You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   44-68   69-93   94-118   119-143   144-168   169-193   194-218 
 219-243   244-268   269-293   294-318   319-327      
 
Author Message
25 new of 327 responses total.
jmsaul
response 69 of 327: Mark Unseen   Jan 1 07:56 UTC 2003

Re #66:  Lighter side?  Abagnale's home life is depressing as hell.
anderyn
response 70 of 327: Mark Unseen   Jan 1 18:22 UTC 2003

I don't have to agree with an artist to like or dislike her work. But I can
make a choice about someone I do know I agree/disagree with based upon that,
if I want to. I know that there's a writer who's just made a big stir upon
the internet who has just lost my possible buying of her book (reviews made
it sound intriguing, but too expensive for an impulse buy, but I was going
to buy it in paperback, but she decided to make a big stink about a review
and go after the reviewer and say that "readers cant' review books" in
essence) because of her stance. 
snowth
response 71 of 327: Mark Unseen   Jan 1 18:58 UTC 2003

Also went and saw Adaptation this week, after much "are we going? Are we going
_now_? Can we please leave already!" 

I swear it breaks every law of good writing, and even breaks most of the for
good film writing. The first half is more or less PAINFUL to watch, the second
half is just rediculous. The movie is absolutely _facinating_, but... 

When I get old and become a writing professor so that stupid undergrads can
attempt to take my job away from me, I'm going to recommend this movie. "Here
is everything you shouldn't do with a script, and I don't want to see it
unless you can do it better than he did". 

It's not a good movie, but it's definately Interesting.
tpryan
response 72 of 327: Mark Unseen   Jan 1 21:53 UTC 2003

re 6 How do you demoralize an Orc?  It would seem that moralizing
them would not make them want to fight, which seems to be their
first nature.
remmers
response 73 of 327: Mark Unseen   Jan 1 23:28 UTC 2003

Saw "Catch Me If You Can" today.  Most enjoyable Spielberg I've seen
in some time.  Continuously entertaining, with lots of deft, clever
touches, and a nice 60s period feel (even the titles).

Re #71:  By the time you're an old writing professor, "Adaptation"
will be an enshrined classic.  And anyway, you'll have tenure, so
your students can't take your job away from you.  Worst that can
happen is that they'll become your colleagues and you won't be
able to order them around anymore.  (This has happened to me...)
rcurl
response 74 of 327: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 00:51 UTC 2003

Went to see Lord of the Rings: Two Towers. It is a combination of Star
Trek and a Mel Gibson thriller: the aliens are still all humanoid. The
best moment for me was when the Orcs were seiging the keep and the Elves
were ready with bows drawn, and the chief Elf yelled "FIRE": I chuckled
for the test of the film. There will probably be a Sequal and a Prequal. 

md
response 75 of 327: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 01:27 UTC 2003

I bet you're right!
furs
response 76 of 327: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 02:14 UTC 2003

I went to see "Two Weeks Notice" with my mother in law.  I probably 
would have not gone to see it, but she wanted to and the guys wouldn't 
go so being the trooper I am, I went.  It was predictable, but fairly 
entertaining.
jep
response 77 of 327: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 02:50 UTC 2003

re #67: I don't look up the backgrounds of artists, actors, writers, 
etc. as a rule.  It happens that Polanski's crimes were widely 
reported, and so I remember them, and so I have a tendency to be turned 
off from interest in his work.

I generally don't know who directed the films I watch.  I don't know 
who directed the Lord of the Rings films, the Harry Potter films, or 
most any movies I've seen.  I got a copy of "Fiddler on the Roof", my 
favorite musical, but don't know who made it.  I don't know who made 
the Godfather movies, the Blues Brothers movie, or any of my favorite 
Disney movies.  I don't know what a director does, or a producer.  I'm 
not interested in the process of making movies, I just watch some 
movies and like some of what I watch.

Roman Polanski movies tend to be advertised as being made by Polanski, 
so it's easy to avoid them.  If I found out he made the Star Trek 
movies that I liked, or "Ice Age" (which my son just watched tonight 
and which I liked), I guess I'd have an interesting decision.  I 
probably wouldn't get rid of anything I already have, but I wouldn't be 
inclined to buy or rent more of those movies.

