You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   47-71   72-88       
 
Author Message
17 new of 88 responses total.
twenex
response 72 of 88: Mark Unseen   Nov 28 22:06 UTC 2005

#67 is pissy?
naftee
response 73 of 88: Mark Unseen   Nov 28 23:17 UTC 2005

Yeah.
tod
response 74 of 88: Mark Unseen   Nov 29 10:39 UTC 2005

re #71
Praise for?
tsty
response 75 of 88: Mark Unseen   Nov 30 15:46 UTC 2005

in the minutes of this borg meeting .. where was the Q & A about 'were
teh monthly backups accomplished?'
  
borg abdicating knowlege of the necessity of such a confirmation
in the face of *such* a huge,  imminent danger action to be attempted
in teh very near future demonstrates a pathetically rudderless 
insiders-cabal. where was teh oversight? 
mary
response 76 of 88: Mark Unseen   Nov 30 15:58 UTC 2005

I think we should consider going to a for-pay, professionally hosted Grex 
system, where all of the money that comes in goes to the company that 
keeps the hardware and software running.  Of course, we'd lose dial-in 
capability and access to the shell and party, but we wouldn't be dependent 
on the kindness of volunteers.  

Lots of communities thrive on such platforms. 
mary
response 77 of 88: Mark Unseen   Nov 30 16:04 UTC 2005

I don't think we're there yet.  But I see it coming.  And insisting the 
board rule the staff, dictating they do more, better, and now, is a great 
catalyst to that environment.
bhoward
response 78 of 88: Mark Unseen   Nov 30 16:28 UTC 2005

Re#75 Board policy generally defers to staff on most technical
issues except where those involving significant cost or steps into
policy issues.

It was, in fact, confirmed that a backup was taking place before
the start of the upgrade.  I know because I asked the question
myself during the meeting. This is not a question of inadequate
oversight.  The system was for the most part backed up.  The
backup for the mail spool failed due to a simple mistake that
could have happened to anyone.
ric
response 79 of 88: Mark Unseen   Nov 30 17:01 UTC 2005

re 76 - then grex becomes just another web site.

The shell and the party attract new users, not the BBS.  Some of those shell
and party users find their way to BBS, but new people don't generally just
wander into the grex BBS.
eprom
response 80 of 88: Mark Unseen   Nov 30 19:47 UTC 2005

when do the minutes get posted?
keesan
response 81 of 88: Mark Unseen   Nov 30 20:24 UTC 2005

Re 79, we started on grex because of free dial-in email, then I got curious
about the bbs and Jim started playing with the shell account programs.
remmers
response 82 of 88: Mark Unseen   Nov 30 20:47 UTC 2005

Re #80:  The last board meeting was November 10.  No minutes yet. 
They're usually posted sooner than this.
ric
response 83 of 88: Mark Unseen   Dec 1 20:27 UTC 2005

re 81 - If you were trying to refute my point, you failed.  "email" qualifies
under the "shell" access.  In grexes case, it's not that different from having
access to a C compiler.  Just another unix program/service that is part of
pretty much every unix system out there.
tod
response 84 of 88: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 22:39 UTC 2005

re #76
That was tried before..it was called ARBORNET.  Remember?
ric
response 85 of 88: Mark Unseen   Dec 6 14:58 UTC 2005

hah
tsty
response 86 of 88: Mark Unseen   Jan 14 07:14 UTC 2006

btw, how is teh atempt at restoring from those old 8mm tapes steve
was talking about in another item? mcnally and i are not the only ones
who could use some retrieval ... even if it is imcomplete (up to date) but
more importnatly, ancient/archival.
  
jesuit
response 87 of 88: Mark Unseen   May 17 02:15 UTC 2006

TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE
tsty
response 88 of 88: Mark Unseen   May 19 19:28 UTC 2006

aside from the 'newness' [[g]] caused by 'dork,' ... what about
those 8 mm tapes ?????
  
please see #86 and previous
 0-24   25-49   47-71   72-88       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss