You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-7   7-26         
 
Author Message
20 new of 26 responses total.
willcome
response 7 of 26: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 04:21 UTC 2004

Probably about your penis.
naftee
response 8 of 26: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 06:13 UTC 2004

re 6
"24/48 hours"?!?! What the fuck are you talking about?
willcome
response 9 of 26: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 16:55 UTC 2004

(he's talking about his penis.)
gull
response 10 of 26: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 17:19 UTC 2004

Re resp:6: I don't think it's fair to Jan *or* Valerie to suggest that
Jan try to explain Valerie's motivations.  Just because they have a
relationship doesn't mean they share a single brain.
richard
response 11 of 26: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 19:37 UTC 2004

Sure its fair to ASK them, one of them, to explain Gull.  It wouldn't be fair
to in any way try to coerce or force them to, but any of us have the right
to ask questions.  There is such a thing as being TOO sensitive Gull, and when
you do that, try to be overly "fair" to one side, you end up being unfair to
the other side.  There is absolutely and unequivocally nothin wrong, or
unfair, about ASKING Jan or Valerie if they would mind explaining what
happened and why.  Its just a question after all.
gull
response 12 of 26: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 22:08 UTC 2004

I don't appreciate it when other people try to explain my motives for
me, generally speaking.  Maybe Valerie feels differently, but I always
kind of hesitate to say things like, "they're your
[friend|girlfriend|relative], *you* explain what they were thinking."
jp2
response 13 of 26: Mark Unseen   Jan 19 18:34 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

tod
response 14 of 26: Mark Unseen   Jan 19 21:21 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

naftee
response 15 of 26: Mark Unseen   Jan 20 01:49 UTC 2004

haha
willcome
response 16 of 26: Mark Unseen   Jan 20 02:00 UTC 2004

Re. 12:  Why do you hate community so much?
janc
response 17 of 26: Mark Unseen   Jan 24 21:30 UTC 2004

Nobody is owed an explanation.  

Valerie has left the building.  She is no longer a member of this community.
She does not have to tell anyone why.

However, if a person were to read what has been said here, and think about it
for a while, then they could probably come up with a pretty good approximation.
Nothing is secret.  Nothing has not been said.  If you can set aside the
sexism and the general jangling noise between your ears, it'll all be plain
enough.
naftee
response 18 of 26: Mark Unseen   Jan 24 22:21 UTC 2004

There's been tonnes of jangling and most of the GreX public still has no idea
that the web page of GreX lies.
kip
response 19 of 26: Mark Unseen   Jan 24 22:33 UTC 2004

Oh, pretty please, tell us what parts of 'the web page of Grex' lie and why
you think it lies.
naftee
response 20 of 26: Mark Unseen   Jan 25 00:40 UTC 2004

Oh, just the little bit about censorship and the blue ribbon.  It's minor,
really.
jaklumen
response 21 of 26: Mark Unseen   Jan 25 10:16 UTC 2004

<begins singing Phil Collin's "That's All">
gull
response 22 of 26: Mark Unseen   Jan 25 22:16 UTC 2004

naftee is probably one of those people who accuses the local newspaper
of censoring him every time they fail to print his letter to the editor.
naftee
response 23 of 26: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 01:00 UTC 2004

Hah.  Actually, it's mostly indirect involvement with censorship that I've
had.
mfp
response 24 of 26: Mark Unseen   Sep 22 02:53 UTC 2004

Holy Christ, willcome.  You'd better go to a writing clinic before handing
in any university papers.  I mean, fuck, you can see where you go wrong when
you reread your writing, but you have no fucking idea how to fix it.
naftee
response 25 of 26: Mark Unseen   Sep 24 06:15 UTC 2004

Just enlist jp2 as your professor.
jesuit
response 26 of 26: Mark Unseen   May 17 02:14 UTC 2006

TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE
 0-7   7-26         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss