|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 99 responses total. |
lumen
|
|
response 75 of 99:
|
Dec 12 07:49 UTC 1997 |
Definitely something to think about. But punk has never *ever* been attached
to any sort of black music. That's where epithets like 'gangsta' and
'criminal' come in.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 76 of 99:
|
Dec 12 23:21 UTC 1997 |
Well, there's been rap that comes fairly close to punk, and much punk/ska also
uses bits of rap. The difference is that gangsta rap actually tends to be
fairly heavily produced, and not very punk-ish to my ears.
|
lumen
|
|
response 77 of 99:
|
Dec 13 09:17 UTC 1997 |
Right on the mark, as usual.
|
raven
|
|
response 78 of 99:
|
Dec 13 15:15 UTC 1997 |
re #75 Not true! The Bad Brains did punk reggae back in the early 80s.
Fishbone did punk ska/funk in the mid 80s and they are still making
music. X-Ray Spex one of the original British punk bands had black
members.
As to the earlier thread I would argue that punk is not a style of music
or a way of dressing it is the do it yourself attitude. Thus I would say
must of the true punks today would not be doing what is commonly thought
of as punk music but more something like free jazz world culture influenced
music like you might here from Morsel or some of the bands from Community
High like Poignt Plectrostomos.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 79 of 99:
|
Dec 14 04:04 UTC 1997 |
See, I wouldn't call Plecostomus a punk band, but I suppose their audience
tends to have a punk feel to it...
|
goose
|
|
response 80 of 99:
|
Dec 14 06:22 UTC 1997 |
But a band like PP or Morsel is quite punk in their ideals, maybe not
so much in their sound.
|
agent86
|
|
response 81 of 99:
|
Dec 27 07:35 UTC 1997 |
Ok, has anyone ever heard anything by Atari Teenage Riot? (Or for that matter
anything on the DHR label, relating to Alec Empire?)
They are pretty interesting in that they sound _very_ punk (both in terms of
instrumentals and lyrical content), but that they try to dissasociate
themselves with "punk" music. They have said in interviews that they feel
punk, rap, techno, and 'electronica' are all soft musical styles. I suppose
ATR does have a progressive sound, but they _if they wanted to_ could be
termed punk. Given this, and interesting question would be: how may bands that
_appear_ punk actually want to _be_ punk, or would claim to be?
IF you haven't heard any ATR, let me just say it sounds like punk or
speedmetal with plenty of samples thrown in and techno effect like
phasers/flanges. It's lyrical content is anarcho-political. Even if you don't
like their music, they are pretty consistently fairly progressive -- to the
point that listening to them is a good way to figure out what music is gonna
do in the next couple of years.
There are realaudio samples of their music on the web at
http://www.soundz.com/feature/sndzite/atr/
(Honest to god, I am not a promoter or ATR or an employee of Digital Hardcore
Recording, INC. ;)
|
orinoco
|
|
response 82 of 99:
|
Dec 28 03:11 UTC 1997 |
Intriguing...no, I've never heard of them, but you've piqued my curiousity.
|
lumen
|
|
response 83 of 99:
|
Dec 28 09:54 UTC 1997 |
Anarchy. Highly overrated. But the instrumental content sounds very
fascinating.
|
hardcore
|
|
response 84 of 99:
|
Apr 6 00:41 UTC 1998 |
I have been surprised to see almost no modern bands that are actually punk
mentioned here. Punk is most definately not dead, as is made obvious by the
popularity of bands like Avail and there are quite a few bands here in
Indianapolis like Illithed. Punk can not be popular in the mainstream, simply
because of the fundamental basis of punk. If it is the majority, then it
certainly isn't punk. Personally, I am not into punk, I strongly disagree with
the self destructive attitude of the whole scene. But punk lives in many forms
other than just punk. THere have been several music styles to come from punk,
the most positive, and in my opinion the best style of music there is, is
hardcore. I could go into the entire history of hardcore from the Teen Idles
to Minor Threat to Earth Crisis, but I think this already long enough. If
anyone wants to know more, e-mail me.
|
cyklone
|
|
response 85 of 99:
|
Apr 7 00:46 UTC 1998 |
Here's a question I've always wanted answered: What's the difference between
punk and hardcore?
|
lumen
|
|
response 86 of 99:
|
Apr 9 23:03 UTC 1998 |
Here we go again. :) Someone may have to define punk a bit more tightly now..
|
raven
|
|
response 87 of 99:
|
Apr 19 02:22 UTC 1998 |
I still say punk is not a style of music but the DIY sttitude. IMO Balkan
brass band music from the ruins of sravejo is far punker than some suburban
kids playing bad 3 chord music full of trite cliches about anarchy.
|
morpheus
|
|
response 88 of 99:
|
May 2 19:03 UTC 1998 |
I agree that kids playing music in sarjevo (agh, my spelling is fuct) probably
have a more diy attitude -- but the music doesn't reflect it. I don't think
any music form that originated with a 50 year old american musical style and
was subsequently processed through a foreign culture can be "punk" for the
simple reason that the music doesn't sound punk, and the message promoted by
the music (though perhaps not by the musicians) is nothing like "punk" music.
This is a discussion of music, not musicians (if you can seperate the two,
that is).
|
raven
|
|
response 89 of 99:
|
May 3 16:54 UTC 1998 |
The muscian is the music.
|
krj
|
|
response 90 of 99:
|
May 4 17:28 UTC 1998 |
Isn't punk itself a 20-year-old style?
|
raven
|
|
response 91 of 99:
|
May 4 21:03 UTC 1998 |
Punks not dead it's just fat bald & old. Ask Johnny Rotten...
|
lumen
|
|
response 92 of 99:
|
May 6 01:00 UTC 1998 |
Still, we've been debating what punk music actually *is*. If that logic is
true, then punk has to change itself to a new incantation just to keep a
rebellious low-profile.
|
raven
|
|
response 93 of 99:
|
May 7 02:09 UTC 1998 |
re # 92 I agree the true spirit of punk is to not be static musically. For
an example of evolved punk check the local band Poignt Plecstrostomos.
They play fast klezmer, Irish improve in strange time sigantures, now that
we are in the information age poential punks have access to many more
musical genres than the origal punks probably listened to in the 70s.
|
morpheus
|
|
response 94 of 99:
|
May 7 04:06 UTC 1998 |
Hmm... I met them when they played at the gypsy caffe (on 4th st, i think)
a couple months back... they are really progressive musically. I like them
a lot.
Anyways, I asked the guys who I was sitting with before the show if it could
be called punk music. Judging by the answer I got ("Yeah, right, its hardcore
punk, in fact they will be shooting up heroine in the middle of a violin
solo") they don't think so, and their audience doesn't think so. It sounded
as if they don't want to be associated with "punk" music at all.
On the other hand, perhaps the musician is qualified to do anything except
create music, and judge whether or not not music is "good."
Perhaps a way to help answer the question "what is punk?" would be to decide
what *bands* are "punk." For instance, are the bands on the Epitath label,
such as Pennywise (one of my favorite groups), NOFX, Operation Ivy, Rancid,
and Millencolin punk? Why or why not?
|
cyklone
|
|
response 95 of 99:
|
May 7 12:50 UTC 1998 |
PP is *not* punk. Playing in odd meters just for the sake of showing you can
do it is the absolute antithesis of punk.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 96 of 99:
|
May 7 16:09 UTC 1998 |
I thought Lawrence Welk was the *absolute* antithesis of punk..
|
lumen
|
|
response 97 of 99:
|
May 7 22:33 UTC 1998 |
re #95: why so?
|
cyklone
|
|
response 98 of 99:
|
May 8 13:07 UTC 1998 |
Punk is based on emotion, usually anger. It was/is a reaction to
over-blown attitudes that permeate much music, such as the bombastic
ending, the over-done dynamic, the overly-complex arrangement. Most
odd-metered songs lack the visceral quality needed for punk. If I were to
make a comparison of A2 bands, I would suggest that Morsel, which also
uses odd meters, is more "punk" than PP, since the meter of their songs,
at least sometimes, seems to be used as vehicle to further the emotional
impact of the song, rather than an exercise in cleverness.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 99 of 99:
|
May 9 02:55 UTC 1998 |
Erm, Plecostomus seems plenty "visceral", if I'm understanding the word right.
They are kind of alcking in anger or angst, tho...
erm, lacking.
|