You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-98       
 
Author Message
24 new of 98 responses total.
aaron
response 75 of 98: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 09:41 UTC 2001

If the agreement is not specifically referenced, that may be a means to
avoid the terms of that specific supplemental agreement.
aruba
response 76 of 98: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 14:43 UTC 2001

Hmmm.  Thanks Aaron.  I'm on the fence about whether it's worth trying to
break the contract, or whether we should just pay the $35/month and get
out August 4th.  I guess we should discuss it at the board meeting.  If we
decide to try to break the contract, I don't really want to be the point
person who calls and explains that to them.  So going that route is
contingent on someone else volunteering to do that bit of dirty work.
keesan
response 77 of 98: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 19:16 UTC 2001

Mary did a really good job with the landlord - might she be willing to make
a tactful phone call (and maybe mention that our member who is a lawyer
thought the contract might not be valid anyway?).
other
response 78 of 98: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 22:03 UTC 2001

Tact might be a useful first approach on this, but I suspect that this 
may take the raising of a bitchstorm.
aaron
response 79 of 98: Mark Unseen   Feb 28 16:04 UTC 2001

You have to be careful about bringing lawyers into the picture, as some 
organizations will immediately transfer a matter to the legal department
 as soon as they hear the word "lawyer."
aruba
response 80 of 98: Mark Unseen   Feb 28 16:24 UTC 2001

Good point.
dpc
response 81 of 98: Mark Unseen   Mar 6 21:45 UTC 2001

Are we still paying these people anything?  We shouldn't.
I really doubt if they will try to enforce such a contract
by suing *us*.  Or don't I understand the situation?   8)
aruba
response 82 of 98: Mark Unseen   Mar 6 21:57 UTC 2001

We are paying CardService International $35/month.  At the board meeting we
designated scott to call them and try to get us out of the contract - he
said he will get to that later this week.
scott
response 83 of 98: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 20:10 UTC 2001

I made the call today.

Well, they're pretty well used to fielding questions on this situation, and
not very flexible sounding.  :(   Possibly somebody better at than me at this
could have made some headway, but it didn't sound promising, since the first
guy I talked to made it sound like this was item #1 on the FAQ they read from.

Anyway, here's what I did collect:
To cancel the account, we need to send the letter including:
Merchant #
Business name
Reason for closing ("not feasible to use" would be OK; I asked and this
wasn't any trick question we had to answer exactly).
Signature of person who originally opened account (I spent a couple minutes
on this one, since what if that person(s) had left the company?).  aruba or
remmers could sign this.
Date account is to be closed:  August 3, 2001 (mandatory).

Letter should be mailed to:
Card Service International
Merchant Operations Department
Attn: Account Closures
P.O. Box 5180
Simi Valley, CA 93062-5180

We can also fax it to (805) 552-8453, Attn: Account Closures as well as
mailing it (we can do both, to be on the safe side).  

We should mail/fax on May 5 (earliest date of window), and after a month
follow up if we haven't gotten confirmation.  

Sorry I couldn't come up with better results; I didn't feel like I had
anything for leverage other than "some of people thought it sounded a bit
sleazy to set things up this way".  I'm usually pretty good at getting tech
support results, but that's when I've got a solid issue to work with.  :(
dpc
response 84 of 98: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 20:35 UTC 2001

I suggest sending the letter, and not paying them anything more.
aruba
response 85 of 98: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 22:33 UTC 2001

Dave - they are taking money directly out of our checking account, so
stopping payment is not as simple as not sending a check.
jiffer
response 86 of 98: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 22:35 UTC 2001

We can also fax the letter. I think faxing and mailing it is a safe 
option.  Also, I have access to a fax machine that gives a report 
showing supposedly the time, date and page count that was faxed.

scg
response 87 of 98: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 22:54 UTC 2001

Presumably we can ask the bank not to pay the money they're taking out of the
account.  The question, I suppose, is whether Cyberspace Communications'
credit would suffer as a result.
flem
response 88 of 98: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 23:08 UTC 2001

The text of the agreement that Mark quoted would seem to indicate that if we
asked the bank not to pay them, that would constitute an early termination
of the contract, whereupon we'd have to pay the early cncellation fee.  
mary
response 89 of 98: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 23:38 UTC 2001

I think we should eat this one and consider it a good lesson.
scg
response 90 of 98: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 02:04 UTC 2001

In this sort of dispute, tehre's a point at which teh party having the money
has control, because it's not a large enough amount to be worth suing over.
I suspect if we really wanted to dispute this we could.  Maybe we don't want
to deal with it, though.
aruba
response 91 of 98: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 15:28 UTC 2001

I checked our contract with Card Service, and it makes it clear that remmers
and I are personal guarantors of Grex's account.  That gives CSI the right
to go after us if Grex breaks the contract.

Needless to say, this makes me less than keen on trying to unilaterally end
our contract.
remmers
response 92 of 98: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 16:05 UTC 2001

Indeed.
eeyore
response 93 of 98: Mark Unseen   Mar 9 01:28 UTC 2001

I can understand that.

At this point I'd have to say that we just realize that we messed up, and deal
with the consequences.  I'm sure that we'll be okay. :)
scott
response 94 of 98: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 03:22 UTC 2001

Ditto.  It would be nice to get out of this without paying anything more, but
I'm *very* reluctant to put aruba or remmers on the spot.
other
response 95 of 98: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 04:34 UTC 2001

Agreed
eeyore
response 96 of 98: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 06:10 UTC 2001

Exactly.  It's not *their* fault that Card Services are a bunch of
muttonheads!
dpc
response 97 of 98: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 21:26 UTC 2001

S/he who gives a personal guarantee commits suicide by fountain pen. 8-)
aruba
response 98 of 98: Mark Unseen   Mar 13 00:16 UTC 2001

Well, someone had to do it.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-98       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss