|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 4 new of 78 responses total. |
mcnally
|
|
response 75 of 78:
| 
Nov 24 17:19 UTC 1998 |
I agree that many of the porn sites are sleazy and attempt to
attract viewers by deliberately deceptive measures.
However, this legislation affects more than just straightforward
for-profit porn sites.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 76 of 78:
|
Nov 24 19:41 UTC 1998 |
There would not be agreement on which sites are .sex and which are not.
I presume any site concerning sex medically, pop-medically, or
pseudo-medically, or..??.. would not be .sex?
|
bru
|
|
response 77 of 78:
|
Dec 2 09:00 UTC 1998 |
probably not. medical facilities and educational institutions usually fall
under .org or .edu anyway
|
remmers
|
|
response 78 of 78:
|
Dec 2 14:08 UTC 1998 |
So under this bill, would it be legal for a site run by a non-profit to
publicly post sexually explicit material and make it freely available to
all regardless of age?
|
