|
Grex > Enigma > #379: Lynne's "I aint got no baby" Diary. | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 160 responses total. |
slynne
|
|
response 75 of 160:
|
Dec 11 14:50 UTC 2003 |
This morning, I heard a story on the radio about our Governor, Jennifer
Granholm s "Cool Cities" program which is designed to give everyone in
the country "mitten envy" Bless her heart, sometimes I think old Jenny
G. gets a little too cheerleader like. But I like the general idea of
the cool cities initiative. It is true that if one makes one's cities
attractive to younger people, they will want to live there which means
they will want to work there and might bring start up companies with
them. There is an economic benefit to promoting the arts!
This morning s story was pretty neat because they talked about how cool
the town I am living in is getting and how it is a model for
Granholm s "cool cities" initiative. They interviewed the owner of
Henrietta Fahrenheit which is a pretty neat store downtown. They not
only sell things but they really support the community and support the
arts in the community. (lots of cool links on their web page, btw)
There have been a lot of other really cool stores that have opened up
downtown as well. Lots of artists and such have started moving from Ann
Arbor which has really improved things in town a lot. I love living in
a community where things are going on. I love being able to walk to
good restaurants, live theater (granted, local amateur productions but
still ), live music, and well just stuff. I love that when I take my
dogs for a walk in the summer time, I run into people I know who are
also out walking to go shop or go out to eat or whatever.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 76 of 160:
|
Dec 11 19:06 UTC 2003 |
There's a similar thing going on in PIttsburgh right now, where we're having
a very hard time holding on to younger residents -- a harder time than
Michigan is, I'd say. I'm not sure if the program's showing any results, but
it's an interesting idea. Somehow, the idea of government-supported
"coolness" doesn't seem to likely to take off, though.
|
slynne
|
|
response 77 of 160:
|
Jan 5 20:14 UTC 2004 |
I have decided that grex doesnt make for a very good blog site since
part of the reason I want to keep a blog is so that some of my friends
who live far away can see what I am up to if they want. This is easier
if I have a site with a URL that is easy to hit. So if anyone is
interested, you are welcome to check out
http://lynne.tblog.com/
I cant make any claims that it is interesting but anyone is welcome to
read it.
|
remmers
|
|
response 78 of 160:
|
Jan 5 22:18 UTC 2004 |
You could create a page in your www directory that redirects to the
anonymous reading URL for this item. Then anybody could get to it via
the URL http://cyberspace.org/slynne/myblog.html. Not quite as simple
as lynne.tblog.com, but not bad either.
|
slynne
|
|
response 79 of 160:
|
Jan 6 13:57 UTC 2004 |
Thanks for the suggestion. I dont know if I'll do it but who knows? :)
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 80 of 160:
|
Jan 7 04:13 UTC 2004 |
Looks like you got two things going now-- so maybe this item could be
one flavor and the other site where your blog is at could be another.
*shrug*
|
slynne
|
|
response 81 of 160:
|
Jan 7 14:18 UTC 2004 |
I guess so. I'll cut and paste stuff from there here now and
again...when I think about it.
Last night I watched a documentary about Lustron Homes
http://www.lustron.org . This was especially interesting to me because
I used to live in a Lustron house.
It was a really cool house too. It is currently over 50 years old and
still has the original roof and siding. It has never even needed to be
painted. Talk about low maintenance! All the interior walls and doors
are made of metal. It had all kinds of cool built ins like shelves and
such. Metal cabinets in the kitchen and steel counter tops. Everything
in this house was durable as could be.
The only draw back it had was that in the summer, the house didnt
breathe well so the humidity would collect inside and make the carpets
dampish and slightly mildewy. Central air would have solved that
problem but we were just renting. We solved the problem by always
making sure we left the windows open and fans running.
I have a lot of personal memories of the place which I have with every
place I have lived. This was the first place I moved after I got back
from college in the Sault. I worked for minimum wage at a pet store and
rented this house with my friend Debbie and her first husband Jeff. We
were so poor. After we paid our rent, we barely had money left over for
other things. We used to go to Sam's Club to buy bulk noodles and sauce
which we would eat every day. I was in the best shape I have ever been
because I didnt even have bus fare in my budget so I started riding my
bike to work.
We were so poor that we didnt have much money for entertainment.
Because all the walls of the house were metal, everyone gave us magnets
for housewarming presents. We used to take those alphabet magnets and
write weird poetry on the walls for fun.
I wish I had taken some pictures of that but things like film and
developing werent in my budget then. I dont think I have a single
picture of that house. But, since there are so many just like it, I
guess I dont really need one. It's kind of charming in an ugly sort of
way.
|
slynne
|
|
response 82 of 160:
|
Jan 8 18:29 UTC 2004 |
I went to the local Howard Dean Meetup last night. It was pretty cool.
I didnt get to meet too many people because I am kind of shy. But, I
did sign up for a lot of things. I feel really energized by this
campaign. I am going to hand write letters and make phone calls from my
home. I am going to go out and pass out flyers. I am going to have
people over to my house for a "House Call". The only thing I didnt sign
up for was to pass out literature on the caucus day because I have
already volunteered to pass out literature on that day for a guy I know
who is running for county clerk.
I am so glad that I decided to work for this. This is the first time in
a long time that I havent felt politically helpless. Even if he loses,
I will be able to hold my head high and know that at least I worked to
change things and worked for what I believe in.
|
slynne
|
|
response 83 of 160:
|
Jan 8 19:10 UTC 2004 |
Hmmm. I think I will use this place to write about some of my personal
feelings about this whole business with the M-net "agora" parody. It
seems appropriate to talk about such things here.
While my comments in the one particular item involving valerie really
honestly were not made in a mean spirited way, there are other comments
in that conference that are somewhat mean spirited. I have been
engaging in some intraspection about why I would find such things funny
and just what is the difference between the parody posts of people I
like and those of people I dont like.
I admittedly parodied valerie a lot there. I also have parodied keesan
a lot too. But they are two people I really like and respect. In fact,
in those two particular cases, the traits I parodied are the very
traits I like *most* about them. This is especially true with keesan.
Her personality is so unique and interesting and while she does seem to
obsess over certain details, I am always impressed with just how very
functional her life is. In some ways I envy her and wish I could be
more like her (although most of the time I am pretty happy to be like
me).
This business has had me thinking a lot about a certain friend of mine
named Terry. He has one of the best dry sarcastic senses of humor of
anyone I know. When he mocks someone it is really funny. He could be a
professional comedian. But, when I first met him and he mocked me, it
did hurt my feelings. I had forgotten that. It hurt my feelings because
I thought it meant he didnt like me. Later on, when I realized that he
did like me I grew to like the way he mocked me.
On my very first backpacking trip (which was in November), I had over
done it. I had blisters on my feet. I was cold. I had slipped in the
mud and pulled a muscle in my leg that hurt so bad, I could barely
walk. Late in the day we came to a part of the trail with a huge hill.
I honestly didnt think I would make it up the hill. I started to cry.
First Terry mocked my crying. Then he ran up the hill and started
singing "Everybody Hurts" by REM. So, instead of crying, I soon
realized I was laughing. I joked about how I was going to climb that
hill just to punch him in the nose. We both laughed. I climbed the
hill. Anyhow, that is just a memory that has come back to me because of
all this business. Mostly because last September, I went to a wedding
of a person who also knows Terry and he and I spent almost an hour
mocking Terry and making fun of him even though he wasnt there. It
wasnt mean spirited at all but was rather a way of us dealing with his
absence at this function and how we all missed him a lot (he moved to
Hawaii about 3 years ago).
But, in that conference I also made fun of people I dont like or where
angry with at the time. That was mean spirited. It is no secret, for
instance, that I really dont like russ. He is just one of the most
horrible people I have ever met. But he is *really* fun to make fun of.
Whenever I have parodied him, it was more cutting than other things.
