|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 95 responses total. |
kip
|
|
response 71 of 95:
| 
Mar 13 16:41 UTC 2004 |
Oh I'm sorry Tod, I should have said my poor attempt as analogy. I certainly
have tried the diplomatic approach in saying "Your jumping up and down here
at the outdoor concert isn't adding to the event, would you please consider
some other method of interaction." It rarely works. I still try every now
and then. It usually degenerates into "How about I just jump up and down in
front of you a little bit to get your attention. Or maybe this little bit.
You can see over me anyway, if you can just manage to ignore me, but you
won't."
And would salad like to suggest what else besides attention one might want?
|
salad
|
|
response 72 of 95:
|
Mar 13 19:48 UTC 2004 |
Sure, maybe some of us try to have fun around here a little bit? Or is that
completely illegal?
|
anderyn
|
|
response 73 of 95:
|
Mar 13 20:30 UTC 2004 |
Why is being a pain in the butt fun
|
salad
|
|
response 74 of 95:
|
Mar 14 02:08 UTC 2004 |
You SERIOUSLy think some of those extremely silly all-caps responses are THAT
annoying? If you read some you might actually think they are funny. I'm
serious.
|
anderyn
|
|
response 75 of 95:
|
Mar 14 05:16 UTC 2004 |
I read them, I don't particularly think they are fun ny. Apparently my funny
bone only works on certain things (like Terry Pratchett ...)
|
twenex
|
|
response 76 of 95:
|
Mar 14 13:42 UTC 2004 |
I could have written that (if there had been more typos).
|
salad
|
|
response 77 of 95:
|
Mar 14 16:40 UTC 2004 |
re 75 C'mon, I can't be THAT bad..
|
md
|
|
response 78 of 95:
|
Mar 14 16:48 UTC 2004 |
The caps posts are kinda boring in themselves (sorry, kids). What I
like about them is the way the capsters don't realize that I read them
to *my* background music, not theirs. AHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAHAAA!! That
applies to lots of posts, though, including mine.
|
twenex
|
|
response 79 of 95:
|
Mar 14 16:50 UTC 2004 |
Mm, aren't you ignoring your own advice?
|
atlantic
|
|
response 80 of 95:
|
Mar 14 16:54 UTC 2004 |
The caps posts are great. I invented them.
|
salad
|
|
response 81 of 95:
|
Mar 14 17:08 UTC 2004 |
AHAHAHAH No you didn't
|
atlantic
|
|
response 82 of 95:
|
Mar 14 17:10 UTC 2004 |
I did.
|
md
|
|
response 83 of 95:
|
Mar 14 17:24 UTC 2004 |
Re 79: I gots no problem with them, although if the Grex box were
sitting on *my* desk I admit I might want to permanently disconnect
them from it, too. Whatever.
|
salad
|
|
response 84 of 95:
|
Mar 14 18:17 UTC 2004 |
re 82 No, you didn't.
|
mary
|
|
response 85 of 95:
|
Mar 14 19:48 UTC 2004 |
Here is an update on my twit-filtering experience.
I'm a much happier Grexer. Such a little change but the benefit seems
enormous. Mostly, I feel I'm doing what I can to totally ignore those
needing attention with twitish behavior. It's kind like this, if a twit
screamed in a forest, and nobody was there to hear it, would his 15
minutes would be over. Fusion philosophy, 101. ;-)
I do wish such a thing were available for Backtalk users. I also
wish it was a little easier to edit the twit list.
But if you're someone who simply must respond, just one last time,
thinking this time for sure what you'll say will make a difference...
Consider letting it roll by unseen. Have that be your statement.
|
atlantic
|
|
response 86 of 95:
|
Mar 14 19:53 UTC 2004 |
Backtalk does have such a feature, you tit.
|
md
|
|
response 87 of 95:
|
Mar 15 01:18 UTC 2004 |
What atlantic said, or would have said if he'd been a good person,
was: "But Mary, BackTalk does have such a feature. Furthermore, you
should see how nice the item lists in Agora and Coop look after you've
done a mass 'forget' on all the items by jp2, polytarp and all their
pseudos."
|
anderyn
|
|
response 88 of 95:
|
Mar 15 04:03 UTC 2004 |
I feel so much happier now.
|
salad
|
|
response 89 of 95:
|
Mar 15 04:53 UTC 2004 |
You feel like happy tits, eh?
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 90 of 95:
|
Mar 15 08:42 UTC 2004 |
resp:70 Of course. I just wasn't around long enough, I guess, to know
deja had been obnoxious. I experienced M-net party, but that was about
it. The e-mail was just some sort of generic welcome, I think. I
totally wasn't expecting it and I guess that's why I remembered it
some. But it was so long ago that I have no real idea what it said
specifically.
|
tod
|
|
response 91 of 95:
|
Mar 15 16:07 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
md
|
|
response 92 of 95:
|
Mar 16 02:50 UTC 2004 |
You don't know??
|
tsty
|
|
response 93 of 95:
|
Mar 16 11:12 UTC 2004 |
re #85 ...... ummmm any comment about the slippery slope ?
#143.67 TS Taylor (tsty) Fri, Mar 12, 2004 (23:17):
welllllllllllllllllllll .... the slippery slope catches up ...
starting with those .yeswrite and .nowrite files AGAINST WHICH i
put up a finger-frothing protest, to no avail.
expecially the vile .yeswrite file philosophy and implementation.
|
twenex
|
|
response 94 of 95:
|
Mar 16 11:22 UTC 2004 |
Yummmm. Yeswrite.
|
jesuit
|
|
response 95 of 95:
|
May 17 02:14 UTC 2006 |
TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE
|