You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150    
 
Author Message
25 new of 150 responses total.
sholmes
response 75 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 5 14:26 UTC 2007

off topic but would it help if  staf mails the staff on other similar systems
like sdf etc and ask how they are tackling the spam problem?
kingjon
response 76 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 5 18:43 UTC 2007

erm ... If the user does not have the ability to send even local email, how is
he or she going to respond to the email asking how he or she found out about
Grex? (As specified as the method for validation.)
cmcgee
response 77 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 5 18:48 UTC 2007

Staff has a plan.  I'm not sure what it involves, but that was a
critical component in the way I wrote this.  

It is clear that vandals have made use of local email access, so there
really is no way to remain a good net citizen and allow that.  

If the staff plan doesn't work, we will then have to have an off-site
email address in order for the validation to occur.  

mcnally
response 78 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 5 19:24 UTC 2007

 Can I make what I hope is a fairly common-sense suggestion -- which is
 that you come up with whatever procedures, implement them in a kind of
 practice or test mode first (e.g. creation through a "newnewuser" 
 account creation process..), have some people try to use them, make sure
 the limitations work, make sure the "promotion" procedures work, etc..

 In other words, work all this out, including the procedures, using 
 volunteers first, and only THEN change newuser to make this the new 
 standard (assuming that this scheme is even approved in the first place.)
cross
response 79 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 5 19:26 UTC 2007

Sure, but we need to have the policy in place before we can do anything.
denise
response 80 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 5 20:01 UTC 2007

And how and when do we get to sign up those of us that want to be
helpers [and get the  basic 'training']?  Is this going to be discussed
at one of the upcoming board meetings?
cross
response 81 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 5 20:38 UTC 2007

Yes, I think we can certainly add an agenda item for the next board meeting
to formalize the process a bit more.
cmcgee
response 82 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 6 00:32 UTC 2007

McNally, unless staff can come up with a workable solution, we will have
exactly what is posted in this item:  A Grex where you cannot get social
validation without an offsite email address.  

I'm really really hoping staff can make that work.  But I'm not willing
to leave us in suspended animation any longer waiting for that to
happen.  

People are currently exploiting our openness to vandalize individuals,
Grex, and other systems.  We need to stop that.  
slynne
response 83 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 6 00:44 UTC 2007

I support bringing this to a vote
cross
response 84 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 6 21:04 UTC 2007

Folks, there's email, and there's Email.  We can certainly create some way
to send messages to someone that *look* like email, and to get a response
back.  Perhaps, ``cut and paste this into the grex terminal'' sorts of things
that run some kind of script.
gelinas
response 85 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 10 00:47 UTC 2007

This item was originally posted on August 6, 2007.  The final text was posted
on September 4, 2007.  By the end of September 6, 2007, 6 members had endorsed
bringing the proposal to a vote.  As of today, we have 56 members, so 6
members constitutes more than 10% of the membership.  

I've been asked to run the election.  Unfortunately, I don't have enough time
right now to set up the election.  I will make time to set it up tomorrow,
to run for 10 days.  The voting booth will open at or about 00:01, Tuesday,
September 11, 2007.
slynne
response 86 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 10 03:11 UTC 2007

Thanks Joe!
gelinas
response 87 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 11 02:34 UTC 2007

If I did everything correctly, the voting should start at midnight.  Both 
terminal and web access should work.  If not, someone who knows how should
give me a call, when the/a problem is discovered.
tsty
response 88 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 11 02:53 UTC 2007

waht about CURRENT well-knowns? or is this *solely* new loginids?
cmcgee
response 89 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 11 04:34 UTC 2007

The voting booth is available if you use www.cyberspace.org

For some reason www.grex.org shows me the older webpage.  Perhaps it's a
browser cache problem.

Telnetting in to vote does not work.  I've informed Gelinas of the
problem, and he will take care of it in the morning.
cmcgee
response 90 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 11 04:40 UTC 2007

TS, no one who currently has email access will lose it because of this
proposal.  

Logins that currently do not have email access will automatically be in
the User group, and will need to go through the process to be promoted
to the Community User group.  
cmcgee
response 91 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 11 04:45 UTC 2007

Yep, browser cache issue. Refreshing the page gave me access to the
voting booth.
remmers
response 92 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 11 15:54 UTC 2007

(Could I suggest making the voting booth link on the main page "secure"
(i.e. https) to that login and password won't be sent in the clear.)
remmers
response 93 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 11 15:55 UTC 2007

Also, the web voting form should contain the full wording of the proposal.
cmcgee
response 94 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 11 16:04 UTC 2007

John, has the complete voteadmin procedure been documented?  Apparently
what Joe has access to isn't easily understandable.
remmers
response 95 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 11 16:19 UTC 2007

Vote program installation and configuration is documented on the
"Grexdoc" CVS server; see e.g. ~remmers/grexdoc/vote/doc.  I guess
conventions of a non-technical nature like "what to put on the voting
form" aren't spelled out.  What I always did was to put the full wording
of the proposal and a link to the Coop discussion item.  Those can
easily be added by editing the relevant files that reside in the
/var/spool/vote directory.

denise
response 96 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 11 17:07 UTC 2007

I know this doesn't have to do with the voting but I'm not sure which
item  to ask in--and this is the closest one I see about members...  I
read  somewhere here [on one of the links or something?] that there is a
grex ' handbook'. Is that still around somewhere, and if so, how can I
get ahold  of one?  Thanks.
cross
response 97 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 11 18:17 UTC 2007

The voting programs were installed as per the grexdoc documentation (by me).
I think the questions are about the softer side of running a poll.
cross
response 98 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 11 21:58 UTC 2007

FYI, I don't think the vote is properly configured (or maybe I'm just
confused):

: grex 1169; vote

          *** Welcome to the Grex Voting Booth, cross! ***

Improper format in candlist
: grex 1170; 
gelinas
response 99 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 12 02:09 UTC 2007

cross, that is the problem cmcgee mentioned in *89 above.  It's fixed now.
I've also secured the web voting booth and added the full text of the
proposal, as suggested by remmers.  I'll add a link to the discussion
when I figure out "peek."
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150    
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss