|
Grex > Coop10 > #22: Motion to Restrict Non-Members to Sending Local E-Mail Only |  |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 164 responses total. |
senna
|
|
response 75 of 164:
|
Aug 5 07:54 UTC 1997 |
Too late, it's linked and there are going to be a whole bunch of forgets and
pipe interrupts.
|
aruba
|
|
response 76 of 164:
|
Aug 5 09:22 UTC 1997 |
So what. Big deal. Katie's policy is to honor any reasonable requests for
links to agora. I think it's a reasonable system.
|
bjorn
|
|
response 77 of 164:
|
Aug 5 11:30 UTC 1997 |
I'm not taking the time to read *all* of the 76 prior responses. I'll say
that I oppose this motion because if I had not had e-mail capabilities beyond
the confines of Grex, I never would have become a member, and I most assuredly
would have choosen a different server. There was a time when I (as vidar)
*only* used Grex for e-mail, because I didn't see any point in using its
other capabilities.
|
dadroc
|
|
response 78 of 164:
|
Aug 5 13:31 UTC 1997 |
If we got $6.00 from each E-Mail user for a year of use it would be
more than 84,000.00. Could we have a nice connection, computer and
furnature for that. Do not forget all of you would have better service
as part of the deal.
Free BBS was tried in the seventies, a nice idea but hard to support. Get real
and make Grex a pinch more commerical. Let the newbys find another way. The
true Grexer will find the system. After all, we are everywhere.
|
steve
|
|
response 79 of 164:
|
Aug 5 18:01 UTC 1997 |
But Grex *has* supported itself during its six year life. We haven't
done badly. In fact, the staff is struggling to 'keep up' on things,
like the Sun-4/670 that the Grex populace bought. We're doing OK.
Now, you are right that if every user paid up we'd have a lot more
money, but with a lot more money comes difficulties managing it, and
arguning over how to spend it, etc.
Right now, Grex is this unusual place where all sorts of things
are going on, running on a budget that is fantastically small. If
we had a budget of $84,000/yr, I'm not at all sure we wouldn't be
changed for the worse.
|
davel
|
|
response 80 of 164:
|
Aug 5 18:15 UTC 1997 |
$84,000 wouldn't actually go very far toward paying a staff to service Grex,
if we went that way.
|
richard
|
|
response 81 of 164:
|
Aug 5 21:43 UTC 1997 |
re: linking...why cant an item like this be linked to agora as
*read only*, with it plainly saying that you want to post in
this item you have to bring it up in coop. Is it possible for
an item to be linked as read-only in one or more confs without
freezing it in its conf of origination?
|
remmers
|
|
response 82 of 164:
|
Aug 5 22:46 UTC 1997 |
Nope.
|
hematite
|
|
response 83 of 164:
|
Aug 5 23:14 UTC 1997 |
I know, personally, if one has to pay to get email, I would stop
sending my yearly contributions. I'd lose a lot of friends that way whom
only have email on this system. I use grex for the confrences and party,
have my mail forwarded, but alot of my friends don't pay and I'd lose
friendships that way, and quite frankly, it would suck.
Also,(I don't know if anyone mentioned it) a lot of people don't have
money to spare(give, only $6.00 a month..), some kids here are paying for
college and car payments and barely making it.
Oh well, just my .02
|
kaplan
|
|
response 84 of 164:
|
Aug 5 23:38 UTC 1997 |
Re 80: That's a very important point.
My job is hotline tech support. As a helper on grex I do similar work.
Considering my salery and the number of calls I handle I'm worth over $6
per user question I answer. As long as I believe grex deserves my
support, it will continue to get my cash and time donations. If there
were enough member perks that it seemed like a business, I'd be less
likely to want to help.
Replacing the amout of time and skill I bring to grex would be really easy
compared to several people on and off staff. I bet we could spend the entire
$84,000 to hire a replacement for just one key staff member.
|
tpryan
|
|
response 85 of 164:
|
Aug 6 01:11 UTC 1997 |
sorry, I gave up read this *new* item after #34, so I will
ask also: In the week plus this has been discussed, has the
newuser program been updated (zero dollars, less than two hours
donated time)?
Has the mail machine been collected and assembled yet? Do
the townfolk have to mob the florist shop?
If just outbound E-mail from those logged in thru a telnet
port (*NOT* a dial-in or any sort) is restricted, I would find that
logical. Just send out a message, 'please use your ISP for outbound
E-mail' to those that log in from some place they DO pay money to
get service (or get it as a company/university perk).
I can agree that a *very good mission* of GREX (and even
M-net) is to provide an e-mail address and service to guests who
dial in. These just may be those without an Internet Service
Provider, the one's who would gain from sending out resume's by
e-mail and having a receving spot. These are the one who may
not have spent $2,000 to buy a machine so they can get free e-mail,
just so the sender does not have to spend 32 cents on the delivery.
(?Do you know it takes me less time to open and close my snail-mail
box than my e-mail box??).
Again apologies for not reading 35-84 if this problem
was solved since 7/31/1997.
|
steve
|
|
response 86 of 164:
|
Aug 6 04:10 UTC 1997 |
I'm collecting parts for the mail machine now. I still have
to enter an item in garage about it.
|
mta
|
|
response 87 of 164:
|
Aug 6 21:36 UTC 1997 |
There are a fair number of people who telnet here from public libraries,
university computer labs, and offices. Many of them don't have access
from there to any sort of e-mail. We'd be doing some of our poorest
"citizens" a disservice by restricting e-mail to those who dial in.
If e-mail has to be restricted in any way, I'd prefer to see it done
universally.
|
dpc
|
|
response 88 of 164:
|
Aug 7 01:29 UTC 1997 |
I like your suggestion in #85 *a lot*, Tim!
|
davel
|
|
response 89 of 164:
|
Aug 7 09:50 UTC 1997 |
Re 88: what Misti just said.
|
gull
|
|
response 90 of 164:
|
Aug 7 20:13 UTC 1997 |
When I first got on Grex, it was my only email access. I was connecting via
an anonymous terminal login on Michnet.
At least one friend of mine, until very recently, had no email access other
than Grex, at least no private email. It was either this or use his
parents' email account, with the obvious lack of privacy. Hotmail and such
only work if you have a web browser, and even then Grex is more stable than
most of those services.
I think Grex provides a valuable service with its free email, and one that's
getting hard to find. When was the last time you saw a machine with actual
shell access, that could be freely telnetted into?
|
snowth
|
|
response 91 of 164:
|
Aug 8 04:32 UTC 1997 |
I fit right in to the second paragraph of gull's response. And for me, it's
not so much a privacy issue, but that I can't get into my parents' email
without their password, which I'm not allowed to have. So then, in order to
send or recieve any email, I have to find a time when they're not busy, and
can run through and enter the password. It's a decided pain in the butt, and
I'd hate to see this proposal go through. If I become a member (which I'm
more then likely to do at some point...like when I actually have any money),
I don't want to do it knowing that I'm being motivated by whether or not I
get email.
|
remmers
|
|
response 92 of 164:
|
Aug 8 12:51 UTC 1997 |
I don't think the proposal is likely to go through, snowth. By
my count, at this point sentiment is running 3 in favor, 23
against.
|
dpc
|
|
response 93 of 164:
|
Aug 8 21:02 UTC 1997 |
I'm not ready to finalize the proposal yet. But, interestingly enough,
estimates of how the vote will go among the members are frequently *way*
off the mark. I've been repeatedly gulled into thinking something
will pass or fail because of posted comments, only to have the opposite
happen. So it goes.
|
valerie
|
|
response 94 of 164:
|
Aug 9 00:31 UTC 1997 |
This response has been erased.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 95 of 164:
|
Aug 9 15:45 UTC 1997 |
I'm joining this discussion kind of late, and haven't read the whole thing.
Forgive me if I'm repeating points already made, but...
There must be a better way of weeding out users who are using grex only for
free e-mail. I'm not a member of grex, and can't really afford to be one.
I spend most of my time in the conferences, but I have several friends who
my only communication with is via e-mail.
I agree with you that more members is a good thing, and that less of a load
on grex is a good thing, and that fewer non-participating users is a good
thing. I just think that this proposal would inconvenience a lot of other
people as well.
|
garima
|
|
response 96 of 164:
|
Aug 10 05:35 UTC 1997 |
Sorry for stupid questions - but how much is membership? Maybe I'll cough it
up
|
tsty
|
|
response 97 of 164:
|
Aug 10 06:06 UTC 1997 |
Thanks for asking about how to support Grex. Although you don't have to pay
to use Grex, our users pay all the bills. If the users don't support Grex,
it may go away.
The best way to support Grex is to become a member. Members get to:
- vote in Grex elections (if you've paid for three months or more)
- receive the 'Wizards In Training' Manual free (again with 3 months)
- use our Internet link (send a personal check or a copy of some ID)
Plus, you also get the warm and fuzzy feeling of having helped out a
valuable community resource.
Memberships cost $6/month or $60/year (US currency). Send cash, checks,
or money orders to:
Cyberspace Communications, Inc.
P.O. Box 4432
Ann Arbor, MI 48106-4432
Non-membership contributions are welcome, too. If you're interested in
making such a donation (monetary or otherwise), please send mail to aruba
for more info. THANKS!
|
aruba
|
|
response 98 of 164:
|
Aug 10 08:51 UTC 1997 |
You can also read Agora item 15, Garima, if you want a little more info.
|
moonowl
|
|
response 99 of 164:
|
Aug 10 09:12 UTC 1997 |
It has been so hard for me to get into grex as of late that I have gotten
another email address. That is in addition to sending in a three month
menbership to grex. I got another service for email and will use grex as a
confrencing bbs. Hopefully, I wouldn't have to wait a week to get back on,
as I tend to be off work at 5:00 am and it is quite busy here at that time,
or so it seems.
|