You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-349   350-374   375-399   400-424   425-449 
 450-474   475-499   500-524   525-549   550-574   575-594     
 
Author Message
25 new of 594 responses total.
orinoco
response 75 of 594: Mark Unseen   Jul 1 15:05 UTC 2003

(psst... "cats and women")

jor -- yeah: got all four wisdom teeth out.
senna
response 76 of 594: Mark Unseen   Jul 1 21:05 UTC 2003

There's a difference between being healthily selective (which is undervalued)
and being excessively picky.  I know more than one person who disqualifies
every potential match on some grounds or another, and/or who sabotages those
relationships to keep them from working out.  Sometimes intentionally,
sometimes otherwise.

There is no sure-fire method--otherwise, people would be doing it.  All people
would be doing it.  There are, however, things to do that can help.
slynne
response 77 of 594: Mark Unseen   Jul 1 21:27 UTC 2003

I think it is easy to be critical about people being "overly picky". 
Let me ask you this, since you are about to get married. Are you in 
love with this woman who is your fiance? I would submit that most 
people who disqualify every potential match on some grounds or another 
probably are not really in love and are looking for a way out. In other 
words, they havent been lucky enoungh to find a person they could 
really fall in love with. If you didnt really love your fiance, would 
you stay with her or would you maybe start thinking of reasons to 
disqualify her? 

Of course, there are people who choose to be single but pretend to make 
an effort to be with someone because of societal pressures.  

And there are certainly things a person can do to improve the odds in 
the romantic relationship game. I dont dispute that at all. Let's face 
it, the Jennifer Anistons of the world have more options than the 
Roseanne Barrs. But, ultimately it still comes down to luck. 
tod
response 78 of 594: Mark Unseen   Jul 1 21:54 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

keesan
response 79 of 594: Mark Unseen   Jul 1 22:29 UTC 2003

How many people think you have to fall in love with someone to want to live
with them?  That seems like a pretty unrealistic requirement.
tod
response 80 of 594: Mark Unseen   Jul 1 23:11 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

richard
response 81 of 594: Mark Unseen   Jul 1 23:49 UTC 2003

IBB Katherine Hepburn died on Sunday.  Not only was she one of Hollywood's
greatest stars, but she was a feminist well before her time.  She was living
in sin with a married man, Spencer Tracy, for many years during a time when
such arrangements would have been scandalous.  She didn't care what other
people thought, she did her own thing.  Katherine Hepburn was cool.

Also liked the story that she won a record four best actress academy awards,
and never showed up to accept any of them.  When Hepburn won for "Lion in
Winter", a friend went and picked up her oscar at the ceremony.  She told him
to just drop by her house, put the statue in a paper bag, and stick it in a
cupboard.  Two decades later, this friend was visiting and remembered doing
that.  He looked in the cupboard and the oscar was still there, in the paper
bag.  Hepburn had never looked at it, much less had it engraved.  

She was one of a kind.  RIP
keesan
response 82 of 594: Mark Unseen   Jul 2 02:38 UTC 2003

re 81 - it is not about housemates.
senna
response 83 of 594: Mark Unseen   Jul 2 03:10 UTC 2003

I'm talking about people who disqualify peotential mates before it gets very
serious.  Of course, people don't always realize what's involved in committed
relationships.
anderyn
response 84 of 594: Mark Unseen   Jul 2 13:23 UTC 2003

Bummed because our office has had windows replaced and my allergies flared
up big time, so had to use personal time to book it out of there. And because
the cat is having a big "MEW MAMA FIX THINGS" breakdown, all night, every half
hour, she'd come in and MEW at me.
lynne
response 85 of 594: Mark Unseen   Jul 2 17:19 UTC 2003

Gahhh.  I have about 48 hours' worth of work to do in the next 24.  Also, 
my boss is a complete ass.  Just in case I haven't mentioned it before.
gregb
response 86 of 594: Mark Unseen   Jul 2 17:23 UTC 2003

And hope he/she doesn't doesn't Grex.

IBB I bought an SATA HD and didn't know it required a different power 
connection than that used with ATA drives.  So now I have a drive and 
no way to power it.  B-(
eskarina
response 87 of 594: Mark Unseen   Jul 2 21:20 UTC 2003

re 81:  I would argue that "living in sin" with a married man could/would and
perhaps should still be considered "scandalous", or at least wrong.

I've said it before, I'll say it again:  there's too much cheating in the
world today.
jazz
response 88 of 594: Mark Unseen   Jul 2 23:47 UTC 2003

        "Living in sin" is a nice concept if you subscribe to that particular
system of beliefs.  A lot of people don't.  But it doesn't imply adultery or
non-monogamy.
lynne
response 89 of 594: Mark Unseen   Jul 2 23:49 UTC 2003

Oh, I'm pretty sure he knows he's an ass.  And positive he doesn't grex.
IBB Richard misspelled "Katharine Hepburn".
richard
response 90 of 594: Mark Unseen   Jul 2 23:57 UTC 2003

#89...no I didn't...re-read my post, I spelled "katherine hepburn" 
correctly
richard
response 91 of 594: Mark Unseen   Jul 2 23:59 UTC 2003

richard's original post:

"IBB Katherine Hepburn died on Sunday.  Not only was she one of 
Hollywood's greatest stars, but she was a feminist well before her 
time.  She was living in sin with a married man, Spencer Tracy, for 
many years during a time when such arrangements would have been 
scandalous.  She didn't care what other people thought, she did her own 
thing.  Katherine Hepburn was cool.

Also liked the story that she won a record four best actress academy 
awards,and never showed up to accept any of them.  When Hepburn won 
for "Lion in Winter", a friend went and picked up her oscar at the 
ceremony.  She told him to just drop by her house, put the statue in a 
paper bag, and stick it in a cupboard.  Two decades later, this friend 
was visiting and remembered doing that.  He looked in the cupboard and 
the oscar was still there, in the paper bag.  Hepburn had never looked 
at it, much less had it engraved.  

She was one of a kind.  RIP"

don't see any misspelled katherine hepburns...

keesan
response 92 of 594: Mark Unseen   Jul 3 00:06 UTC 2003

Katharine vs Katherine (a - e)

If she was living with a married man, he was probably not also living with
his wife, meaning they were at least physically separated but not divorced.
Divorce used to be more difficult.
richard
response 93 of 594: Mark Unseen   Jul 3 00:07 UTC 2003

okay I did a google search, and its spelled both ways in numerous places. they
are both correct spellings 
jaklumen
response 94 of 594: Mark Unseen   Jul 3 00:42 UTC 2003

my 13 mo. old daughter is cutting her first molars and a canine, and 
it's just knocking her out.  Poor little Sarah.
richard
response 95 of 594: Mark Unseen   Jul 3 01:21 UTC 2003

IBB famed children's author Robert McCloskey died today at age 88.
McCloskey was the author of one of my alltime favorite books when I was
little, "Make Way for Ducklings"  I love that book.  In fact I gave a
copy of it to my little niece not too long ago.

RIP
gelinas
response 96 of 594: Mark Unseen   Jul 3 02:44 UTC 2003

(While there are many spellings of the name, each holder usually uses only
one spelling.  Using a different spelling is incorrect.  I don't know how Ms.
Hepburn spelled her name.)
tod
response 97 of 594: Mark Unseen   Jul 3 04:31 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

remmers
response 98 of 594: Mark Unseen   Jul 3 13:38 UTC 2003

(FWIW, it's spelled "Katharine" in her New York Times obit and everywhere
on IMDB.  I think we can assume that this spelling is correct and others
are not.)
tod
response 99 of 594: Mark Unseen   Jul 3 15:56 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-349   350-374   375-399   400-424   425-449 
 450-474   475-499   500-524   525-549   550-574   575-594     
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss