
Jul 11 06:44 UTC 2002 |
Well, yes-- cognitive therapy *is* a fairly good approach, and meds
rarely are even close to 100% of the answer.
|
brighn
|
|
response 93 of 170:
|
Jul 11 13:22 UTC 2002 |
"perspectually"? Wow. How the Hell did I mangle it THAT bad?
Oh well, I guess y'all knew what I meant.
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 94 of 170:
|
Jul 11 13:58 UTC 2002 |
It is definitely an issue that is not black and white. The reasons
behind depression and what perpetuates depression are so many and the
varying treatments--both medical and otherwis--so numerous that it
makes sense that individuals perceived as having depression be
considered on an indivisual basis.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 95 of 170:
|
Jul 11 18:05 UTC 2002 |
Part of the problem, too, is that nobody's really sure where the line is
between physical and psychological causes. After all, thoughts -- at least,
as we understand them now -- are events in the brain, and the brain is a
physical thing. It's very hard to come up with a medically useful definition
of a psychological cause that will actually distinguish it from a physical
one. But, like pornography, everyone's convinced that there is such a thing
as a psychological problem, and that they know it when they see it.
|
amethyst
|
|
response 96 of 170:
|
Jul 11 19:41 UTC 2002 |
From a personal point of view, I would have to say depression must have
a fair physical basis. I've been diagnosed with dysthymia (as has my
father and brother). All three of us have tried various drugs (I took
Paxil, my brother took Zoloft, I don't know what else dad tried), and
NONE of us responded well to those. All three of us responded well
to wellbutrin (I felt like I was on speed, which was what I needed to
get up and get going). Also, all three of us eventually quit taking
wellbutrin because it wasn't helping any more. This was over different
time spans for each of us, and we didn't necessarily know any of the
others were or weren't taking anything. So it's a small sample, but
to ME it points pretty clearly to some sort of genetic link. I've also
thought of going back on wellbutrin, but when i call the psychiatric
center to see if there is information on antidepressant tolerance they
refer me to my insurance company, which is less than helpful.
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 97 of 170:
|
Jul 11 21:25 UTC 2002 |
That's the biggest barrier to getting competent care for mental heath,
besides the shortcomings of individual patient involved -- Insurance
Companies.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 98 of 170:
|
Jul 12 10:00 UTC 2002 |
yeah =P Insurance coverage for mental health sucks.
|
keesan
|
|
response 99 of 170:
|
Jul 12 12:45 UTC 2002 |
But that at least keeps the cost of insurance a bit lower.
Zoloft is also used for obsessive-compulsive disorder and other things.
Serotonin seems to have lots of different functions.
|
edina
|
|
response 100 of 170:
|
Jul 12 13:53 UTC 2002 |
My insurance for my mental health care is actually quite good.
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 101 of 170:
|
Jul 12 14:48 UTC 2002 |
My insurance coverage is pretty decent for mental health. But they way
that administer the mental health portion of their services is not.
You have to call a specific number and tghey'll give you a list of
names from a list, and you go and see if they are taking patients. So
you can't even go to the therapist you want if they do not take your
insurance. So I dedcided that I would go on my own and find a
therapist and opay for it myself. It's not cheap, but I didn't like
the alternative and could afford to avoid it. I get the prescriptions
for antidepressants from my MD, who is cleared to speak with my
psychologist. So insurance does in fact help me out
|
lynne
|
|
response 102 of 170:
|
Jul 12 18:57 UTC 2002 |
My health insurance is through MIT. They jump three feet in the air, rush
you to the mental health center, and hand out one free straitjacket for each
friend brought in with depression. Something to do with the suicide rate....
|