|
Grex > Coop13 > #376: The problems with Grex, e-mail and spam | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 480 responses total. |
slynne
|
|
response 75 of 480:
| 
Nov 18 00:24 UTC 2006 |
Yeah, maybe we should make filtering of tsty the default? No...I am not
seriously suggesting that but Geez-o-peets.
|
cyklone
|
|
response 76 of 480:
|
Nov 18 00:50 UTC 2006 |
He is becoming a system problem, however. I suppose it's his naive "the
squeaky wheel gets the grease" logic.
|
naftee
|
|
response 77 of 480:
|
Nov 18 01:24 UTC 2006 |
i think peats has a system problem
i mean tsty
|
denise
|
|
response 78 of 480:
|
Nov 18 01:36 UTC 2006 |
He's looking for attention; too bad for us he has to be obnoxious about it.
|
bru
|
|
response 79 of 480:
|
Nov 18 02:33 UTC 2006 |
so why don't you guys complain this much about herasleftnut, who is the
instigator of this.
|
cyklone
|
|
response 80 of 480:
|
Nov 18 03:05 UTC 2006 |
When is the last time he crapped up the cf? I'm sorry ts has somehow got a
problem blocking messages. Hopefully someone will have some helpful ideas.
I thought some had been posted already.
|
bru
|
|
response 81 of 480:
|
Nov 18 03:15 UTC 2006 |
yeah, I have a problem blocking messages as well, and staff is unable to tell m
me how to fix it. If they can't fix my conferencing problems, why can't tehy a
do something about people who abuse the system.
|
naftee
|
|
response 82 of 480:
|
Nov 18 04:24 UTC 2006 |
you type mesg n, bru. just make sure you don't write him back
|
bru
|
|
response 83 of 480:
|
Nov 19 14:00 UTC 2006 |
can't. it screwz up my whole tel session.
|
gull
|
|
response 84 of 480:
|
Nov 22 00:52 UTC 2006 |
Re resp:70: This is like asking physicists why they haven't shown some
progress towards unifying General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, or
asking why world hunger hasn't been solved yet. This is a complex
problem. Spammers are constantly changing their techniques to evade
filters, which are trying to block spam without blocking legitimate
messages. Additionally, the volume of spam being sent is continually
growing, so even if filters are effective, they often only slow the
rate of increase.
There's never going to be a complete solution to the spam problem
unless people can be convinced to completely abandon email as it exists
today and use something else. That seems unlikely to happen any time
soon.
For that matter, the problem of junk mail in real mail boxes has been
around even longer, and no one has solved that one yet, either.
Stop assuming that everyone in the world except you is incompetent.
|
keesan
|
|
response 85 of 480:
|
Nov 22 01:08 UTC 2006 |
It costs money to send paper junk mail, so there is much less of it, and most
of it comes from real and mostly reputable companies, who will take you off
their junk mail lists if you ask, or tell you where they bought their lists
so you can argue with the list supplier about it. Companies will also stop
sending you unwanted emails (don't give them your address when they ask for
it) but spammers will not, and it costs them almost nothing to send out 50
spams per recipient per day.
|
gull
|
|
response 86 of 480:
|
Nov 22 01:18 UTC 2006 |
And yet, in spite of this differences, people still get junk mail. I
tried putting my name on one of the no-junk-mail lists, and it was
marginally effective at best. So even in that easier scenario, there
isn't a perfect solution.
|
tsty
|
|
response 87 of 480:
|
Nov 22 03:18 UTC 2006 |
crucifying the messenger is soooooooooooooooooo much easier.
there is an exploit, apparently:
tsty: spew arrives.... how sweet the smell
herasleftnut: blocks dont work if I suspsend the shell during the flood
herasleftnut: its a long spanding bug
herasleftnut: that steve is stupid to fix
herasleftnut: .honkey
|
marcvh
|
|
response 88 of 480:
|
Nov 22 06:06 UTC 2006 |
Physical junk mail is very different from spam. Comparing them is
not particularly helpful.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 89 of 480:
|
Nov 22 06:29 UTC 2006 |
No, it isn't. Just like comparing it to telephone advertising isn't
helpful at all either.
"But what if we had a national do-not-spam list???"
AUGH.
|
tsty
|
|
response 90 of 480:
|
Nov 22 10:41 UTC 2006 |
T R I P L E T S !!!!
grex% f -m shutthefuckupkarenz
Login: shutthefuckupkarenz Name: la la la
Directory: /a/s/h/shutthefuckupkarenz Shell: /bin/csh
Last login Tue Nov 21 17:08 (EST) on ttypb from 66-52-181-171.oak.dasdial.com
No Mail.
No Plan.
grex% f -m herasleftnut
Login: herasleftnut Name: Dr Kim L
Directory: /a/h/e/herasleftnut Shell: /bin/csh
Last login Tue Nov 21 21:24 (EST) on ttypf from 66-52-181-187.oak.dasdial.com
Mail last read Tue Nov 21 22:23 2006 (EST)
No Plan.
grex% f -m krjsucksdick
Login: krjsucksdick Name: da
Directory: /a/k/r/krjsucksdick Shell: /bin/csh
Last login Tue Nov 21 16:16 (EST) on ttyp5 from 66-52-181-171.oak.dasdial.com
No Mail.
No Plan.
grex%
and WITH a plan:
Dear fatass nigger (aka aliz),
Unlike your homosexual ass that does nothing but waste bandwidth on grex, I
use this place to continue to abuse Jan's tel message. My final goal is get
to the point where I can totally break this fucking pos system. In some
respects I've been slowed up because of the funky learning curve associated
with C and Unix.
Here is what I'm working on:
1)I made the code more modular so it's easier to add and delete shit.
2)I came with up an alternate method to bypass the 4 tels and delay shit. I
say alternate because it is only in the concept stage.
3)I also have a crude but working method to bypass .nowrite.
|
tsty
|
|
response 91 of 480:
|
Nov 23 11:44 UTC 2006 |
denise ("you ignorant slut," SaturdayNightLive) ... you are next.
|
tsty
|
|
response 92 of 480:
|
Nov 24 05:15 UTC 2006 |
thre was supposed to be a <g!> up thre in #91 ...oops
|
naftee
|
|
response 93 of 480:
|
Nov 24 10:16 UTC 2006 |
oup
s
|
naftee
|
|
response 94 of 480:
|
Nov 28 03:43 UTC 2006 |
hi tsty !
|
tsty
|
|
response 95 of 480:
|
Nov 28 06:34 UTC 2006 |
'lo naft
|
tsty
|
|
response 96 of 480:
|
Nov 28 07:27 UTC 2006 |
aruba suggested scribbles of
8888888_____________________8888888
8888888____________________88888888
EOF (herasleftnut)
!mesg nTelegram from herasleftnut on ttyp3 at 21:13 EST ...
homo
homo
- good idea, as i find them. however ... system problem ...
every scribble results in
homo
Pipe interrupt?
Respond or pass? scribble 74
Segmentation fault
grex%
someting is not working right and delays the scribbles
|
cyklone
|
|
response 97 of 480:
|
Nov 28 13:35 UTC 2006 |
I've noticed the scribble problem lately, as well. When I scribble my telnet
screen disappears and I have to log in again.
|
remmers
|
|
response 98 of 480:
|
Nov 28 16:00 UTC 2006 |
Hm... Just did a test of "scribble" in the Test conference and verified
that Picospan does indeed segfault (after successfully completing the
scribble). In cyklone's case, that would log him off, since he uses the
bbs shell. I wonder if this is new behavior.
Fronttalk ("ft") does not have the problem.
|
keesan
|
|
response 99 of 480:
|
Nov 28 18:36 UTC 2006 |
I just counted 90 From: Debora..... stock spams in my log file from procmail
in the past 1.5 days, up from 50/day last week to 60/day now. Please could
some staff member write up a script for people to easily use spamassassin
(spamc) even from bbs menu? Fat spams are also on the increase.
|