You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-155    
 
Author Message
25 new of 155 responses total.
jmsaul
response 75 of 155: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 01:17 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

jp2
response 76 of 155: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 02:09 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

rational
response 77 of 155: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 02:12 UTC 2004

 :)
jmsaul
response 78 of 155: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 02:28 UTC 2004

(Fixed dumb typo)

 In all of the verbiage and nastiness on both sides, Lynne's said one of the
 most valuable things I've ever read about BBSing:
 
    I have learned how to deal with unhealthy 
    types of social interaction. It's a skill. And one I happen to like 
    because it allows me to take more social risks than I might otherwise.
 
 You have four choices:
 
 1.  Leave
 2.  Close the BBS to "undesirables"
 3.  React to undesirable behavior with stress and hostility
 4.  Learn to deal with unhealthy types of social interaction in a healthy
        manner
 
 When I've said in the past that it's best to ignore system twits, I'm not
 saying that you should learn to like them.  They're going to be a part of
 Grex unless you shut the doors.  It's unavoidable -- you may manage to
 teach or bully or scold some into changing their behavior, but there will
 always be more.  It's up to you whether you continue to allow their
 presence to stress you out, or learn to handle them in a healthier way.
slynne
response 79 of 155: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 03:56 UTC 2004

Wow. Thanks Joe. I agree with everything you have said in resp:78
happyboy
response 80 of 155: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 07:33 UTC 2004

this discussion has gone on longer than is comfortable for me.


i hope i don't get a tummyache because of it.


                :(
cmcgee
response 81 of 155: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 12:50 UTC 2004

Go Joe!  Go Lynne!  Thanks for articulating why I'm staying.  I too wish I
could "kick out" the people I perceive as "ruining" Grex.  But I value Grex
more than I dislike them.  And I want other people to realize that there are
quite a few of us who want to be in a community where healthy interactions
are the -norm-.
iggy
response 82 of 155: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 14:29 UTC 2004

huh.. i didn't get the same thing out of slynne and jmsaul that
cmcgee appeared to.  i thought they were saying it is much healthier
to learn to deal with people rather than to kick everyone out so you can
have a private sanctuary.
jp2
response 83 of 155: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 14:41 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

remmers
response 84 of 155: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 16:51 UTC 2004

I didn't read cmcgee's "I too" as referring to slynne and jmsaul.

And *I too* applaud what they said.  :)
tod
response 85 of 155: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 17:51 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

keesan
response 86 of 155: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 18:04 UTC 2004

I have not kicked people out.  I use tools to avoid having to deal with the
messes they make, such as the ignore command, or fixseen when someone posts
all over agora or scribbles all over agora.  If everyone did this the vandals
might get bored and go away.  
jp2
response 87 of 155: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 18:09 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

albaugh
response 88 of 155: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 18:28 UTC 2004

All that is fine, but it isn't about changing *grex* in any way - it's about
people essentially developing thicker skins or the ilk.  And that isn't
something "grex" can do, other than perhaps posting a "warning" during
newuser or other places.  So, while people leaving grex because they were
stressed out over the item killing kaper may be unfortunate, unless grex is
to become a private members-only club where no mean / nasty people would ever
show up, those as bailed, well "sorry to see you go, but..."
tod
response 89 of 155: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 19:25 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

anderyn
response 90 of 155: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 19:39 UTC 2004

I think that a warning about this being the internet, etc. might be
appropriate. Seriously.
scott
response 91 of 155: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 19:40 UTC 2004

*I* can develop a thicker skin.  What about the jerks who are also driving
away new users, by entering abusive responses in party or Agora item 1?
iggy
response 92 of 155: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 19:53 UTC 2004

i highly doubt new users are helpless, defenseless little bunnies that need
someone charging in on a white horse and chainmail to protect them.
happyboy
response 93 of 155: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 19:57 UTC 2004

re91: i'll assume that you consider me to be one of *the jerks*

      who are the newusers who i have driven away?  i want names
     scott.  in fact i want names of any folks who have been
driven away by *the jerks*
keesan
response 94 of 155: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 20:46 UTC 2004

That is not the point.  If I were a potential user of grex, and the first and
probably only thing I saw here was name-calling, I would go away.
scott
response 95 of 155: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 21:11 UTC 2004

Re 93:  Easy enough.  I'm not calling you one of the
jerks-who-are-trying-to-drive-people-away.  I'm referring more to polytarp.

Although I'll certainly give you an honorary "jerk" for your pointless demand
for essentially uncollectable data.  ;)
albaugh
response 96 of 155: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 21:34 UTC 2004

I don't see any way that grex can remain "grex" and at the same time preclude
jerky users.
tod
response 97 of 155: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 21:57 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

krj
response 98 of 155: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 22:00 UTC 2004

"Grex: Where The Weak Are Killed and Eaten."
cyklone
response 99 of 155: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 22:13 UTC 2004

"Grex: Doing Personal Favors For Favored Persons"
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-155    
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss