|
Grex > Helpers > #129: Grex System Announcements - Winter 2003/2004 |  |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 107 responses total. |
naftee
|
|
response 75 of 107:
| 
Jan 29 05:25 UTC 2004 |
Sure thing
|
matrix
|
|
response 76 of 107:
|
Jan 29 21:32 UTC 2004 |
hey is this conference still on???
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 77 of 107:
|
Jan 30 01:25 UTC 2004 |
Re #73: I've never looked at the law on minors and checking accounts, but
it's a general principle that minors can't be held to contracts
unless they're for necessities.
|
gull
|
|
response 78 of 107:
|
Jan 30 14:51 UTC 2004 |
Re resp:76: It disappears when you're not observing it.
|
drew
|
|
response 79 of 107:
|
Jan 30 20:17 UTC 2004 |
Re #77:
Why are "necessities" an exception?
|
gelinas
|
|
response 80 of 107:
|
Feb 4 03:37 UTC 2004 |
grex locked up this evening when /usr/local filled up. I'm trying to free
up some space on the drive now.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 81 of 107:
|
Feb 4 04:03 UTC 2004 |
I freed up some space on /usr/local. I don't think another reboot is needed
now.
|
aruba
|
|
response 82 of 107:
|
Feb 4 05:56 UTC 2004 |
Why did /usr/local fill up?
|
gelinas
|
|
response 83 of 107:
|
Feb 4 06:06 UTC 2004 |
Not sure. I'd been collecting core files /user/local/etc/domain, and there
was another in /usr/local/etc/newuser. Removing the named core files freed
up a bit space, roughly 40 percent of the disk.
|
tsty
|
|
response 84 of 107:
|
Feb 4 08:41 UTC 2004 |
zoundz, them's a buncha cores ... i thought core files were identified
somehow as 'do not save'
thankx for 40%back
savngs accounts are openable by minors, at least in missouri in the 50s.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 85 of 107:
|
Feb 4 11:34 UTC 2004 |
I'd been hoping to use the core files to figure out why named keeps crashing.
It turns out we don't have enough information to solve the problem, and time
is better spent migrating.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 86 of 107:
|
Feb 5 00:05 UTC 2004 |
Re #79: I'm not sure.
|
boltwitz
|
|
response 87 of 107:
|
Feb 8 00:56 UTC 2004 |
TWILA that I'm directly responsible for twenty-two of the last fourty-seven
names keesan has twit-filtered.
|
naftee
|
|
response 88 of 107:
|
Feb 8 04:21 UTC 2004 |
Hey sweet; you and jp2 are like the only regulars.
|
remmers
|
|
response 89 of 107:
|
Feb 29 20:34 UTC 2004 |
The polls are open now through March 9 on a member proposal to restore
some deleted bbs items. Type vote at a Unix shell prompt, !vote at
most other prompts, to see the proposal or cast a ballot. For
discussion, see Coop item 112.
|
munkey
|
|
response 90 of 107:
|
Mar 9 00:28 UTC 2004 |
Does anyone keep party logs from 1995?
|
jp2
|
|
response 91 of 107:
|
Mar 9 01:23 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
salad
|
|
response 92 of 107:
|
Mar 9 02:11 UTC 2004 |
heh
|
remmers
|
|
response 93 of 107:
|
Mar 15 17:43 UTC 2004 |
The motion to clarify Grex's policy on item deletion PASSED, 21 yes to
19 no, with 40 out of 77 eligible members voting. See Coop item 111
(item:coop,111) for related discussion.
|
keesan
|
|
response 94 of 107:
|
Mar 15 17:53 UTC 2004 |
Are the other 37 members actually receiving notification of the vote, for
instance by email? Not everyone logs in often enought o read the motd before
every vote, but they might be forwarding their email. This is a pretty low
voter turnout.
|
albaugh
|
|
response 95 of 107:
|
Mar 15 18:12 UTC 2004 |
The answer is "no". I have brought this idea up before, some said "good
idea", but it has never been implemented.
|
tod
|
|
response 96 of 107:
|
Mar 15 18:13 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
remmers
|
|
response 97 of 107:
|
Mar 15 18:30 UTC 2004 |
See item 111, response 154 of the Coop conference for the wording.
Backtalkers can click on this link ---> resp:coop,111,154
Re #94: Turnout isn't all that low compared to some past votes, but
I agree that email notification would be reasonable when a vote starts.
Meant to start doing it, but with the hyperactive recent voting activity
the idea kind of got lost in the shuffle, mentally speaking.
Would there be any objection to my doing it from now on, starting with
the current vote? It's on my own proposal, but I guess that's not a
conflict since anyone notified has the option of voting for or against.
I'd word the email to simply announce the vote, not advocate a particular
side.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 98 of 107:
|
Mar 15 18:33 UTC 2004 |
Sounds good to me, John.
|
albaugh
|
|
response 99 of 107:
|
Mar 15 18:55 UTC 2004 |
There is no "abuse" in announcing a member vote, regardless of whose proposal
it is.
|