Mostly because I'm usually making fun of traits I dont like about him.
Even when I was making fun of his very few endearing qualities, it was
always done in a mean way. The thing I have to admit is that while I am
sorry that valerie's feelings have been hurt, I really dont care about
his feelings. I really dont. In his case, I realize that he could read
those items and think "Oh, I feel bad" and I wouldnt care. And even
though like most other people, I want to be liked, I dont really care
about his opinion so if he were to think, "Oh that Lynne is such a
bitch", that wouldnt bother me either. *shrug*
I have more thoughts about this but I am running out of time for the
moment. I'll post more later.
|
anderyn
|
|
response 84 of 160:
|
Jan 8 19:45 UTC 2004 |
I can understand the difference between teasing someone affectonately and
doing it because you're mad -- and it's one of the things that I think made
me the most unhappy -- while I don't *know* if I'm one of the people you don't
like, I don't feel like I'm good enough frends with anyone in that cf. for
them to have been doing it affectionately. (The only person I really really
know who was in that cf. was seldon, and he's not a very close friend.
Everyone else is someone online who I know a little bit.) And I certainly
think that the stuff about Bruce was mean and meant that way. Now, I
understand that he's not someone a lot of people like or understand, but I
happen to be somone who loves him and it makes me angry that people read him
wrong (because he is not good at expressing things on line, not really, and
he's much more emphatic than he means to be...) and the things that were said
on agora were so very wrong about him. End of that, though.
|
slynne
|
|
response 85 of 160:
|
Jan 8 20:28 UTC 2004 |
Honestly, you are not one of the people I dont like. But Bruce is
(although it isnt like I *hate* him, he just rubs me the wrong way
sometimes). I will admit that sometimes his politics piss me off. I
havent bothered to reread everything I have written in that conference
but probably some of the parody of Bruce was mean spirited on my part
especially if I was mocking a post that had made me angry in the first
place.
I can understand that it would make you angry that people read him
wrong. I have some people in my life who I love very much who often are
read wrong and disliked. Or at least that is how I feel (that they have
been read wrong) so I do understand where you are coming from. When
that happens, I just try to remember all the reasons why *I* love that
person because that is all that matters anyway.
|
other
|
|
response 86 of 160:
|
Jan 8 20:41 UTC 2004 |
It is unfortunate when someone chooses to engage in a debate in a medium in
which he or she are incapable of properly expressing him- or herself.
However, if he or she makes that choice, then he or she takes responsibility
for that shortcoming and must be prepared for the response it generates.
If the result is that said person throws things into the discussion and then
fails to support or otherwise follow them up, said person has to expect to
be treated as someone who is not interested and/or capable of carrying on a
discussion and valdating the points he or she tries to make. That pretty much
defines a failure in this context. When someone persists in an endeavor in
which they are plainly incompetent, they cannot expect to win much respect
from other participants in the endeavor.
|
anderyn
|
|
response 87 of 160:
|
Jan 8 21:04 UTC 2004 |
Oh, I understand that well, which is why I don't normally say much when people
argue with Bruce here on grex. If he can't debate it well, I'm not going to
do it for him (and I'm already far too identified with him in some people's
minds -- I AM different and hold my own opinions, which are definitely not
his in many cases).
But it still pisses me off to see things which I said which no one argued with
parodied -- slynne, the one that I recall that involved you was a bummed item
in which I mentioned that I'd been caught in game traffic. I wasn't doing it
to show "oooh, I'm so superior that I live in Ann Arbor". It was more of a
ticked thing that my friend and I had misjudged it, and that she'd gotten her
car dinged (because it was right after she'd been in a traffic accident and
had to have her car totalled, so she was PARANOID and blamed me for not
knowing when the game started). Maybe it was a convenient jumping off point
for parodying a person who is superior about living here, but I'm not that
person and I didn't enjoy being used as the straw man in that case. I say
"briarworld" because all the people at work do -- maybe it's precious, but
it's a habit picked up from them.
|
slynne
|
|
response 88 of 160:
|
Jan 8 21:42 UTC 2004 |
Ok. I found that post. That was one where the target was really a more
general Ann Arbor like attitude about football games that I have
noticed in other people and perhaps saw (or thought I saw) in your
original post. I dont remember exactly what I was thinking though. I
either saw some snobbishness (falsely apparently) or saw something that
was funny because even though it wasnt coming from a place of
snobbishness, could easily be twisted to fit such a thing. FWIW, I dont
generally think of you as an Ann Arbor snob.