This makes me equivalent to Stalin?  Wow.  I'd say if you believe that, 
you have a tendency to hyperbolize.
senna
response 78 of 327: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 03:34 UTC 2003

While both Star Trek and LOTR have produced explanations of why their enemy
(and, in Star Trek, friendly) beings so closely resemble the race of the main
protagonists, it's worth noting that LOTR"s reason is built into the backstory
and exists without a special effects budget to keep in mind.  Star Trek came
up with its explanation late in TNG and used it as the focal point for one
episode, basically a late-arriving excuse for years of cash-strapped special
effects departments.
remmers
response 79 of 327: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 10:51 UTC 2003

Re #77:  Hm.  It takes many hands to make a movie, but the director
is in most instances the primary "author", so I tend to pay attention
to who the directors are.  For me, not knowing who directed the
Godfather films would be akin to not knowing who wrote "A Tale of
Two Cities" or "The Stand".  If I learn that a particular movie was
directed by David Lynch, John Dahl, Spike Jonze, Roman Polanski, or
Martin Scorsese (just to name a few examples), then I'll probably
go to see it.  This is not to say that every movie made by those
directors is automatically good, but I've learned that the director's
name is a better indicator of whether I'll like a film or not than,
say, what the critics think of it.

For a discussion of "film director as author", and why the role of
film director is different from that of a stage director, see
http://www.moderntimes.com/palace/director.htm .
russ
response 80 of 327: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 11:13 UTC 2003

Re #72:  To demoralize orcs, you give them dirty magazines.  This is
best done with a catapult specialized for lobbing pornography into
the enemy camp, known as the "arbalust".
mynxcat
response 81 of 327: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 15:15 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

mxyzptlk
response 82 of 327: Mark Unseen   Jan 3 13:03 UTC 2003

Re: #78:  The Trek explanation actually goes back to the original
series, which talks about "The Preservers" seeding the galaxy.  They
also had "Hodgkin's Law of Parallel Planet Development". 
krj
response 83 of 327: Mark Unseen   Jan 5 04:52 UTC 2003

"Die Another Day:"  No doubt my initial reaction is a little over 
enthusiastic...

The first hour is the best hour of James Bond film ever, with 
development and plotting that we've never seen in the series 
before.  After that it gets a bit silly, especially when the 
invisible car comes in, but overall I think it's the 
best Bond film in 30 years.
jmsaul
response 84 of 327: Mark Unseen   Jan 5 06:58 UTC 2003

It motivated me and Lisa to rent some of the earlier Bond flicks (on DVD,
they're especially cool because they have documentaries and commentary). 
Violations of physical laws are part of the genre, so the invisible car isn't
really out of line.
void
response 85 of 327: Mark Unseen   Jan 5 10:23 UTC 2003

   What's the pseudonym used by directors who either don't want to
admit they made a film or want their name removed from the credits?
remmers
response 86 of 327: Mark Unseen   Jan 5 11:16 UTC 2003

Alan Smithee
mary
response 87 of 327: Mark Unseen   Jan 5 13:54 UTC 2003

Over the holiday break I was able to get caught up
on recent releases.

Adaptations: Another brilliant example of blending
fact and fiction so well it's hard to tell the
boundaries.  But maybe that's the point.

LOTRTT:  Mostly for those who like cars blowing up
but on a grand scale with lots of chainmail.

Catch Me If You Can:  A fairly subtle touch for
a Spielberg film.  And the best part is it's all
true.

About Schmidt:  I liked it but suspect it will not
do well at the box office.  Not once word gets 
out it's a fairy slow character piece that gets
its humor from being searingly honest about dull
lives.
jmsaul
response 88 of 327: Mark Unseen   Jan 5 15:15 UTC 2003

(Actually, Catch Me If You Can is based on a true story, but it takes a number
of liberties with the truth.  http://www.abagnale.com/facomments.html .)
mary
response 89 of 327: Mark Unseen   Jan 5 16:59 UTC 2003

I suspect one "addition" is the scene where Abagnale looks 
though the window at the family life he never had.  That's sappy
enought to be pure Spielberg.
mary
response 90 of 327: Mark Unseen   Jan 5 17:00 UTC 2003

s/through/though and enough/enought

I really should proofread.
slynne
response 91 of 327: Mark Unseen   Jan 5 18:55 UTC 2003

I havent seen the movie but I just finished reading the book. My copy 
has a nice interview with him about the movie. He does say that he 
would have rather his parents didnt divorce but he doesnt put a lot of 
emphasis on that. 

Anyhow, it is a really good read.
remmers
response 92 of 327: Mark Unseen   Jan 5 19:02 UTC 2003

Re #89:  Indeed.  If I hadn't known it was a Spielberg movie, I
probably would have guessed it at that point.
other
response 93 of 327: Mark Unseen   Jan 5 20:12 UTC 2003

re #85-86: I believe it is Allan Smithee  (two 'l's)
 0-24   25-49   44-68   69-93   94-118   119-143   144-168   169-193   194-218 
 219-243   244-268   269-293   294-318   319-327      
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss