|
Grex > Coop13 > #43: Account of Board Candidate Terminated | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 130 responses total. |
jep
|
|
response 78 of 130:
|
Dec 4 21:50 UTC 2003 |
That's good.
It does leave a question or two in my mind, though:
Did you know it was against Grex system policy to send mass e-mails?
Did you know it would cause a big drain for the system? If not, with
your background, how could you not have known?
|
jp2
|
|
response 79 of 130:
|
Dec 5 00:08 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
naftee
|
|
response 80 of 130:
|
Dec 5 04:20 UTC 2003 |
It's called 'nice' , n00b.
|
gull
|
|
response 81 of 130:
|
Dec 5 13:48 UTC 2003 |
nice wouldn't have helped either, probably, if the problem was sendmail
using up too much CPU trying to make all the deliveries.
|
jp2
|
|
response 82 of 130:
|
Dec 5 13:51 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
naftee
|
|
response 83 of 130:
|
Dec 5 16:40 UTC 2003 |
I've never seen the load averages jump over 6 or 7 when mass-mailing with
nice.
|
remmers
|
|
response 84 of 130:
|
Dec 5 17:59 UTC 2003 |
On Grex?
|
naftee
|
|
response 85 of 130:
|
Dec 5 19:20 UTC 2003 |
Yes.
|
naftee
|
|
response 86 of 130:
|
Dec 6 00:09 UTC 2003 |
By the way, all the accounts that recieved the mail were off-site. I think
there was a sleep process as well. Only a person who didn't care about how
the system would run would neglect those two points.
|
jp2
|
|
response 87 of 130:
|
Dec 6 13:36 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
naftee
|
|
response 88 of 130:
|
Dec 6 15:55 UTC 2003 |
I hope you're moving that mail off-site.
|
valerie
|
|
response 89 of 130:
|
Dec 7 02:10 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 90 of 130:
|
Dec 7 02:15 UTC 2003 |
If the email size limit wasn't *in* newuser at the time jp2 registered, how
was he tohave known? And besides Jamie, how is anyone that has registered that
long ago supposed to know the limit on email?
|
naftee
|
|
response 91 of 130:
|
Dec 7 02:20 UTC 2003 |
jp2's probably storing that 5mb odd replied mail on-site, thus filling up user
partitions. Once again, jp2's back to his old tricks. When will you people
learn.
|
keesan
|
|
response 92 of 130:
|
Dec 7 02:50 UTC 2003 |
When we sent out 100 copies of a message it was for the Kiwanis club. Would
it have been better to space them out over a few days? (#69)
|
valerie
|
|
response 93 of 130:
|
Dec 7 02:57 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
valerie
|
|
response 94 of 130:
|
Dec 7 02:57 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 95 of 130:
|
Dec 7 03:02 UTC 2003 |
Oh, I'm not saying that the fact that this information wasn't available at
the time that jp registered should acquit him of wht he did. Just curious as
to how people should get to know that certain things like mass-emailing is
not acceptable if they weren't told when they made their account and were
never told or there was no chance to read about it elsewhere
|
jp2
|
|
response 96 of 130:
|
Dec 7 05:02 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
jp2
|
|
response 97 of 130:
|
Dec 7 05:08 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
gull
|
|
response 98 of 130:
|
Dec 8 15:54 UTC 2003 |
Grex also suffers "collateral damage" from mass mailers -- they tend to
result in us getting blacklisted by SpamCop. SpamCop only seems to need
one complaint to trigger this.
|
jp2
|
|
response 99 of 130:
|
Dec 8 16:10 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
gull
|
|
response 100 of 130:
|
Dec 8 17:20 UTC 2003 |
And your point is?
|
jp2
|
|
response 101 of 130:
|
Dec 8 18:19 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
willcome
|
|
response 102 of 130:
|
Dec 8 19:23 UTC 2003 |
Not quite when, is it.
|