|
Grex > Agora47 > #162: New Hampshire Supreme Court: Gay Sex Not Adultery | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 14 new of 88 responses total. |
mary
|
|
response 75 of 88:
|
Nov 23 17:31 UTC 2003 |
There have been some horrible accidents
involving MRI scanners, and stray metal
either in the room, fragments in the patient,
or even undiscolsed older implants.
The last one I heard about involved a
young boy who was emergently sent to MRI
and in the rush to get him scanned nobody
realized a portable O2 tank had been brought
in and was parked in a corner. During the
scan it was sucked into the MRI tube and the
boy's head was crushed.
|
other
|
|
response 76 of 88:
|
Nov 23 20:19 UTC 2003 |
ouch
|
tpryan
|
|
response 77 of 88:
|
Nov 23 20:55 UTC 2003 |
Sounds like bad design of room/rooms.
|
goose
|
|
response 78 of 88:
|
Nov 24 14:55 UTC 2003 |
And this is why malpractice insurance is so expensive....;-)
|
willcome
|
|
response 79 of 88:
|
Nov 24 19:12 UTC 2003 |
whores?
|
gull
|
|
response 80 of 88:
|
Nov 25 17:12 UTC 2003 |
Re #56: It probably has more than a little to do with the fact that drug
company profit margins are some of the highest in existance.
Re #66: My personal experience is different. My employer cut back on
health care benefits and I didn't get any increase in salary. In fact
no one has had a raise in two years. Maybe it's 'cause I'm not union.
Re #68: Most grades of stainless steel are not attracted to magnets.
|
klg
|
|
response 81 of 88:
|
Nov 25 17:52 UTC 2003 |
re: "Re #66: My personal experience is different. My employer cut
back on health care benefits and I didn't get any increase in salary."
This is not evidence that the labor cost, in total, was reduced. It
may, in fact, have increased.
|
gull
|
|
response 82 of 88:
|
Nov 25 18:05 UTC 2003 |
I suppose. Still, I have my doubts. Salaries are set by competition on
the labor market, so just because an employer saves money doesn't mean
they'll pass that along as higher salaries. Unless the labor market is
tight they'll probably just pocket it.
|
klg
|
|
response 83 of 88:
|
Nov 25 21:02 UTC 2003 |
(Salaries/wages AND benefits - i.e., total labor costs - are set by
competition??)
|
gull
|
|
response 84 of 88:
|
Nov 25 22:02 UTC 2003 |
That may be, but salary is what's usually advertised.
|
klg
|
|
response 85 of 88:
|
Nov 26 03:34 UTC 2003 |
(It is????? We generally see benefits listed, but no salary level.)
|
gull
|
|
response 86 of 88:
|
Nov 26 14:35 UTC 2003 |
I see benefits listed for things like government jobs, where the salary
is almost always lower than an equivalent private sector job, in an
attempt to make the job seem more attractive. I don't think I've seen
benefits listed on a regular basis for private sector jobs.
|
willcome
|
|
response 87 of 88:
|
Nov 27 09:34 UTC 2003 |
I think we should have SOCIALISED WHORERY!
|
gull
|
|
response 88 of 88:
|
Nov 28 14:59 UTC 2003 |
Do you find that the private sector is not delivering whores of
sufficient quality?
|