I am sorry that youre angry but I cant really say that I am sorry I
posted that. I still think it is kind of funny, actually (the post you
mention, not that you are angry about it) but not so much because it is
a parody of *you* but because I have blended you with this very real
attitude that I see in a lot of people who live in Ann Arbor. I think
that kind of pretentiousness is comical.
|
slynne
|
|
response 89 of 160:
|
Jan 8 21:45 UTC 2004 |
Oh, and I will remember that you dont like this sort of thing and will
take that into consideration in the future.
|
anderyn
|
|
response 90 of 160:
|
Jan 8 21:57 UTC 2004 |
Thanks. That does help. I don't plan on going back to m-net often (if at all)
so I won't likely know what's going on there.
As for finding things funny, that is a good choice for a quote.
"De gustibus non est disputandem" -- "about taste, there is no disputing"
Or, what I think is hilarious is not your cup of tea, and vice versa. As I
said elsewhere, if it was kept to those people who appreciate it, I wouldn't
have found it funny, but I wouldn't have cared, either. It only became
upsetting when people who WERE hurt by it were told about it. Your post wasn't
that bad, in the scheme of things, truly, compared to some.
|
slynne
|
|
response 91 of 160:
|
Jan 8 22:28 UTC 2004 |
Ok. So some other thoughts about the some of the mean spirited comments
in that conference. I do use mean humor when I am angry. It helps me
deal with the anger. Sometimes I am reluctant to address someone
directly when a topic makes me angry. There are a number of reasons for
this ranging from a desire to avoid confrontation to a desire to get
out my feelings without derailing an active item with a total pissing
contest. Of course, I am not immune from doing that but there have been
times when I have been angry and decided to go make fun of someone
either in Mnet's flame conference or Mnet's agora conference because it
seemed better than expressing my anger more directly.
This is because expressing anger in a funny way is a method I use to
make myself not angry anymore. If I can laugh at something or someone,
I usually stop feeling angry. If there werent those conferences, I
would probably be doing the parody anyway but in email with folks. In
fact, I *do* parody people in email when I think it is too nasty to
post in a public place. This is a coping mechanism that has served me
well for all of my life. I dont think I am going to abandon it.
Also, being angry with someone is different from disliking them. I have
done mean parodies of people I love when they have made me angry.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 92 of 160:
|
Jan 9 02:03 UTC 2004 |
resp:83 I remember when one of the canuckleheads turned me on to
reading the agora parody and I found myself lampooned. I was a little
upset that some things were grossly distorted. I tried to be a sport
and laugh along for a while, but then I got fed up with agora itself.
So I read neither.
I decided to be a little more selective in what I choose to write to
Grex-- apparently, it's changed a lot. People will choose to
interpret things as they will, so only I can control what I choose to
say.
I'm not sure what to think. I know a lot of people think
parody/satire/lampoon is funny, but sometimes stop laughing once the
joke is about them. Or have this thing about ownership-- "sure X/Y/Z
jokes are funny, because I'm X/Y/Z." Not sure.
How could I ever describe myself, really? I can never present a true
picture to anyone... I could say I'm an INFJ (leaning on the P side)
on a Meyers-Briggs test and that might say something to some people,
but then it might not.
|
slynne
|
|
response 93 of 160:
|
Jan 9 02:24 UTC 2004 |
It is true that people often stop laughing when the joke is on them. I
have even felt hurt if a parody has hit too close to home. I am
selective about what I post here but not really because I am afraid
someone will make fun of me. It is more because it is a public place
and I tend to put forth a public face.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 94 of 160:
|
Jan 10 11:32 UTC 2004 |
Then you see what I mean.
|
slynne
|
|
response 95 of 160:
|
Jan 10 15:48 UTC 2004 |
Which isnt to say that I believe that grex is all pixels on a screen or
that I put forth a false me.
I have noticed that sometimes people seem to treat grex like some kind
of therapy group rather than something like a party. I used to
participate in a therapy group and I shared very personal things in
that context but that was because I trusted the other people in the
group and because there were clear rules about how group members were
to treat what was said there. I think I pretty much present myself here
the same way I do in real life if I were at a party with people I didnt
know too well.
|
anderyn
|
|
response 96 of 160:
|
Jan 10 16:49 UTC 2004 |
Ah, I don't go to parties with people I don't know too well. (My social life
revolves around a pretty small group, so I tend to expect things to be, hmmm,
intimate.) This is turning out to be a very interesting look at how different
people view this system and life in general. I don't mind teasing, but only
by people I know very well (at work for example, Andy at the desk beside mine
teases me, but I've known him for nineteen years and it's never beyond
comfortable bounds -- and fairly pc, because it's at work.)
|
slynne
|
|
response 97 of 160:
|
Jan 10 17:36 UTC 2004 |
I cant fault anyone for being surprised about the different outlooks
that people have about bbs conferencing and life in general. And even
though janc says that anyone who couldnt anticipate valerie's reaction
to the parody item is stupid, I really was surprised by it. I guess I
as guilty of expecting others to have similar views about such things
as anyone else is around here.
|
slynne
|
|
response 98 of 160:
|
Jan 10 17:37 UTC 2004 |
I want to share my thoughts about a recent post valerie made in coop
conference...
#1 of 1 by Valerie Mates (valerie) on Sat Jan 10 01:50:20 2004:
Some people have asked me why I deleted my old postings everywhere
on Grex. I deleted my old postings because of things that were said on
M-Net, not out of any desire to hurt Grex. On M-Net, they insist that
anything that is posted on Grex (or on M-Net, or anyplace else on the
Internet) is an open invitation to other people to use it in parodies on
M-Net. I do not wish to be parodied, and I do not wish to have my words
re-used by other people in any other way. So I am removing my words
in order to rescind an invitation that I had never intended to extend.
I do not wish to participate in M-Net's parody game, and if the only
way to opt out is removing myself from Grex, well, I think it's really
sad to have to do that, but so be it.
I shared the program that I wrote that lets people delete all of their
responses because other people had expressed the desire to remove their
words for the same reason.
|
slynne
|
|
response 99 of 160:
|
Jan 10 17:49 UTC 2004 |
Ok. This post reminded me of something from the baby diary. valerie
said some mean things about a woman who was supposed to be Arlo's
teacher this year but quit just before the school year started. By
cooincidence I happen to know this woman and while I am not close to
her now, I was at one time. I wasnt sure how I felt about that.
naturally, valerie has a right to write about her life and her
thoughts and feelings about things even if those thoughts are not too
pleasant thoughts about someone I know. Did my friend give valerie
permission to be discussed in a negative way with a wide audience on a
bbs system? In a sense, I have to say that she did. All of do. If I
drive like an asshole on my way to work and cut someone off and then
flip them off, they may mention that to people they know. They might
blog about it someplace. They might even make fun of me. If I happened
to do such a thing to someone I know, they might even identify me when
they make fun of me or say negative things about me.
I respect valerie's decision to remove her postings from grex even
though I personally believe it is a huge over-reaction. Just like I
would believe a person has a right to shut themselves inside their
house with the shades drawn in order to avoid any chance of anyone
making negative comments about them online somewhere. Still, that
doesnt seem like a healthy attitude at all. Well at least not if it
goes on for a long time. As a short term response to being very hurt, I
suppose it could be beneficial.
|