|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 109 responses total. |
scott
|
|
response 75 of 109:
| 
Feb 12 15:30 UTC 2004 |
They've dropped out of other conferences they used to habituate, and they seem
to come back here only because they keep getting dragged back into the
discussion.
|
iggy
|
|
response 76 of 109:
|
Feb 12 18:29 UTC 2004 |
but how would they KNOW that if they have left for good? And more
importantly, WHY WOULD THEY CARE?
|
tod
|
|
response 77 of 109:
|
Feb 12 18:44 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
other
|
|
response 78 of 109:
|
Feb 12 19:17 UTC 2004 |
Do you even REALIZE the utter senselessness of your phrase "fascist
resulting votes?"
The membership of Grex chose to allow this one-time single (or double)
violation to stand out of respect for the real concerns of the people
involved (call it favors for favored persons if you like, but the fact
remains that the majority of the membership SUPPORTED that one-time
choice). The policy is unchanged from what it was before, and the
general respect for and appreciation of the rights of free speech are
unaltered by these events. The blue ribbon *properly* represents the
policies and general practices of this organization.
If you cannot accept that a significant majority of the Grex membership
agrees with this statement, then you are free to leave. To continue to
state that there is either a policy or any practice of wrongful
abrogation of free speech on Grex not only flies in the face of the
facts but marks you as either incapable of appreciating the subtleties
of meaning involved or engaged in a desperate attempt to sabotage this
community and destroy the ability of those who support it to enjoy what
they have created. The terms sound hyperbolic, but that is the only
impact.
|
krj
|
|
response 79 of 109:
|
Feb 12 19:18 UTC 2004 |
So where were all you arguers when the Sex conference was annihilated?
|
jp2
|
|
response 80 of 109:
|
Feb 12 19:32 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
other
|
|
response 81 of 109:
|
Feb 12 19:38 UTC 2004 |
On the contrary, a tyranny of the majority is Democracy.
|
jp2
|
|
response 82 of 109:
|
Feb 12 19:42 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
other
|
|
response 83 of 109:
|
Feb 12 19:48 UTC 2004 |
You fall into the trap of assuming that there is any objective measure
of the legitimacy of Grex's democracy other than that accepted by the
majority of its membership. I suggest giving up this line of argument,
because you can't win.
|
tod
|
|
response 84 of 109:
|
Feb 12 19:58 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
jp2
|
|
response 85 of 109:
|
Feb 12 20:01 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
other
|
|
response 86 of 109:
|
Feb 12 20:06 UTC 2004 |
84: "none of those supporting censorship in their vote were affected by
the deletions"
Prove it.
85: If the stiffness of your penis is the indication we're to rely
upon to determine legitimacy, then you'll have to post photos and prove
to our satisfaction the functionality of the instrument.
|
tod
|
|
response 87 of 109:
|
Feb 12 20:11 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
jp2
|
|
response 88 of 109:
|
Feb 12 20:14 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
anderyn
|
|
response 89 of 109:
|
Feb 12 20:53 UTC 2004 |
My text was in fact affected by the vote. Stuff that I held valuable (things
I wrote about Griffin and his birth, and his development, for example). But
I voted for the continued deletion of the items anyway, because I felt that
it was in fact not censorship after the fact. If someone buys/collects every
issue of _Current_ that has something I wrote in it and destroys them, I don't
think that I was censored. I was published. It just didn't last. Big whoop.
|
tod
|
|
response 90 of 109:
|
Feb 12 21:30 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 91 of 109:
|
Feb 13 12:56 UTC 2004 |
I too had posted in Valerie's items and in jeps items. I had text that was
affected by the vote. I voted not to restore the items.
|
cyklone
|
|
response 92 of 109:
|
Feb 13 13:44 UTC 2004 |
Yes, but you could have voted to restore and then voluntarily deleted your
posts. Instead you voted to impose your will on MY words without any clear
evidence justifying such a drastic action. Shame on all of you who voted
to do a personal favor for a favored person at the expense of us less
favored persons.
|
md
|
|
response 93 of 109:
|
Feb 13 13:59 UTC 2004 |
Mkay! ;-)
|
tod
|
|
response 94 of 109:
|
Feb 13 17:51 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
naftee
|
|
response 95 of 109:
|
Feb 14 04:41 UTC 2004 |
biatch
|
janc
|
|
response 96 of 109:
|
Feb 17 01:42 UTC 2004 |
Yes, Valerie has really left. If jp2's proposal comes up for a vote again,
I'll tell her and she'll log in and vote against it again. If anything else
happens that I think she might want to give input on, I'll tell her and she
may want to log in. I might spend a couple sentances a week telling her about
interesting developments in the lives of Grex users. I still occasionally
ask her technical questions about Grex's operations. But I do not expect her
ever to rejoin Grex in any substantial way. I have no idea if she intends
to renew her membership when it comes due.
|
naftee
|
|
response 97 of 109:
|
Feb 17 04:05 UTC 2004 |
her baby's almost due
|
rational
|
|
response 98 of 109:
|
Feb 17 04:15 UTC 2004 |
Is that whore pregnant again?
|
anderyn
|
|
response 99 of 109:
|
Feb 17 05:57 UTC 2004 |
That was really disgusting, you two (rational and naftee). What in the world
could condone insulting someone like that?
|