|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 158 responses total. |
brighn
|
|
response 70 of 158:
| 
Feb 19 15:36 UTC 2002 |
Yeah. Like 9-inch dicks.
|
jazz
|
|
response 71 of 158:
|
Feb 19 16:18 UTC 2002 |
One's assume they're *feeling* for those before *looking*.
|
brighn
|
|
response 72 of 158:
|
Feb 19 16:30 UTC 2002 |
Depends. I was thinking of skyclad pagan events (actually, I was thinking of
one woman in particular who hangs out with the skankiest guys in the world
because they're hung like horses).
|
phenix
|
|
response 73 of 158:
|
Feb 19 17:01 UTC 2002 |
bah. then she's stupid and should get out of the gene pool
|
jazz
|
|
response 74 of 158:
|
Feb 19 17:04 UTC 2002 |
Ah, okay.
The overall sketchiness factor of the local pagan communities has
really driven me away from those kinds of events. Especially when I'm
involved with someone in the event.
|
jazz
|
|
response 75 of 158:
|
Feb 19 17:04 UTC 2002 |
Oops, #73 slipped in.
It's no problem. It'll help supply the next generation with stupid,
skanky, well-hung men. Would you deny the next generation its' Ron Jeremy?
|
brighn
|
|
response 76 of 158:
|
Feb 19 17:14 UTC 2002 |
I would.
|
jazz
|
|
response 77 of 158:
|
Feb 19 17:23 UTC 2002 |
Oh, c'mon, there's quite a bit of value in the ol' Hairy Hedgehog.
Humor, for instance. And self-esteem. Where else but in the wonderful world
of porn can the image-obsessed feel good about themselves and rationalise,
"wow if a guy that nasty can be blown by women that beautiful, then there's
hope for me?" Okay, well maybe men really don't need that much more
self-confidence, from what I've seen in bars. But at least he's funny.
|
phenix
|
|
response 78 of 158:
|
Feb 19 17:57 UTC 2002 |
i prefer m ore hugh hefners and less of the hedgehog
|
eeyore
|
|
response 79 of 158:
|
Feb 19 17:58 UTC 2002 |
Don't forget, you are talking about a guy that female porn stars will try
to avoid so much, that they write into their contract that they won't
perform with him.
The othre thing, though, is just look at male porn stars in
general....they're all pretty much nasty. (at least, most of them in the
movies I've seen)
|
jazz
|
|
response 80 of 158:
|
Feb 19 18:08 UTC 2002 |
So are most of the female ones, at least, to me.
Overall, I don't think pornography is an unrealistically high standard
to hold sex to, just ... unrealistic ...
|
brighn
|
|
response 81 of 158:
|
Feb 19 18:37 UTC 2002 |
#77> Maybe it's my Pisces blood, but when I see the Hedgehog getting laid and
I'm not, I don't think, "Wow, there's hope for me," I think, "Boy, I must be
REALLY ugly, because I could never get laid by any of those women."
|
morwen
|
|
response 82 of 158:
|
Feb 19 23:13 UTC 2002 |
resp:70 9-inch dicks aren't very comfortable. Most women are looking
for someone who appreciates them. Problem is all the Good ones always
seem to be taken.
|
phenix
|
|
response 83 of 158:
|
Feb 19 23:27 UTC 2002 |
hah
and all the good women wouldn't know w diamond in the rough if it cut
the sole of thier foot.
or just go for the first guy to pat attention to them.
aka you get the great asshole fest.
and i'ad have to say it depends on the pornography, i've definatly
recently seen some seriously unrealistic expectations but then, i dont
exactly surf vanilla either.
|
eeyore
|
|
response 84 of 158:
|
Feb 20 03:42 UTC 2002 |
Not even true!!!!
I would have to say that none of the guys that I've dated were exactly the
kind to have women draping on them. (Well, one of them was. But I've still
not managed to figure that out since he has all the charm of the Hedgehog)
|
vidar
|
|
response 85 of 158:
|
Feb 20 04:02 UTC 2002 |
Well, I have to admit that as a bi, when I'm showering at the gym I do
look at other guys. Unfortunately, I find that those I'm most
attracted to are the most well hung. Granted I don't think I look long
enough for the other guys to figure out what I'm doing. *sigh*
In any case, I won't expect people to trudge through responses posted
ages before hand to figure out why I do things or find clarifications
on my fetishes.
|
eeyore
|
|
response 86 of 158:
|
Feb 20 05:03 UTC 2002 |
I honestly never really payed much attention to the size of a guy's package
when I see them naked (like movies or whatnot), if for no other reason that
I really don't have any interest in looking.
|
vidar
|
|
response 87 of 158:
|
Feb 20 16:12 UTC 2002 |
I just feel ashamed of falling victim to attraction through sight
alone, especially considering how much I say that appearance doesn't
matter.
|
phenix
|
|
response 88 of 158:
|
Feb 20 16:18 UTC 2002 |
and besides, unless the shower is really "invigorating" you don't know
how big it is deployed
|
jazz
|
|
response 89 of 158:
|
Feb 20 19:10 UTC 2002 |
I think the whole problem with what Greg terms the "great asshole
fest", is that what men look for out of a potential partner is fairly well
known and most men are honest to themselves when asked (though they downplay
parts), whereas what most women look for out of a potential partner isn't,
and isn't very often honestly discussed within earshot of men.
If you read his column, Dan Savage has the right idea in one of his
recent responses (I think it's still up on http://www.onionavclub.com, if
anyone's interested). I've seen a number of men trying to mold themselves
in the shape of what women have told them are the qualities they "wish their
boyfriends had", or qualities that "it'd be great if guys ...", while
ignoring the unspoken qualities that attracted these women to the men they're
with in the first place.
Of course, Dan's got an advice column and says it better than I do.
Now the qualities that many women look for (and women are as diverse
in this as men are) often include a degree of unavailability, the ability to
control one's emotions, and a certain masterfulness or being in control of
their situation. These qualities more often belong to an asshole than they
do to a gentleman. However, women are certainly not alone in selecting for
qualities that may signal trouble down the road, or even revelling in the
fact that they've got a good catch who has just a few issues.
I know I'm going to get an argument on this, but it's a perception
based on a great deal of paying attention to what people *do* rather than
what they *say*.
|
morwen
|
|
response 90 of 158:
|
Feb 20 20:20 UTC 2002 |
Well, I knew what I was looking for. I wanted someone who made me
laugh. Someone I felt was my friend first. I wanted someone I could
talk with. Some of you met Jon and I when we visited a couple of
years ago. Pardon me, Jon, but he's not in the greatest physical
shape and he is *not what you would call "well hung", but, to me, he
is a wonderful man. Now I'm not saying that, if Jon had been a
wonderful physical specimen, I wouldn't have been thrilled to death,
but physical looks is only part of the package. I wanted someone I
could *live* with first. I guess the difference is I was looking for
something with more long-term perks.
|
phenix
|
|
response 91 of 158:
|
Feb 20 20:28 UTC 2002 |
seee, if women would just, y'know own up to some things we could avoid
the freind syndrome
btw, if you know what that is, i feel sorry for you
|
brighn
|
|
response 92 of 158:
|
Feb 20 20:35 UTC 2002 |
I assume it's related to what someone (who was polyamorous) said to me:
"Brighn, I just want to have one male friend I haven't slept with."
Take out my testicles and staple them to the wall, I don't want them anymore.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 93 of 158:
|
Feb 20 21:14 UTC 2002 |
Sounds like rather the opposite, actually: hearing "you're such a good
friend... you're like a brother to me... " when you're looking for "so, good
lookin', what're you up to tonight?"
|
phenix
|
|
response 94 of 158:
|
Feb 20 21:47 UTC 2002 |
dan's got it in one.
"you're such a good freind" <cringe> i swear, if i hear that one more time
in releatoin to "why can't i find a decent man who listens to me and would
be a good freind" i'm going to just start shooting people
|