|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 19 new of 93 responses total. |
lilmo
|
|
response 75 of 93:
| 
Nov 11 03:35 UTC 1997 |
THANK YOU MARCUS !!!!! I wasn't even here at the time, but I've been here
before, and I know you put in loads of time for us, as does the rest of the
Grex staff.
How about we start an item for "I remmeber when mdw fixed ..." and delete this
friggin' item, eh?
|
tsty
|
|
response 76 of 93:
|
Nov 21 04:29 UTC 1997 |
i'm not sure we have enough disk space for lists like that <g!>!
|
mta
|
|
response 77 of 93:
|
Nov 22 08:13 UTC 1997 |
You're mot certainly right, TS. Especially for Marcus -- but any staffer who
has been around a while.
|
davel
|
|
response 78 of 93:
|
Nov 22 14:22 UTC 1997 |
Well, a somewhat censored version of some of the staff cf "what I did" items
would make a good start at it. It would be interesting to have them posted
somewhere public.
|
valerie
|
|
response 79 of 93:
|
Nov 22 22:39 UTC 1997 |
This response has been erased.
|
davel
|
|
response 80 of 93:
|
Nov 24 01:35 UTC 1997 |
(Warning: I said it would be interesting to have them posted, not that they'd
make really exciting reading. "Removed user moo45 at user's request. Sent
mail to xyz54 to about mail abuse". An awful lot of it is routine stuff like
that, unless something has changed.)
|
remmers
|
|
response 81 of 93:
|
Nov 24 02:24 UTC 1997 |
(That last example raises another point: Unless someone does a
*lot* of censoring, making the "What I Did" item public would
publicize the login id's of a lot of people who have --
inadvertently or otherwise -- abused Grex resources. Do folks
think that would be appropriate?)
|
janc
|
|
response 82 of 93:
|
Nov 24 03:38 UTC 1997 |
I would censor most user logins out of it. A bother to do on a regular
basis, but it would be nice to post some samples.
|
aruba
|
|
response 83 of 93:
|
Nov 24 05:38 UTC 1997 |
Yeah, I agree with Jan.
|
valerie
|
|
response 84 of 93:
|
Nov 24 19:14 UTC 1997 |
This response has been erased.
|
dpc
|
|
response 85 of 93:
|
Nov 24 23:51 UTC 1997 |
Good idea.
|
tsty
|
|
response 86 of 93:
|
Nov 25 00:12 UTC 1997 |
changing them all to zzzzzzzzzz would have it's merits also, given
the prosaic nature of a majorrity of the scut work y'all have
to do.
i'm not all that fired up about the 'what i did' item becoming
and edited public document. editors goof, most of it is drudgery
(williingly accepted by our *volunteers), some it it involves
un-doing and/or re-doing something to finalize the goal. and
perhaps re-dooing 'it' again...to get it right.
that sorty of publicity would unleassh the pit-nickers, slit-shingers,
and 20-20 hind-sighters for a ribald romp .. adn the only
defense would be to *not* do anything (or keep it secret)
and tell them to fsck-off.
no, imo, this publicity is not in the better interests of grex.
some recent item bythe pseudo 'seeker' bursts to the fore.
|
aruba
|
|
response 87 of 93:
|
Nov 25 06:28 UTC 1997 |
Until I read the "What I did" item I had no idea just how much the staff does.
I think it's quite appropriate to share that sense of respect I obtained with
all Grexers.
|
remmers
|
|
response 88 of 93:
|
Nov 25 10:51 UTC 1997 |
I think it would be useful to post it also. It can't hurt for
people to have a better sense of what the staff does.
|
mta
|
|
response 89 of 93:
|
Nov 25 16:29 UTC 1997 |
TS may well have a point in that *some* people will have a negative reaction
-- but TS, I think they're in the minority. For the most part I think people
will be either bored by it or started by the amount and dreariness of it.
It will certainly clear up the misconception that being on staff is somehow
"glamourous". ;)
|
valerie
|
|
response 90 of 93:
|
Nov 25 23:19 UTC 1997 |
This response has been erased.
|
lilmo
|
|
response 91 of 93:
|
Nov 25 23:34 UTC 1997 |
This idea has taken on a life of its own, and I will *not* be held responsible
for the consequences !! :-)
I was thinking more of something that was not a behind-the-scenes look, full
of praise for staff to offset all the items wherein complaints are made about
staff. What you suggest would also serve a purpose, and a good one, but
nonetheless, a different one.
|
valerie
|
|
response 92 of 93:
|
Dec 3 17:00 UTC 1997 |
This response has been erased.
|
lilmo
|
|
response 93 of 93:
|
Dec 17 02:42 UTC 1997 |
Cool! I've said it before (tonight, even!), and I'll say it again: Yea,
staff!
|