|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 278 responses total. |
davel
|
|
response 67 of 278:
| 
Apr 13 01:35 UTC 1999 |
Brother Lawrence?
|
davel
|
|
response 68 of 278:
|
Apr 13 01:39 UTC 1999 |
Grace (looking over my shoulder) says "maybe Thomas a' Kempis?". (This should
count as a guess on her part, not a second guess on mine; I'm only playing
secretary here. If it's right, she'll have to come up with quotes & type them
in herself.)
|
danr
|
|
response 69 of 278:
|
Apr 13 01:44 UTC 1999 |
I'm not familiar with either Brother Lawrence or Thomas a' Kempis. The author
does, however, have both a given name and a name which he took upon entering
the monastery.
|
bookworm
|
|
response 70 of 278:
|
Apr 13 03:53 UTC 1999 |
This sounds familiar to me as well.
Is it Thomas Equinas?
|
aruba
|
|
response 71 of 278:
|
Apr 13 04:34 UTC 1999 |
St. Augustine?
|
mcnally
|
|
response 72 of 278:
|
Apr 13 06:13 UTC 1999 |
Seems too touchy-feely to be Aquinas and too full of love to be Augustine.
Is this text translated from another language?
|
danr
|
|
response 73 of 278:
|
Apr 13 12:26 UTC 1999 |
Not Aquinas, not Augustine. In fact, the two passages were written in the 20th
century--in English.
|
anderyn
|
|
response 74 of 278:
|
Apr 13 16:00 UTC 1999 |
Thomas Merton?
|
jep
|
|
response 75 of 278:
|
Apr 13 16:02 UTC 1999 |
C. S. Lewis?
|
omni
|
|
response 76 of 278:
|
Apr 13 18:15 UTC 1999 |
Reynolds Price?
|
happyboy
|
|
response 77 of 278:
|
Apr 13 19:18 UTC 1999 |
Pee Wee Herman?
|
danr
|
|
response 78 of 278:
|
Apr 13 23:24 UTC 1999 |
Thomas Merton is right!
it's top's turn.
|
anderyn
|
|
response 79 of 278:
|
Apr 14 00:45 UTC 1999 |
Oh my.
I'll enter something soon.
|
davel
|
|
response 80 of 278:
|
Apr 14 11:32 UTC 1999 |
Aha. FWIW, A' Kempis wrote _The_Imitation_of_Christ_, and Brother Lawrence
wrote _The_Practice_of_the_Presence_of_God_. Both have been around a lot
longer than Merton.
|
davel
|
|
response 81 of 278:
|
Apr 24 11:23 UTC 1999 |
> #79 Twila Oxley Price (anderyn) (Tue, Apr 13, 1999 (20:45)):
> Oh my.
> I'll enter something soon.
Ahem. This does *not* qualify as "soon".
|
bookworm
|
|
response 82 of 278:
|
Apr 27 21:53 UTC 1999 |
definitely not.
Twila, can I go next if you are having problems coming up with
something?
|
anderyn
|
|
response 83 of 278:
|
Apr 28 01:45 UTC 1999 |
Dang. Sorry. Will enter something tomorrow. Have it in mind.
|
anderyn
|
|
response 84 of 278:
|
Apr 29 00:14 UTC 1999 |
Okay. Got a quote for you all.
I met him first in a hurricane; and though we had gone through the hurricane
on the same schooner, it was not until the schooner had gone to pieces under
us that I first laid eyes on him. Without doubt I had seen him with the rest
of the kanaka crew on board, but I had not consciously been aware of his
existence, for the _Petite Jeanne_ was rather crowded.
More later.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 85 of 278:
|
Apr 29 00:25 UTC 1999 |
Could it be Robert Louis Stevenson?
|
anderyn
|
|
response 86 of 278:
|
Apr 29 00:55 UTC 1999 |
No, it's not. But you're in the right time period, mostly.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 87 of 278:
|
Apr 29 04:57 UTC 1999 |
Stevenson seemed like a good guess because of the Hawaiian connection..
|
omni
|
|
response 88 of 278:
|
Apr 29 07:20 UTC 1999 |
Swift?
|
remmers
|
|
response 89 of 278:
|
Apr 29 12:49 UTC 1999 |
Swift was more than a bit earlier than Stevenson.
Hm, no clue at this point. I could try guessing a few authors who wrote
about the sea but will wait until I have more to go on.
|
anderyn
|
|
response 90 of 278:
|
Apr 29 13:31 UTC 1999 |
Not Swift, no.
|
md
|
|
response 91 of 278:
|
Apr 29 14:20 UTC 1999 |
Jack London?
|